Re: [oe-core] ld segfault cant figure it out

[Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>]

On 2012-04-16 16:11, j wrote:
> On 04/13/2012 03:50 PM, j wrote:
>> On 04/13/2012 03:46 PM, j wrote:
>>> There seems to be a couple of packages when I build that cause ld segfaults such as
>>> [ 6635.846581] ld[14419]: segfault at 8 ip 0077f1bf sp bfbf4a8c error 4 in libc-2.13.so[73d000+15c000]
>>> [ 6656.831878] ld[20772]: segfault at 8 ip 00ba61bf sp bfaf1bfc error 4 in libc-2.13.so[b64000+15c000]
>>>
>>> I can not seem to be able to track down the package/packages that are causing this. I have tried with a clean build dir and only building nano and I get it so it is something in
>>> the getting environment ready steps. Is there a way I can easily track down the build/builds that are causing this? Am I even on the right track in this thinking? Nothing fails
>>> to build and other than task-native-sdk all result in what seem to be working packages.
>>>
>>> Any info on what or how to figure it out would be greatly appreciated.
>>> building for bbxm on 11.04(uptodate), build environment setup with Angstrom scripts and all is up to date.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>> Sorry forgot the info from qa.log
>>
>> libgcc-4.5: non -staticdev package contains static .a library: libgcc-dev path
>> '/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libgcc-4.5-r48+svnr184907/packages-split/libgcc-dev/usr/lib/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/4.5.4/libgcc.a'
>> libgcc-4.5: non -staticdev package contains static .a library: libgcc-dev path
>> '/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libgcc-4.5-r48+svnr184907/packages-split/libgcc-dev/usr/lib/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/4.5.4/libgcov.a'
>> libgcc-4.5: non -staticdev package contains static .a library: libgcc-dev path
>> '/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libgcc-4.5-r48+svnr184907/packages-split/libgcc-dev/usr/lib/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/4.5.4/libgcc_eh.a'
>> bash-4.2: bash: Found a reference to /usr/ in
>> /home/beagle/OE/setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/bash-4.2-r2/packages-split/bash/bin/bashbug
>> bash-4.2: Shell scripts in base_bindir and base_sbindir should not reference anything in exec_prefix
>>
>> Any other places to check, as these I do not think relate to a segfault?
>
> I have now tried the build on 3 different OS's the most recent being Arch. All give the same QA log's and all give me segfaults. That are all basically close to the same errors
> just differing libc versions.
>
> I have tried Ubuntu 10.04 11.04 Fedora 16 and now Arch. What is causing the segfaults? Is it what is in the QA log?
>
>
>
> Most current
> [ 6433.379801] ld[22955]: segfault at 403 ip 00007f703ddcc435 sp 00007fffb0bd9f50 error 4 in libc-2.15.so[7f703dd85000+197000]
> [ 6444.526227] ld[31806]: segfault at 403 ip 00007f0dffc51435 sp 00007fffc0a990d0 error 4 in libc-2.15.so[7f0dffc0a000+197000]
>
> libgcc-4.5: non -staticdev package contains static .a library: libgcc-dev path
> '/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libgcc-4.5-r48+svnr184907/packages-split/libgcc-dev/usr/lib/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/4.5.4/libgcc_eh.a'
> libgcc-4.5: non -staticdev package contains static .a library: libgcc-dev path
> '/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libgcc-4.5-r48+svnr184907/packages-split/libgcc-dev/usr/lib/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/4.5.4/libgcc.a'
> libgcc-4.5: non -staticdev package contains static .a library: libgcc-dev path
> '/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/libgcc-4.5-r48+svnr184907/packages-split/libgcc-dev/usr/lib/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/4.5.4/libgcov.a'
> bash-4.2: bash: Found a reference to /usr/ in
> /home/gusterson/OpenEmbed/setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/bash-4.2-r2/packages-split/bash/bin/bashbug
> bash-4.2: Shell scripts in base_bindir and base_sbindir should not reference anything in exec_prefix
>
>
> The only reason I am concerned with this and it may be un related is that every time I build task-native-sdk it does not build a working sdk for my device. BB-xm. Yes I know I can
> install one from the repo, but I want to figure out what is wrong with building one for me.
>
> Does anyone have input, advice something?

You've tried different Operating Systems, but one would assume that
this is all on the same hardware?   Have you tried a different build
host (i.e. hardware/box)?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------