Initial work on an Android SDK via openembedded

Initial work on an Android SDK via openembedded

[Angus Lees]

Just an FYI:

I put together an alternative Android NDK using Openembedded:
 git://github.com/anguslees/openembedded-android.git

It currently uses the prebuilt Android libc (bionic) and various tools
from the Google Android NDK/SDK, but builds gcc, etc from Openembedded
source.  I expect to expand it to build the other pieces from source
eventually.  I had to patch the gcc and other recipies a little, which
is why it's a git branch rather than a self-contained bitbake
collection.

This is my first-ever look at bitbake or openembedded, so apologies if
any of the recipies are atrocious ;)

(Totally unsupported by Google.  I work for Google but don't work on
anything to do with Android - I just happen to have an Android handset
and a desire to write native apps for it in my free time)

-- 
 - Gus

Re: Initial work on an Android SDK via openembedded

[Michael 'Mickey' Lauer]

Awesome, congrats!

Please keep up that work, it certainly would be very interesting for
OpenEmbedded.

Cheers,

-- 
:M:

Re: Initial work on an Android SDK via openembedded

[GNUtoo]

On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 15:46 +1000, Angus Lees wrote:
> Just an FYI:
> 
> I put together an alternative Android NDK using Openembedded:
>  git://github.com/anguslees/openembedded-android.git
> 
> It currently uses the prebuilt Android libc (bionic) and various tools
> from the Google Android NDK/SDK, but builds gcc, etc from Openembedded
> source.  I expect to expand it to build the other pieces from source
> eventually.  I had to patch the gcc and other recipies a little, which
> is why it's a git branch rather than a self-contained bitbake
> collection.
> 
> This is my first-ever look at bitbake or openembedded, so apologies if
> any of the recipies are atrocious ;)
> 
> (Totally unsupported by Google.  I work for Google but don't work on
> anything to do with Android - I just happen to have an Android handset
> and a desire to write native apps for it in my free time)
> 
WOW!!! great!!!

Denis.

Patchwork

[Konrad Mattheis]

Hi,

I found a lot of nice patches from ulf samuelson for the new at91sam9g45 in the patchwork.
What is the usual way, that they get included.


bye
Konrad

Re: Patchwork

[Philip Balister]

On 04/15/2010 01:56 PM, Konrad Mattheis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found a lot of nice patches from ulf samuelson for the new at91sam9g45 in the patchwork.
> What is the usual way, that they get included.

If you test them send a suitable Acked-by to the list.

Philip

>
>
> bye
> Konrad
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

patchwork

[akuster808]

Hello OE folk,

My apologies for cross posting.

Who is the Admin for Patchwork?

I would like additional privileges to manage the "Yocto Project Layers"
queue.

Also, I would like additional  privileges to add new branches for any
oe, meta-oe queues & yp layers.

kind regards,
Armin

Re: patchwork

[akuster808]

ok, so no Admins. This is unexceptionable.

OE TSC and Board, I believe its your time to get involved.

regards,
Armin

On 5/3/19 10:18 AM, akuster808 wrote:
> Hello OE folk,
>
> My apologies for cross posting.
>
> Who is the Admin for Patchwork?
>
> I would like additional privileges to manage the "Yocto Project Layers"
> queue.
>
> Also, I would like additional  privileges to add new branches for any
> oe, meta-oe queues & yp layers.
>
> kind regards,
> Armin
>