Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] dnsmasq: merge dnsmasq-dbus to main recipe

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Sunday 14 April 2013 16:09:21 Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Sunday 14 April 2013 17:04:23 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 04:01:59PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > > On Sunday 14 April 2013 15:49:34 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > > * they conflict in sysroot anyway, should be converted to
> > > > PACKAGECONFIG
> > > > 
> > > >   but because dbus is already built in most images I'll let it for
> > > >   someone
> > > >   who has such use-case
> > > 
> > > Hang on a sec, I agree it's good to get rid of this second recipe, but
> > > you're changing the default - so at least give people a way to influence
> > > it. It's not too hard to put in PACKAGECONFIG now while you're changing
> > > the recipe anyway.
> > 
> > is there someone who needs dnsmasq without dbus?
> 
> It's not too hard to imagine a minimal system that wants one and not the
> other. We had two recipes originally for a reason. Sure, it's fine if you're
> already using something that uses dbus and therefore you'll have it anyway,
> but not everyone is in the same situation.

FYI, I already have a patch to do this coming as part of my meta-networking 
moves patchset which I am re-applying at the moment.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre