From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach)
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:04:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100804090455.GE12134@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimTwxV7=xOF+t6fB5iC-2p4ODH89z40HwR3kiDp@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:20:42AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 03-08-10 15:35, Martin Jansa wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:13:58PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@ti.com>
> >>>
> >>> If noone objects, can we get this in ASAP?
> >>
> >> Building from scratch armv4t then armv6 was ok, building few more
> >> packages for armv4t again still worked, but now I've upgraded gcc/eglibc
> >> and building eglibc-initial for armv4t first fails:
> >>
> >> http://tinderbox.openembedded.org/packages/665289/
> >> http://build.shr-project.org/tests/jama/config.log
> >>
> >> see
> >> configure: error: compiler support for __thread is require
> >> and
> >> Fatal error: Invalid -march= option: `armv4t'
> >
> > I had that with a previous incarnation of that patchset, but it seems to
> > have gone away.
> > Do we want to solve this problem first or apply the patches and solve it
> > later?
> I would suggest that I push these changes and meanwhile
> I will try to reproduce Martin's problem it will take few hours on my
> box. It seems that the binutils got wiped out
> when Martin cleaned stuff and then building eglibc resorted to
> assembler on build machine
> and that bombs later.
I think I had last incarnation (at last latest on patchwork - pw-am.sh
2521 2524 2525 2523 2522).
Khem was right about binutils issue.
I did something like this:
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image
MACHINE=htcdream bitbake shr-image
git pull (for newer gcc+eglibc)
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - and now it failed to build eglibc-initial
MACHINE=htcdream bitbake shr-image - this upgraded gcc/eglibc fine
export MACHINE=om-gta02
for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb \
openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb; do
bitbake -c clean -b $i;
done
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - still failing in eglibc-initial
export MACHINE=htcdream
for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb \
openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb; do
bitbake -c clean -b $i;
done
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - still failing in eglibc-initial
export MACHINE=om-gta02
for i in openembedded/recipes/gcc/gcc*4.5*bb
openembedded/recipes/eglibc/eglibc*2.12*.bb
openembedded/recipes/binutils/binutils*2.20.1*.bb ; do
bitbake -c clean -b $i;
done
MACHINE=om-gta02 bitbake shr-image - seems to pass now
Regards,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-04 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-31 5:34 [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach) Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] bitbake.conf, cmake.bbclass, cross.bbclass, icecc.bbclass: Point the toolchain paths to new multi-machine friendly toolchain install location Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] binutils-cross.inc: Dont install duplicate copies of tools create relative symlinks instead Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] gcc, eglibc: Use the paths for mutli-machine safe toolchain install Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] recipes: Fix the PATHs for toolchains Khem Raj
2010-07-31 5:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] mpfr_3.0.0.bb: Override needs to be thumb instead of armv4t Khem Raj
2010-07-31 9:48 ` [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach) Koen Kooi
2010-07-31 13:34 ` Koen Kooi
2010-07-31 18:54 ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-02 9:33 ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-02 16:27 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-03 10:13 ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-03 10:21 ` Martin Jansa
2010-08-03 10:29 ` Andrea Adami
2010-08-03 10:31 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-08-03 13:35 ` Martin Jansa
2010-08-03 15:36 ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-03 17:20 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-04 9:04 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2010-08-03 19:58 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-03 19:56 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-01 15:48 ` Eric Bénard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100804090455.GE12134@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox