Qt5

Qt5

[Tasslehoff Kjappfot]

Is the meta-qt5 layer at https://github.com/meta-qt5 a work in progress,
or should it be usable in its current state?

I currently use qt4-embedded and compile and sdk with qt-support, and
want to try out qt5. Compiling qtbase gave me some packages I can add to
my image, but when I tried to create an SDK I got stuck. The
files/recipes in meta-qt5 differ so much from todays qt4-stuff that I'm
not sure where to begin, but I suspect at least an SDK-recipe/task and
maybe some qt5-embedded recipes will have to be added?

Thought maybe I'd see if I can create these recipes, but I just wanted
to check if that is the plan forward.

- Tasslehoff

Re: Qt5

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1080 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 03:19:45PM +0100, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
> Is the meta-qt5 layer at https://github.com/meta-qt5 a work in progress,
> or should it be usable in its current state?

Not really, but I plan to work on it next week(s).

> I currently use qt4-embedded and compile and sdk with qt-support, and
> want to try out qt5. Compiling qtbase gave me some packages I can add to
> my image, but when I tried to create an SDK I got stuck. The
> files/recipes in meta-qt5 differ so much from todays qt4-stuff that I'm
> not sure where to begin, but I suspect at least an SDK-recipe/task and
> maybe some qt5-embedded recipes will have to be added?

upstream sources also differ a lot, so recipes will stay different to
reflect that.

> Thought maybe I'd see if I can create these recipes, but I just wanted
> to check if that is the plan forward.

If you create something useable send it as pull request on github, I
plan to fix issues in current recipes, but don't plan to work on sdk

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

Re: Qt5

[Tasslehoff Kjappfot]

On 02/22/2013 11:26 PM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 03:19:45PM +0100, Tasslehoff Kjappfot wrote:
>> Is the meta-qt5 layer at https://github.com/meta-qt5 a work in progress,
>> or should it be usable in its current state?
> 
> Not really, but I plan to work on it next week(s).
> 
>> I currently use qt4-embedded and compile and sdk with qt-support, and
>> want to try out qt5. Compiling qtbase gave me some packages I can add to
>> my image, but when I tried to create an SDK I got stuck. The
>> files/recipes in meta-qt5 differ so much from todays qt4-stuff that I'm
>> not sure where to begin, but I suspect at least an SDK-recipe/task and
>> maybe some qt5-embedded recipes will have to be added?
> 
> upstream sources also differ a lot, so recipes will stay different to
> reflect that.
> 
>> Thought maybe I'd see if I can create these recipes, but I just wanted
>> to check if that is the plan forward.
> 
> If you create something useable send it as pull request on github, I
> plan to fix issues in current recipes, but don't plan to work on sdk
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> 

Will do, thanks for the info.

- Tasslehoff