From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Archived patchwork entries Was: OE-Classic patches in patchwork
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:49:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130115234902.GC3002@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121214110507.GB8699@jama.jama.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4506 bytes --]
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:05:07PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:20:58AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:11:22PM +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > There is a significant volume of patches in the OE patchwork [1] that are
> > > intended to apply to OE-Classic. Apart from the 2011.3-maintenance branch, OE-
> > > Classic is no longer maintained in favour of OE-Core + layers, so the question
> > > is what should we do with these patches? At the moment I'm thinking we should
> > > just mark them as "archived" so that they disappear from the queue; people can
> > > still get access to them if needed.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > There is also 70 patches from chase maupin just updating LICENSE to
> > contain also version.
> >
> > I'm not using oe-classic anymore, but I believe he prepared them
> > carefully and it's worth merging.
> >
> > I'll create bundle from it and apply it tomorrow if nobody objects.
>
> Can we fix patchwork to show bundles marked as public to public users?
>
> I've few bundles
> Name Project Public Link Patches Download Delete
> in-test oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/in-test/ 21
> oe-classic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic/ 61
> oe-classic-lic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic-lic/ 70
> 2011.03-maintenance oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/2011.03-maintenance/ 1
> denzil oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/denzil/ 6
> danny oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/danny/ 5
> meta-handheld oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-handheld/ 1
> meta-java oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-java/ 15
> meta-opie oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-opie/ 1
>
> But without sharing link to bundle, nobody will find it (AFAIK) maybe
> there is newer version of Patchwork which shows public bundles
> somewhere?
>
> oe-classic bundle is now marked as archived - so not listed by default.
> oe-classic-lic also marked as archived and I'll apply it later today.
>
> It would be great if we agree to mark patches as archived when they get assigned
> to some bundle to keep main patchwork list relatively clean and layer/release
> maintainers can still see all patches with "New" state in corresponding bundle.
>
> I've also marked some patches with review comments without reply as
> "Changes requested" + archived. Pity that some patches had rather
> trivial issues, but submitter never responded with v2..
>
> And there were some patches for oe-core already applied in oe-core.. so
> marked as "Not applicable" + archived.
Andrea just asked about this, so if someone missed this information:
There are some bundles:
2011.03-maintenance oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/2011.03-maintenance/ 1
danny oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/danny/ 9
denzil oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/denzil/ 10
in-test oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/in-test/ 161
meta-browser oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-browser/ 7
meta-handheld oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-handheld/ 2
meta-initramfs oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-initramfs/ 1
meta-java oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-java/ 15
meta-kde oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-kde/ 1
meta-networking oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/ 12
meta-opie oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-opie/ 2
meta-systemd oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-systemd/ 25
meta-webserver oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-webserver/ 2
oe-classic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic/ 62
oe-classic-lic oe http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/oe-classic-lic/ 70
I'm adding patches to right bundle when I'm sorting patches to
test them on jenkins (in-test bundle, contrib/jansa/in-test branch).
In the process I'm marking them as "Archived" (to see what's not sorted in main page),
but because their state stays "New" you can still find them in bundles, e.g.
http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-webserver/?archive=both
Cheers,
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-04 18:11 OE-Classic patches in patchwork Paul Eggleton
2012-12-04 19:39 ` Otavio Salvador
2012-12-13 23:20 ` Martin Jansa
2012-12-14 11:05 ` Martin Jansa
2013-01-15 23:49 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130115234902.GC3002@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox