* [sumo] [meta-networking] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: CVE-2017-15107
@ 2018-09-24 19:21 Sinan Kaya
2018-09-24 22:14 ` akuster808
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Kaya @ 2018-09-24 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
* CVE-2017-15107
A vulnerability was found in Dnsmasq's implementation of DNSSEC.
Wildcard synthesized NSEC records could be improperly interpreted
to prove the non-existence of hostnames that actually exist.
Affects dnsmasq <= 2.78
CVE: CVE-2017-15107
Ref: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2017-15107
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
---
.../recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb | 1 +
.../dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch | 262 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 263 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch
diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb
index 4d1dc6e69..d2465f82d 100644
--- a/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require dnsmasq.inc
SRC_URI += "\
file://lua.patch \
+ file://CVE-2017-15107.patch \
"
SRC_URI[dnsmasq-2.78.md5sum] = "3bb97f264c73853f802bf70610150788"
diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch b/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..da2af56cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
+From 5a56e1b78a753d3295564daddc9ce389cc69fd68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>
+Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:26:08 +0000
+Subject: [PATCH] DNSSEC fix for wildcard NSEC records. CVE-2017-15107 applies.
+
+It's OK for NSEC records to be expanded from wildcards,
+but in that case, the proof of non-existence is only valid
+starting at the wildcard name, *.<domain> NOT the name expanded
+from the wildcard. Without this check it's possible for an
+attacker to craft an NSEC which wrongly proves non-existence
+in a domain which includes a wildcard for NSEC.
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport [http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=4fe6744a220eddd3f1749b40cac3dfc510787de6]
+Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
+---
+ CHANGELOG | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
+ src/dnssec.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
+ 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/CHANGELOG b/CHANGELOG
+index 075fe1a6..5226dce8 100644
+--- a/CHANGELOG
++++ b/CHANGELOG
+@@ -1,3 +1,47 @@
++version 2.79
++ Fix parsing of CNAME arguments, which are confused by extra spaces.
++ Thanks to Diego Aguirre for spotting the bug.
++
++ Where available, use IP_UNICAST_IF or IPV6_UNICAST_IF to bind
++ upstream servers to an interface, rather than SO_BINDTODEVICE.
++ Thanks to Beniamino Galvani for the patch.
++
++ Always return a SERVFAIL answer to DNS queries without the
++ recursion desired bit set, UNLESS acting as an authoritative
++ DNS server. This avoids a potential route to cache snooping.
++
++ Add support for Ed25519 signatures in DNSSEC validation.
++
++ No longer support RSA/MD5 signatures in DNSSEC validation,
++ since these are not secure. This behaviour is mandated in
++ RFC-6944.
++
++ Fix incorrect error exit code from dhcp_release6 utility.
++ Thanks Gaudenz Steinlin for the bug report.
++
++ Use SIGINT (instead of overloading SIGHUP) to turn on DNSSEC
++ time validation when --dnssec-no-timecheck is in use.
++ Note that this is an incompatible change from earlier releases.
++
++ Allow more than one --bridge-interface option to refer to an
++ interface, so that we can use
++ --bridge-interface=int1,alias1
++ --bridge-interface=int1,alias2
++ as an alternative to
++ --bridge-interface=int1,alias1,alias2
++ Thanks to Neil Jerram for work on this.
++
++ Fix for DNSSEC with wildcard-derived NSEC records.
++ It's OK for NSEC records to be expanded from wildcards,
++ but in that case, the proof of non-existence is only valid
++ starting at the wildcard name, *.<domain> NOT the name expanded
++ from the wildcard. Without this check it's possible for an
++ attacker to craft an NSEC which wrongly proves non-existence.
++ Thanks to Ralph Dolmans for finding this, and co-ordinating
++ the vulnerability tracking and fix release.
++ CVE-2017-15107 applies.
++
++
+ version 2.78
+ Fix logic of appending ".<layer>" to PXE basename. Thanks to Chris
+ Novakovic for the patch.
+diff --git a/src/dnssec.c b/src/dnssec.c
+index a74d01ab..1417be56 100644
+--- a/src/dnssec.c
++++ b/src/dnssec.c
+@@ -424,15 +424,17 @@ static void from_wire(char *name)
+ static int count_labels(char *name)
+ {
+ int i;
+-
++ char *p;
++
+ if (*name == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+- for (i = 0; *name; name++)
+- if (*name == '.')
++ for (p = name, i = 0; *p; p++)
++ if (*p == '.')
+ i++;
+
+- return i+1;
++ /* Don't count empty first label. */
++ return *name == '.' ? i : i+1;
+ }
+
+ /* Implement RFC1982 wrapped compare for 32-bit numbers */
+@@ -1405,8 +1407,8 @@ static int hostname_cmp(const char *a, const char *b)
+ }
+ }
+
+-static int prove_non_existence_nsec(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, unsigned char **nsecs, int nsec_count,
+- char *workspace1, char *workspace2, char *name, int type, int *nons)
++static int prove_non_existence_nsec(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, unsigned char **nsecs, unsigned char **labels, int nsec_count,
++ char *workspace1_in, char *workspace2, char *name, int type, int *nons)
+ {
+ int i, rc, rdlen;
+ unsigned char *p, *psave;
+@@ -1419,6 +1421,9 @@ static int prove_non_existence_nsec(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, unsi
+ /* Find NSEC record that proves name doesn't exist */
+ for (i = 0; i < nsec_count; i++)
+ {
++ char *workspace1 = workspace1_in;
++ int sig_labels, name_labels;
++
+ p = nsecs[i];
+ if (!extract_name(header, plen, &p, workspace1, 1, 10))
+ return 0;
+@@ -1427,7 +1432,27 @@ static int prove_non_existence_nsec(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, unsi
+ psave = p;
+ if (!extract_name(header, plen, &p, workspace2, 1, 10))
+ return 0;
+-
++
++ /* If NSEC comes from wildcard expansion, use original wildcard
++ as name for computation. */
++ sig_labels = *labels[i];
++ name_labels = count_labels(workspace1);
++
++ if (sig_labels < name_labels)
++ {
++ int k;
++ for (k = name_labels - sig_labels; k != 0; k--)
++ {
++ while (*workspace1 != '.' && *workspace1 != 0)
++ workspace1++;
++ if (k != 1 && *workspace1 == '.')
++ workspace1++;
++ }
++
++ workspace1--;
++ *workspace1 = '*';
++ }
++
+ rc = hostname_cmp(workspace1, name);
+
+ if (rc == 0)
+@@ -1825,24 +1850,26 @@ static int prove_non_existence_nsec3(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, uns
+
+ static int prove_non_existence(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, char *keyname, char *name, int qtype, int qclass, char *wildname, int *nons)
+ {
+- static unsigned char **nsecset = NULL;
+- static int nsecset_sz = 0;
++ static unsigned char **nsecset = NULL, **rrsig_labels = NULL;
++ static int nsecset_sz = 0, rrsig_labels_sz = 0;
+
+ int type_found = 0;
+- unsigned char *p = skip_questions(header, plen);
++ unsigned char *auth_start, *p = skip_questions(header, plen);
+ int type, class, rdlen, i, nsecs_found;
+
+ /* Move to NS section */
+ if (!p || !(p = skip_section(p, ntohs(header->ancount), header, plen)))
+ return 0;
++
++ auth_start = p;
+
+ for (nsecs_found = 0, i = ntohs(header->nscount); i != 0; i--)
+ {
+ unsigned char *pstart = p;
+
+- if (!(p = skip_name(p, header, plen, 10)))
++ if (!extract_name(header, plen, &p, daemon->workspacename, 1, 10))
+ return 0;
+-
++
+ GETSHORT(type, p);
+ GETSHORT(class, p);
+ p += 4; /* TTL */
+@@ -1859,7 +1886,69 @@ static int prove_non_existence(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, char *key
+ if (!expand_workspace(&nsecset, &nsecset_sz, nsecs_found))
+ return 0;
+
+- nsecset[nsecs_found++] = pstart;
++ if (type == T_NSEC)
++ {
++ /* If we're looking for NSECs, find the corresponding SIGs, to
++ extract the labels value, which we need in case the NSECs
++ are the result of wildcard expansion.
++ Note that the NSEC may not have been validated yet
++ so if there are multiple SIGs, make sure the label value
++ is the same in all, to avoid be duped by a rogue one.
++ If there are no SIGs, that's an error */
++ unsigned char *p1 = auth_start;
++ int res, j, rdlen1, type1, class1;
++
++ if (!expand_workspace(&rrsig_labels, &rrsig_labels_sz, nsecs_found))
++ return 0;
++
++ rrsig_labels[nsecs_found] = NULL;
++
++ for (j = ntohs(header->nscount); j != 0; j--)
++ {
++ if (!(res = extract_name(header, plen, &p1, daemon->workspacename, 0, 10)))
++ return 0;
++
++ GETSHORT(type1, p1);
++ GETSHORT(class1, p1);
++ p1 += 4; /* TTL */
++ GETSHORT(rdlen1, p1);
++
++ if (!CHECK_LEN(header, p1, plen, rdlen1))
++ return 0;
++
++ if (res == 1 && class1 == qclass && type1 == T_RRSIG)
++ {
++ int type_covered;
++ unsigned char *psav = p1;
++
++ if (rdlen < 18)
++ return 0; /* bad packet */
++
++ GETSHORT(type_covered, p1);
++
++ if (type_covered == T_NSEC)
++ {
++ p1++; /* algo */
++
++ /* labels field must be the same in every SIG we find. */
++ if (!rrsig_labels[nsecs_found])
++ rrsig_labels[nsecs_found] = p1;
++ else if (*rrsig_labels[nsecs_found] != *p1) /* algo */
++ return 0;
++ }
++ p1 = psav;
++ }
++
++ if (!ADD_RDLEN(header, p1, plen, rdlen1))
++ return 0;
++ }
++
++ /* Must have found at least one sig. */
++ if (!rrsig_labels[nsecs_found])
++ return 0;
++ }
++
++ nsecset[nsecs_found++] = pstart;
+ }
+
+ if (!ADD_RDLEN(header, p, plen, rdlen))
+@@ -1867,7 +1956,7 @@ static int prove_non_existence(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, char *key
+ }
+
+ if (type_found == T_NSEC)
+- return prove_non_existence_nsec(header, plen, nsecset, nsecs_found, daemon->workspacename, keyname, name, qtype, nons);
++ return prove_non_existence_nsec(header, plen, nsecset, rrsig_labels, nsecs_found, daemon->workspacename, keyname, name, qtype, nons);
+ else if (type_found == T_NSEC3)
+ return prove_non_existence_nsec3(header, plen, nsecset, nsecs_found, daemon->workspacename, keyname, name, qtype, wildname, nons);
+ else
+--
+2.19.0
+
--
2.19.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [sumo] [meta-networking] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: CVE-2017-15107
2018-09-24 19:21 [sumo] [meta-networking] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: CVE-2017-15107 Sinan Kaya
@ 2018-09-24 22:14 ` akuster808
2018-09-24 23:09 ` Sinan Kaya
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: akuster808 @ 2018-09-24 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sinan Kaya, openembedded-devel
Sinan,
Changes for meta-openembedded should be sent to "
openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org "
I went ahead and pulled this in.
On 09/24/2018 12:21 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> * CVE-2017-15107
> A vulnerability was found in Dnsmasq's implementation of DNSSEC.
> Wildcard synthesized NSEC records could be improperly interpreted
> to prove the non-existence of hostnames that actually exist.
>
> Affects dnsmasq <= 2.78
Thanks for adding the above.
>
> CVE: CVE-2017-15107
> Ref: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2017-15107
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb | 1 +
> .../dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch | 262 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 263 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb
> index 4d1dc6e69..d2465f82d 100644
> --- a/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb
> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/dnsmasq_2.78.bb
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require dnsmasq.inc
>
> SRC_URI += "\
> file://lua.patch \
> + file://CVE-2017-15107.patch \
> "
>
> SRC_URI[dnsmasq-2.78.md5sum] = "3bb97f264c73853f802bf70610150788"
> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch b/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..da2af56cf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/dnsmasq/files/CVE-2017-15107.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
> +From 5a56e1b78a753d3295564daddc9ce389cc69fd68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Simon Kelley <simon@thekelleys.org.uk>
> +Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:26:08 +0000
> +Subject: [PATCH] DNSSEC fix for wildcard NSEC records. CVE-2017-15107 applies.
> +
> +It's OK for NSEC records to be expanded from wildcards,
> +but in that case, the proof of non-existence is only valid
> +starting at the wildcard name, *.<domain> NOT the name expanded
> +from the wildcard. Without this check it's possible for an
> +attacker to craft an NSEC which wrongly proves non-existence
> +in a domain which includes a wildcard for NSEC.
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Backport [http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=4fe6744a220eddd3f1749b40cac3dfc510787de6]
Missing the CVE tag in the patch;
CVE: CVE-2017-15107
I just added it and have it in my test branch
thanks
Armin
> +Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>
> +---
> + CHANGELOG | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
> + src/dnssec.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> + 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> +
> +diff --git a/CHANGELOG b/CHANGELOG
> +index 075fe1a6..5226dce8 100644
> +--- a/CHANGELOG
> ++++ b/CHANGELOG
> +@@ -1,3 +1,47 @@
> ++version 2.79
> ++ Fix parsing of CNAME arguments, which are confused by extra spaces.
> ++ Thanks to Diego Aguirre for spotting the bug.
> ++
> ++ Where available, use IP_UNICAST_IF or IPV6_UNICAST_IF to bind
> ++ upstream servers to an interface, rather than SO_BINDTODEVICE.
> ++ Thanks to Beniamino Galvani for the patch.
> ++
> ++ Always return a SERVFAIL answer to DNS queries without the
> ++ recursion desired bit set, UNLESS acting as an authoritative
> ++ DNS server. This avoids a potential route to cache snooping.
> ++
> ++ Add support for Ed25519 signatures in DNSSEC validation.
> ++
> ++ No longer support RSA/MD5 signatures in DNSSEC validation,
> ++ since these are not secure. This behaviour is mandated in
> ++ RFC-6944.
> ++
> ++ Fix incorrect error exit code from dhcp_release6 utility.
> ++ Thanks Gaudenz Steinlin for the bug report.
> ++
> ++ Use SIGINT (instead of overloading SIGHUP) to turn on DNSSEC
> ++ time validation when --dnssec-no-timecheck is in use.
> ++ Note that this is an incompatible change from earlier releases.
> ++
> ++ Allow more than one --bridge-interface option to refer to an
> ++ interface, so that we can use
> ++ --bridge-interface=int1,alias1
> ++ --bridge-interface=int1,alias2
> ++ as an alternative to
> ++ --bridge-interface=int1,alias1,alias2
> ++ Thanks to Neil Jerram for work on this.
> ++
> ++ Fix for DNSSEC with wildcard-derived NSEC records.
> ++ It's OK for NSEC records to be expanded from wildcards,
> ++ but in that case, the proof of non-existence is only valid
> ++ starting at the wildcard name, *.<domain> NOT the name expanded
> ++ from the wildcard. Without this check it's possible for an
> ++ attacker to craft an NSEC which wrongly proves non-existence.
> ++ Thanks to Ralph Dolmans for finding this, and co-ordinating
> ++ the vulnerability tracking and fix release.
> ++ CVE-2017-15107 applies.
> ++
> ++
> + version 2.78
> + Fix logic of appending ".<layer>" to PXE basename. Thanks to Chris
> + Novakovic for the patch.
> +diff --git a/src/dnssec.c b/src/dnssec.c
> +index a74d01ab..1417be56 100644
> +--- a/src/dnssec.c
> ++++ b/src/dnssec.c
> +@@ -424,15 +424,17 @@ static void from_wire(char *name)
> + static int count_labels(char *name)
> + {
> + int i;
> +-
> ++ char *p;
> ++
> + if (*name == 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> +- for (i = 0; *name; name++)
> +- if (*name == '.')
> ++ for (p = name, i = 0; *p; p++)
> ++ if (*p == '.')
> + i++;
> +
> +- return i+1;
> ++ /* Don't count empty first label. */
> ++ return *name == '.' ? i : i+1;
> + }
> +
> + /* Implement RFC1982 wrapped compare for 32-bit numbers */
> +@@ -1405,8 +1407,8 @@ static int hostname_cmp(const char *a, const char *b)
> + }
> + }
> +
> +-static int prove_non_existence_nsec(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, unsigned char **nsecs, int nsec_count,
> +- char *workspace1, char *workspace2, char *name, int type, int *nons)
> ++static int prove_non_existence_nsec(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, unsigned char **nsecs, unsigned char **labels, int nsec_count,
> ++ char *workspace1_in, char *workspace2, char *name, int type, int *nons)
> + {
> + int i, rc, rdlen;
> + unsigned char *p, *psave;
> +@@ -1419,6 +1421,9 @@ static int prove_non_existence_nsec(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, unsi
> + /* Find NSEC record that proves name doesn't exist */
> + for (i = 0; i < nsec_count; i++)
> + {
> ++ char *workspace1 = workspace1_in;
> ++ int sig_labels, name_labels;
> ++
> + p = nsecs[i];
> + if (!extract_name(header, plen, &p, workspace1, 1, 10))
> + return 0;
> +@@ -1427,7 +1432,27 @@ static int prove_non_existence_nsec(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, unsi
> + psave = p;
> + if (!extract_name(header, plen, &p, workspace2, 1, 10))
> + return 0;
> +-
> ++
> ++ /* If NSEC comes from wildcard expansion, use original wildcard
> ++ as name for computation. */
> ++ sig_labels = *labels[i];
> ++ name_labels = count_labels(workspace1);
> ++
> ++ if (sig_labels < name_labels)
> ++ {
> ++ int k;
> ++ for (k = name_labels - sig_labels; k != 0; k--)
> ++ {
> ++ while (*workspace1 != '.' && *workspace1 != 0)
> ++ workspace1++;
> ++ if (k != 1 && *workspace1 == '.')
> ++ workspace1++;
> ++ }
> ++
> ++ workspace1--;
> ++ *workspace1 = '*';
> ++ }
> ++
> + rc = hostname_cmp(workspace1, name);
> +
> + if (rc == 0)
> +@@ -1825,24 +1850,26 @@ static int prove_non_existence_nsec3(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, uns
> +
> + static int prove_non_existence(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, char *keyname, char *name, int qtype, int qclass, char *wildname, int *nons)
> + {
> +- static unsigned char **nsecset = NULL;
> +- static int nsecset_sz = 0;
> ++ static unsigned char **nsecset = NULL, **rrsig_labels = NULL;
> ++ static int nsecset_sz = 0, rrsig_labels_sz = 0;
> +
> + int type_found = 0;
> +- unsigned char *p = skip_questions(header, plen);
> ++ unsigned char *auth_start, *p = skip_questions(header, plen);
> + int type, class, rdlen, i, nsecs_found;
> +
> + /* Move to NS section */
> + if (!p || !(p = skip_section(p, ntohs(header->ancount), header, plen)))
> + return 0;
> ++
> ++ auth_start = p;
> +
> + for (nsecs_found = 0, i = ntohs(header->nscount); i != 0; i--)
> + {
> + unsigned char *pstart = p;
> +
> +- if (!(p = skip_name(p, header, plen, 10)))
> ++ if (!extract_name(header, plen, &p, daemon->workspacename, 1, 10))
> + return 0;
> +-
> ++
> + GETSHORT(type, p);
> + GETSHORT(class, p);
> + p += 4; /* TTL */
> +@@ -1859,7 +1886,69 @@ static int prove_non_existence(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, char *key
> + if (!expand_workspace(&nsecset, &nsecset_sz, nsecs_found))
> + return 0;
> +
> +- nsecset[nsecs_found++] = pstart;
> ++ if (type == T_NSEC)
> ++ {
> ++ /* If we're looking for NSECs, find the corresponding SIGs, to
> ++ extract the labels value, which we need in case the NSECs
> ++ are the result of wildcard expansion.
> ++ Note that the NSEC may not have been validated yet
> ++ so if there are multiple SIGs, make sure the label value
> ++ is the same in all, to avoid be duped by a rogue one.
> ++ If there are no SIGs, that's an error */
> ++ unsigned char *p1 = auth_start;
> ++ int res, j, rdlen1, type1, class1;
> ++
> ++ if (!expand_workspace(&rrsig_labels, &rrsig_labels_sz, nsecs_found))
> ++ return 0;
> ++
> ++ rrsig_labels[nsecs_found] = NULL;
> ++
> ++ for (j = ntohs(header->nscount); j != 0; j--)
> ++ {
> ++ if (!(res = extract_name(header, plen, &p1, daemon->workspacename, 0, 10)))
> ++ return 0;
> ++
> ++ GETSHORT(type1, p1);
> ++ GETSHORT(class1, p1);
> ++ p1 += 4; /* TTL */
> ++ GETSHORT(rdlen1, p1);
> ++
> ++ if (!CHECK_LEN(header, p1, plen, rdlen1))
> ++ return 0;
> ++
> ++ if (res == 1 && class1 == qclass && type1 == T_RRSIG)
> ++ {
> ++ int type_covered;
> ++ unsigned char *psav = p1;
> ++
> ++ if (rdlen < 18)
> ++ return 0; /* bad packet */
> ++
> ++ GETSHORT(type_covered, p1);
> ++
> ++ if (type_covered == T_NSEC)
> ++ {
> ++ p1++; /* algo */
> ++
> ++ /* labels field must be the same in every SIG we find. */
> ++ if (!rrsig_labels[nsecs_found])
> ++ rrsig_labels[nsecs_found] = p1;
> ++ else if (*rrsig_labels[nsecs_found] != *p1) /* algo */
> ++ return 0;
> ++ }
> ++ p1 = psav;
> ++ }
> ++
> ++ if (!ADD_RDLEN(header, p1, plen, rdlen1))
> ++ return 0;
> ++ }
> ++
> ++ /* Must have found at least one sig. */
> ++ if (!rrsig_labels[nsecs_found])
> ++ return 0;
> ++ }
> ++
> ++ nsecset[nsecs_found++] = pstart;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ADD_RDLEN(header, p, plen, rdlen))
> +@@ -1867,7 +1956,7 @@ static int prove_non_existence(struct dns_header *header, size_t plen, char *key
> + }
> +
> + if (type_found == T_NSEC)
> +- return prove_non_existence_nsec(header, plen, nsecset, nsecs_found, daemon->workspacename, keyname, name, qtype, nons);
> ++ return prove_non_existence_nsec(header, plen, nsecset, rrsig_labels, nsecs_found, daemon->workspacename, keyname, name, qtype, nons);
> + else if (type_found == T_NSEC3)
> + return prove_non_existence_nsec3(header, plen, nsecset, nsecs_found, daemon->workspacename, keyname, name, qtype, wildname, nons);
> + else
> +--
> +2.19.0
> +
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [sumo] [meta-networking] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: CVE-2017-15107
2018-09-24 22:14 ` akuster808
@ 2018-09-24 23:09 ` Sinan Kaya
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sinan Kaya @ 2018-09-24 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akuster808, openembedded-devel
On 9/24/2018 6:14 PM, akuster808 wrote:
> Changes for meta-openembedded should be sent to "
> openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org "
>
> I went ahead and pulled this in.
Thanks, I posted there too after seeing the patch failure. I'm finding
my around different lists.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-24 23:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-24 19:21 [sumo] [meta-networking] [PATCH v1] dnsmasq: CVE-2017-15107 Sinan Kaya
2018-09-24 22:14 ` akuster808
2018-09-24 23:09 ` Sinan Kaya
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox