From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: checksums situation
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:10:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <go5ipr$nvl$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <go4f92$khh$2@ger.gmane.org>
On 25-02-09 23:04, Vitus Jensen wrote:
> If this leads you to abandon checksums alltogether: the current situation
> protects against corrupt downloads and otherwise undetected updates from
> upstream and I'm all for keeping such a protection.
I get reports pretty much every single week about someone asking "what
does 'checksum failed' mean" when their download is corrupt due to evil
proxies and bad disks. It's a lot easier and faster to debug than
seemingly random build failures.
regards,
Koen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-26 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-13 16:28 checksums situation Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-02-13 17:08 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-13 17:39 ` Ihar Hrachyshka
2009-02-13 18:37 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-13 19:35 ` Leon Woestenberg
2010-02-12 18:45 ` mike
2009-02-13 19:41 ` John Willis
2009-02-15 10:04 ` Phil Blundell
2009-02-15 18:32 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-13 17:09 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-13 17:28 ` Andrea Adami
2009-02-13 17:34 ` Andrea Adami
2009-02-13 18:02 ` Koen Kooi
2009-02-14 14:51 ` Yuri Bushmelev
2009-02-24 6:46 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 6:51 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 8:49 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-02-24 15:02 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 16:13 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-02-24 16:25 ` Angus Ainslie
2009-02-24 16:37 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 16:28 ` Philip Balister
2009-02-24 16:36 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 22:10 ` GNUtoo
2009-02-24 22:17 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 22:29 ` Phil Blundell
2009-02-24 22:42 ` GNUtoo
2009-02-25 9:09 ` Richard Purdie
2009-02-25 23:04 ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2009-02-26 13:28 ` Richard Purdie
2009-02-27 0:20 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-24 18:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-24 18:36 ` Ihar Hrachyshka
2009-02-24 18:50 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-24 22:20 ` GNUtoo
2009-02-25 2:01 ` Otavio Salvador
2009-02-25 2:25 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-25 9:01 ` Richard Purdie
2009-02-25 21:27 ` Vitus Jensen
2009-02-25 21:35 ` Tom Rini
2009-02-25 22:04 ` Vitus Jensen
2009-02-26 8:10 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2009-02-26 12:50 ` Bernhard Guillon
2009-02-28 9:57 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2009-02-28 10:45 ` Koen Kooi
2009-02-28 10:51 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2009-02-28 13:12 ` Philip Balister
2009-02-24 20:29 ` Bernhard Guillon
2009-02-24 22:45 ` GNUtoo
2009-02-25 9:16 ` Koen Kooi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-24 20:00 Frans Meulenbroeks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='go5ipr$nvl$1@ger.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox