Re: [meta-oe][PATCH] dnsmasq: merge dnsmasq-dbus to main recipe

[Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>]

On Sunday 14 April 2013 17:04:23 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 04:01:59PM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 April 2013 15:49:34 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > * they conflict in sysroot anyway, should be converted to PACKAGECONFIG
> > > 
> > >   but because dbus is already built in most images I'll let it for
> > >   someone
> > >   who has such use-case
> > 
> > Hang on a sec, I agree it's good to get rid of this second recipe, but
> > you're changing the default - so at least give people a way to influence
> > it. It's not too hard to put in PACKAGECONFIG now while you're changing
> > the recipe anyway.
>
> is there someone who needs dnsmasq without dbus?

It's not too hard to imagine a minimal system that wants one and not the 
other. We had two recipes originally for a reason. Sure, it's fine if you're 
already using something that uses dbus and therefore you'll have it anyway, 
but not everyone is in the same situation.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre