Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach)
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 12:13:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <i38q56$4hq$1@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinE0=x74yBxHsGCpRLFoQfDF+gHeuHFMG=D+rY_@mail.gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Acked-by: Koen Kooi <k-kooi@ti.com>

If noone objects, can we get this in ASAP?



On 02-08-10 18:27, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl> wrote:
> On 31-07-10 20:54, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>> On 31-07-10 15:34, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>> On 31-07-10 11:48, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>>> On 31-07-10 07:34, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>>>>> Following series of patches are for making multi-machine toolchains co-exist with
>>>>>>> new cross staging for toolchain.
>>>>
>>>>>>> It installs the toolchain in <native sysroot>/usr/${BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH}
>>>>>>> this way we can have multiple toolchains co-existing for different sub-arches and major arches too.
>>>>
>>>>>>> I have booted a native-sdk-image on qemuarm successfully. The build for
>>>>>>> beagleboard minimal image using different versions of toolchain went all fine too.
>>>>
>>>>>>> Please test these patches and if seem ok provide some ACKS/NACKS
>>>>
>>>>>> Khem, thanks for working on this!
>>>>
>>>>>> Firing of a build now :)
>>>>
>>>>> 'MACHINE=beagleboard bitbake ffmpeg samba mysql5 gstreamer-ti' completed
>>>>> succesfully, doing a 'MACHINE=hawkboard bitbake gtk+' now.
>>>>
>>>> And that seems to have worked as well. I have kicked of a huge
>>>> multimachine build on the 16core buildserver at work and will inspect
>>>> the results on monday. But so far it's looking really good.
> 
> The multimachine build finished as well. Before I ack this patch, are we
> going to match the OE layout to the one used in poky?
> 
>> I think the layout we have is nice because it still keeps the cross
>> bits somewhat
>> and lets relocatable class to fudge the rpath and we are in native sysroot.
>> and <sysroot>/usr/armv5te/bin looks a bit better than
>> <sysroot>/usr/bin/armv5te/bin
> 
> 
> regards,
> 
> Koen
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMV+vmMkyGM64RGpERAr53AJ9tDqQpQsYNI8ghsSZ/Jq6od6IilwCeJ9Cf
GEp6+dnTlLtFyDcANsrx6lo=
=dAXV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-03 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-31  5:34 [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach) Khem Raj
2010-07-31  5:34 ` [PATCH 1/5] bitbake.conf, cmake.bbclass, cross.bbclass, icecc.bbclass: Point the toolchain paths to new multi-machine friendly toolchain install location Khem Raj
2010-07-31  5:34 ` [PATCH 2/5] binutils-cross.inc: Dont install duplicate copies of tools create relative symlinks instead Khem Raj
2010-07-31  5:34 ` [PATCH 3/5] gcc, eglibc: Use the paths for mutli-machine safe toolchain install Khem Raj
2010-07-31  5:34 ` [PATCH 4/5] recipes: Fix the PATHs for toolchains Khem Raj
2010-07-31  5:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] mpfr_3.0.0.bb: Override needs to be thumb instead of armv4t Khem Raj
2010-07-31  9:48 ` [PATCH 0/5][v4] Make multi-machine toolchains to co-exist (Alternate approach) Koen Kooi
2010-07-31 13:34   ` Koen Kooi
2010-07-31 18:54     ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-02  9:33       ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-02 16:27         ` Khem Raj
2010-08-03 10:13           ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2010-08-03 10:21             ` Martin Jansa
2010-08-03 10:29               ` Andrea Adami
2010-08-03 10:31             ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-08-03 13:35             ` Martin Jansa
2010-08-03 15:36               ` Koen Kooi
2010-08-03 17:20                 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-04  9:04                   ` Martin Jansa
2010-08-03 19:58                 ` Khem Raj
2010-08-03 19:56               ` Khem Raj
2010-08-01 15:48 ` Eric Bénard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='i38q56$4hq$1@dough.gmane.org' \
    --to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox