Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denis@denix.org>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-oe][PATCH 1/7] linuxptp: Create 1.4 version
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 14:00:00 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140328180000.GM3370@denix.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1394227575-27897-1-git-send-email-lauren.post@freescale.com>

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 03:26:09PM -0600, Lauren Post wrote:
> Precision Time Protocol (PTP) according to IEEE standard 1588

Heh, another instance of "duplication" - I also have a similar recipe in my 
layer... Well, I do understand that "the early bird gets the worm" or the 
first submitter gets his change merged, but let me point out few issues:


> Signed-off-by: Lauren Post <lauren.post@freescale.com>
> ---
>  .../recipes-connectivity/linuxptp/linuxptp_1.4.bb  |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/linuxptp/linuxptp_1.4.bb
> 
> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/linuxptp/linuxptp_1.4.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/linuxptp/linuxptp_1.4.bb
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c708b13
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-connectivity/linuxptp/linuxptp_1.4.bb
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +DESCRIPTION = "Precision Time Protocol (PTP) according to IEEE standard 1588 for Linux"
> +LICENSE = "GPLv2"
> +LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263"
> +
> +DEPENDS = "virtual/kernel"
> +
> +SRC_URI = "http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxptp/files/v${PV}/linuxptp-${PV}.tgz"
> +
> +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "a37ad2b2ef7d1ebc4d64a66d3fe55cdf"
> +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = "6cfd5291fb7394cc9f25458927874a203971b66b76d1c9d6568e007d0cbd81f2"
> +
> +inherit autotools pkgconfig

It's easy to see that linuxptp build doesn't really use autotools or pkgconfig


> +EXTRA_OEMAKE = 'KBUILD_OUTPUT="${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}" CROSS_COMPILE="${TARGET_PREFIX}"'
> +
> +do_configure_append () {
> +    find ${S} -name makefile | xargs sed -i 's,^\(CC\|CFLAGS\|prefix\|AR\)=,\1 ?=,g'

Why do you need to mangle the makefile? Passing CROSS_COMPILE and maybe ARCH 
should be enough, isn't it?


> +}
> +
> +do_install () {
> +    install -d ${D}/${bindir}
> +    install -p ${S}/ptp4l  ${D}/${bindir}
> +    install -p ${S}/pmc  ${D}/${bindir}
> +    install -p ${S}/phc2sys  ${D}/${bindir}
> +    install -p ${S}/hwstamp_ctl  ${D}/${bindir}
> +}

And the last bit about dependency on virtual/kernel above and passing 
KBUILD_OUTPUT=STAGING_KERNEL_DIR to the build - I have looked into what that 
does and it tries to locate the correct /usr/include/linux/net_tstamp.h just 
to see if it contains definition for HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC. But that header 
file hasn't changed in at least 5 years. Anyway, the result of the check is to 
pass some defines to their build. I ended up just short-cutting the check and 
avoid unnecessary dependency on virtual/kernel:

EXTRA_OEMAKE = "CROSS_COMPILE=${TARGET_PREFIX} ARCH=${TARGET_ARCH} \
                EXTRA_CFLAGS='-D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_CLOCK_ADJTIME \
                -DHAVE_ONESTEP_SYNC'"

Should I submit a patch to fix the above issues?

-- 
Denys


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-03-28 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <lauren.post@freescale.com>
2014-03-07 21:26 ` [meta-oe][PATCH 1/7] linuxptp: Create 1.4 version Lauren Post
2014-03-07 21:26   ` [meta-oe][PATCH 2/7] obexftp: Create 0.23 version Lauren Post
2014-03-07 21:26   ` [meta-oe][PATCH 3/7] can-utils: Create git version Lauren Post
2014-03-11 14:08     ` Martin Jansa
2014-03-11 14:26       ` Otavio Salvador
2014-03-07 21:26   ` [meta-oe][PATCH 4/7] glcompbench: Create 2012.08 version Lauren Post
2014-03-11 15:51     ` Martin Jansa
2014-03-07 21:26   ` [meta-oe][PATCH 5/7] gtkperf: Create 0.40 version Lauren Post
2014-03-11 14:14     ` Martin Jansa
2014-03-07 21:26   ` [meta-oe][PATCH 6/7] vlan: Create 1.9 version Lauren Post
2014-03-11 14:17     ` Martin Jansa
2014-03-17 16:26       ` Otavio Salvador
2014-03-17 17:24         ` Martin Jansa
2014-03-07 21:26   ` [meta-oe][PATCH 7/7] openobex: Remove --enable-dump to disable dumping Lauren Post
2014-03-28 18:00   ` Denys Dmytriyenko [this message]
2014-03-29 18:40     ` [meta-oe][PATCH 1/7] linuxptp: Create 1.4 version Otavio Salvador
2014-03-29 21:08       ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2014-06-27 17:13 ` [meta-oe][PATCH v3] cpuburn-neon: Upgrade to version 20140626 Lauren Post
2014-07-15 18:27   ` Otavio Salvador
2014-07-15 19:06     ` Martin Jansa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140328180000.GM3370@denix.org \
    --to=denis@denix.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox