From: j <vwyodapink@gmail.com>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe-core] ld segfault cant figure it out
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:16:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8DDDB7.5010605@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8DCFC4.9010508@gmail.com>
On 04/17/2012 01:17 PM, j wrote:
> On 04/17/2012 12:49 PM, j wrote:
>> On 04/17/2012 12:34 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
>>> On 4/17/12 2:09 PM, j wrote:
>>>> On 04/17/2012 09:13 AM, J. L. wrote:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I went for a build on the borrowed machine again but this time I
>>>> did not
>>>> go into X just stayed in RL3. Then ran bitbake perl, on a clean build
>>>> dir. It is just about to finish building a few steps away but where I
>>>> normally get the segfaults, it has not spit those out. There are no QA
>>>> logs being generated either. So looks like it had/has something to do
>>>> with running X, both systems are running nvidia graphics cards. The
>>>> laptop has a new mobile one, borrowed an old one that is nouveau
>>>> compatible. So both open and closed nvidia drivers were tried. But
>>>> something when in the graphical environment is giving the segfault
>>>> issues I have been seeing. I have not yet verified if killing X on the
>>>> laptop builds and eliminates the issues as well.
>>>>
>>>> Will post back once I have built the kernel on both machines with no X
>>>> running.
>>>
>>> There is a known issue w/ nvidia drivers, segfaulting and QEMU. Is
>>> something in perl (or elsewhere) trying to run qemu to finish up a
>>> task?
>>>
>>> --Mark
>> Not that I can tell, but that does not mean it is not (still learning
>> things), but possible one of threads is working on something perl
>> related when it happens and I am not seeing it or realizing it. If
>> you are willing to post the commands I could run to check, I can post
>> the results. But when I do just a bitbake -c compile perl on a clean
>> build dir all I would see was the segfault in dmesg and the results
>> in QA log. Nothing would show up on the command line that was not in
>> the QA log, after doing each step one by one.
>>
>> But it must be related to this known issue with nvidia. Should be a
>> couple hours before both machines finish building the kernel and
>> perl, will post the results after. But looks promising for my laptop
>> so far as no segfaults yet. Borrowed machine is on to building the
>> kernel now and nothing posted yet.
>>
>> Thank you for your response very appreciated. I will also read more
>> about the issue you stated.
>>
>>
> From what I am reading about this is its related to libgl. But on the
> machine I borrowed I used nouveau driver's which uses the libgl that
> is expected not the nvidia's supplied version. So maybe that is not
> fully it. But still all seems related to being in an X environment for
> me when building. Which is at least easy to work around.
>
> Will post if it segfaults again on either machine once they are done.
My borrowed machine segfaulted while finishing building perl. So I guess
that had nothing to do with the segfault issues. I ended up with the
same qa.log output and same type of output on dmesg relating to libc and
ld again.
Laptop no X on that segfaulted in the normal places
Should I try installing Ubuntu 10.04 on the borrowed machine and seeing
if the OS works on that machine? I am still lost as nothing seems to
really be telling me what is segfaulting. The rest of the logs basically
look the same as the series I posted earlier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 22:46 ld segfault cant figure it out j
2012-04-13 22:50 ` j
2012-04-16 22:11 ` [oe-core] " j
2012-04-16 22:28 ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-16 22:32 ` j
2012-04-16 22:41 ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-16 22:54 ` j
2012-04-16 22:34 ` j
2012-04-17 1:43 ` j
2012-04-17 15:41 ` J. L.
2012-04-17 15:54 ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-17 16:11 ` J. L.
2012-04-17 16:13 ` J. L.
2012-04-17 19:09 ` j
2012-04-17 19:34 ` Mark Hatle
2012-04-17 19:49 ` j
2012-04-17 20:17 ` j
2012-04-17 21:16 ` j [this message]
2012-04-18 0:37 ` j
2012-04-18 5:30 ` Khem Raj
2012-04-18 5:40 ` j
2012-04-18 22:00 ` Khem Raj
2012-04-19 3:32 ` j
2012-04-19 6:24 ` Khem Raj
2012-04-20 0:39 ` j
2012-04-20 11:13 ` Gary Thomas
2012-04-20 16:17 ` j
2012-04-20 18:03 ` j
2012-04-21 21:47 ` [oe-core] 3 build machines all failing in the same manner - was:ld " j
2012-04-24 20:39 ` j
2012-04-24 20:44 ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-24 20:57 ` j
2012-04-24 20:57 ` j
2012-04-24 21:03 ` Phil Blundell
2012-04-24 21:15 ` j
2012-04-27 17:16 ` j
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F8DDDB7.5010605@gmail.com \
--to=vwyodapink@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox