Openembedded Devel Discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Sledz <sledz@dresearch.de>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libunwind: force gcc to be built first
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 09:51:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D676D7D.3050408@dresearch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB561678F08F554EB0D9F21B70E268A505AF9A@exchange.intern.dresearch.de>

Am 14.02.2011 20:10, schrieb Sledz, Steffen:
> Am 14.02.2011 18:58, schrieb Khem Raj:
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Steffen Sledz <sledz@dresearch.de> wrote:
>>> Am 04.10.2010 18:00, schrieb Khem Raj:
>>>> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:08 AM, Thilo Fromm <t.fromm@dresearch.de> wrote:
>>>>> Hello Frans,
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I tracked it down - libunwind publishes unwind.h, and gcc uses an
>>>>>>>> internal
>>>>>>>> file of the same name while being built.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes gcc has its own version of libunwind which it used unless
>>>>>>> configured with --with-system-libunwind
>>>>>>> IIUC the problem happens with target gcc not with cross-gcc. target
>>>>>>> gcc is built using cross-gcc and
>>>>>>> <sysroot>/use/include could be preferred over the location of
>>>>>>> libunwind.h which is in gcc sources
>>>>>>> If thats the case then we need to fix gcc build to not look into
>>>>>>> standard sysroot/usr/include but prefer
>>>>>>> the local unwind.h when its using internal libunwind. The problem
>>>>>>> would not show up if the libunwind versions
>>>>>>> were matching but that may not be the case always and I dont know of
>>>>>>> hand how we can fix the gcc configury/build
>>>>>>> to ignore installed unwind.h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You workaround would only work if build sequence was followed if some
>>>>>>> one just cleaned gcc and rebuild it
>>>>>>> the problem will resurface.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the analysis Khem.
>>>>>> This is indeed more or less what I had expected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For me this patch gets a NAK as it does only masks the problvem in
>>>>>> some cases but not really solves it.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're right with this analysis; however, the patch enables Openembedded to
>>>>> be built *at all*. If you care less about whether you're able to actually
>>>>> build and if you have the time to wait until someone ventures deep into the
>>>>> gcc build and fixes the cause, then this is the way to go.
>>>>>
>>>>> For us, however, this patch is a valid workaround. It will make Openembedded
>>>>> work for us until the original issue is fixed.
>>>>
>>>> I think we should try to fix it in right way.
>>>
>>> Ping!
>>
>> I think this patch does not fix the problem but hides it. It will not
>> be worth to get it upstream
> 
> That's right.
> 
> I read your comment from october 1st that you try to fix this "in the right way" by fixing "the gcc build to not look into standard sysroot/usr/include but prefer the local unwind.h when its using internal libunwind".

Ping!

-- 
DResearch Fahrzeugelektronik GmbH
Otto-Schmirgal-Str. 3, 10319 Berlin, Germany
Tel: +49 30 515932-237 mailto:sledz@DResearch.de
Fax: +49 30 515932-299
Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Weber, Werner Mögle;
Amtsgericht Berlin Charlottenburg; HRB 130120 B;
Ust.-IDNr. DE273952058




      reply	other threads:[~2011-02-25  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-29 16:17 [PATCH] libunwind: force gcc to be built first Thilo Fromm
2010-09-30  8:49 ` Steffen Sledz
2010-09-30 10:21 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-09-30 10:47   ` Thilo Fromm
2010-09-30 11:30     ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-01 10:09       ` Thilo Fromm
2010-10-01 17:16         ` Khem Raj
2010-10-02  6:33           ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-10-04  8:08             ` Thilo Fromm
2010-10-04 16:00               ` Khem Raj
2011-02-14  8:32                 ` Steffen Sledz
2011-02-14 17:27                   ` Tom Rini
2011-02-14 17:58                   ` Khem Raj
2011-02-14 19:10                     ` Sledz, Steffen
2011-02-25  8:51                       ` Steffen Sledz [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D676D7D.3050408@dresearch.de \
    --to=sledz@dresearch.de \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox