From: Tom Rini <tom_rini@mentor.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] task-base: conditional wifi and bluetooth tasks in PACKAGES
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2011 08:01:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D52AC3D.4050906@mentor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <iiu4qb$8st$1@dough.gmane.org>
On 02/09/2011 06:28 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09-02-11 13:59, Filip Zyzniewski wrote:
>> On 2/9/11, Marcin Juszkiewicz<marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> This change is bogus. You just remove building of BT/Wifi support for
>>> "bitbake
>>> bootstrap-image" for your machine not distro. Use DISTRO_FEATURES instead
>>> and
>>> then remove "bluetooth wifi" from DISTRO_FEATURES in your distribution
>>> config
>>> file.
>>
>> The whole point of this patch is to make task-base honour features.
>> Without this change bluez (and in consequence avahi, gstreamer, gtk, x
>> libs) gets built regardless of features setting.
>
> That's the whole point of task-base, to get things built. You can then
> use machine_features to install them by default or not.
>
> Again, noone is forcing you to use task-base, so no need to break it for
> everyone else like your patch is doing.
But it's also kinda annoying when you opt out of task-base.
So let me put on the apparently stupid hat today. Looking at task-base
today. PACKAGES always has task-base-{wifi,bluetooth}. task-base will
RDEPEND on it iff DISTRO and MACHINE set the appropriate feature. Then
in task-base-extended RDEPENDS we have logic to do the common $bus I/O
thing I was talking about.
So... wouldn't making the patch be DISTRO_FEATURES rather than
MACHINE_FEATURES be what people want?
--
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 22:13 [PATCH] task-base: conditional wifi and bluetooth tasks in PACKAGES Filip Zyzniewski
2011-02-08 17:29 ` Tom Rini
2011-02-08 18:16 ` Mike Westerhof
2011-02-08 18:23 ` Koen Kooi
2011-02-08 20:39 ` Filip Zyzniewski
2011-02-08 21:04 ` Koen Kooi
2011-02-08 21:22 ` Filip Zyzniewski
2011-02-08 21:25 ` Tom Rini
2011-02-08 21:30 ` Tom Rini
2011-02-09 9:17 ` Filip Zyzniewski
2011-02-08 20:59 ` Douglas Royds
2011-02-08 21:08 ` Eric Bénard
2011-02-08 22:16 ` Koen Kooi
2011-02-08 22:18 ` Eric Bénard
2011-02-09 6:05 ` Filip Zyzniewski
2011-02-09 9:39 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2011-02-09 12:59 ` Filip Zyzniewski
2011-02-09 13:28 ` Koen Kooi
2011-02-09 13:43 ` Filip Zyzniewski
2011-02-09 15:01 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2011-02-09 15:22 ` Phil Blundell
2011-02-09 15:46 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D52AC3D.4050906@mentor.com \
--to=tom_rini@mentor.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox