From: Thilo Fromm <t.fromm@dresearch.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libunwind: force gcc to be built first
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:47:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CA46AD8.2070205@dresearch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikWLrAZaejWvnBGf4hn0CdKV2FgYiMxLEkDn+Wi@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/30/2010 12:21 PM, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
>> It looks like libunwind provides header files that are named
>> identically to gcc header files. gcc then confuses these headers when it
>> is built, causing a break of the build.
>>
>> This patch makes libunwind depend on gcc which resolves the build issue. Both
>> build nicely when gcc is built first.
>
> Hm. Ideally this should be patched in gcc.
I don't think this is a gcc issue. It's a reasonable point of view,
right, but pushing the header file issue back to libunwind is a valid
POV, too. I think it's rather a problem between those two packages.
> Now I feel that if someone
> does a bitbake libunwind; bitbake -cclean gcc; bitbake gcc things
> still fail.
Did you give this a try? I'll check it as soon as I can.
> Btw what include files are we talking about?
I took word from Steffen (Sledz) about the cause of the problem, so I
didn't investigate any further. Introducing the dependency seemed to fix
the problem, so why bother. However, I feel like this kind of problem is
better fixed (the way you're proposing it) by the package maintainer, if
there is one.
Regards,
Thilo
--
Dipl.-Ing (FH) Thilo Fromm, MSc., Embedded Systems Developer
DResearch Digital Media Systems GmbH
Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, D-10319 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 (30) 515 932 228 mailto:t.fromm@dresearch.de
Fax: +49 (30) 515 932 77 http://www.dresearch.de
Amtsgericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB:54412
Ust.-IDNr. DE169013825; WEEE Reg.-Nr. DE 85995642
Geschäftsführer: Dr. M. Weber, W. Mögle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-30 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-29 16:17 [PATCH] libunwind: force gcc to be built first Thilo Fromm
2010-09-30 8:49 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-09-30 10:21 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-30 10:47 ` Thilo Fromm [this message]
2010-09-30 11:30 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-01 10:09 ` Thilo Fromm
2010-10-01 17:16 ` Khem Raj
2010-10-02 6:33 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-04 8:08 ` Thilo Fromm
2010-10-04 16:00 ` Khem Raj
2011-02-14 8:32 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-02-14 17:27 ` Tom Rini
2011-02-14 17:58 ` Khem Raj
2011-02-14 19:10 ` Sledz, Steffen
2011-02-25 8:51 ` Steffen Sledz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CA46AD8.2070205@dresearch.de \
--to=t.fromm@dresearch.de \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox