From: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: checksums situation
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:20:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871vtkvih7.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235654920.6336.33.camel@dax.rpnet.com> (Richard Purdie's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:28:40 +0000")
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net> writes:
[...]
> For checksum.ini I'm proposing we'd go through BBPATH and append all the
> checksum.ini files found together to form one large complete version.
> People's overlay/collections can then supplement the checksum data
> easily. There certainly isn't a technical reason I can see why this
> wouldn't work.
I fully agree that this is technically possible and even a desired
feature if we stay with a checksums.ini file however I fail to see how
it could help to solve the total mess we have in current checksums.ini
commits.
Even worse is the lack of a policy to add/change items there.
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 16:28 checksums situation Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-02-13 17:08 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-13 17:39 ` Ihar Hrachyshka
2009-02-13 18:37 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-13 19:35 ` Leon Woestenberg
2010-02-12 18:45 ` mike
2009-02-13 19:41 ` John Willis
2009-02-15 10:04 ` Phil Blundell
2009-02-15 18:32 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-13 17:09 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-13 17:28 ` Andrea Adami
2009-02-13 17:34 ` Andrea Adami
2009-02-13 18:02 ` Koen Kooi
2009-02-14 14:51 ` Yuri Bushmelev
2009-02-24 6:46 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 6:51 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 8:49 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-02-24 15:02 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 16:13 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-02-24 16:25 ` Angus Ainslie
2009-02-24 16:37 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 16:28 ` Philip Balister
2009-02-24 16:36 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 22:10 ` GNUtoo
2009-02-24 22:17 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 22:29 ` Phil Blundell
2009-02-24 22:42 ` GNUtoo
2009-02-25 9:09 ` Richard Purdie
2009-02-25 23:04 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-02-26 13:28 ` Richard Purdie
2009-02-27 0:20 ` Otavio Salvador [this message]
2009-02-24 18:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-24 18:36 ` Ihar Hrachyshka
2009-02-24 18:50 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 22:20 ` GNUtoo
2009-02-25 2:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-25 2:25 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-25 9:01 ` Richard Purdie
2009-02-25 21:27 ` Vitus Jensen
2009-02-25 21:35 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-25 22:04 ` Vitus Jensen
2009-02-26 8:10 ` Koen Kooi
2009-02-26 12:50 ` Bernhard Guillon
2009-02-28 9:57 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2009-02-28 10:45 ` Koen Kooi
2009-02-28 10:51 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2009-02-28 13:12 ` Philip Balister
2009-02-24 20:29 ` Bernhard Guillon
2009-02-24 22:45 ` GNUtoo
2009-02-25 9:16 ` Koen Kooi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-24 20:00 Frans Meulenbroeks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871vtkvih7.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br \
--to=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox