From: Koen Kooi <k.kooi@student.utwente.nl>
To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] module-base.bbclass: keep PR if MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is not set
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 19:34:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <hsk1il$v4j$2@dough.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BED85C7.8000909@eukrea.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 14-05-10 19:17, Eric Bénard wrote:
> Le 14/05/2010 17:52, Koen Kooi a écrit :
>> Op 14 mei 2010, om 17:10 heeft Eric Bénard het volgende geschreven:
>>> I was told you are the person to contact about MACHINE_KERNEL_PR so
>>> may you please have a look to the patch below - also available here :
>>> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/2012/
>>>
>>> Actually, when compiling modules (out of tree), we loose PR if
>>> MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is not set.
>>
>> I don't believe that when MACHINE_KERNEL_PR isn't set people care
>> about PR.
>>
> Does that mean that policy is that MACHINE_KERNEL_PR should be set for
> every machine ?
> If yes, maybe this should be added in the doc.
IMO yes, but some people were against it. Either their kernel never
changes or they don't care about out-of-tree modules breaking on kernel
changes.
regards,
Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFL7YmVMkyGM64RGpERAsf2AJ45yUaAIVL0HCm7jCfxwkmq9C5gnACfcV8w
vGcI7BJka3fCXJJ+RL3Y+Yc=
=RLGB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-14 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-03 21:21 [PATCH] module-base.bbclass: keep PR if MACHINE_KERNEL_PR is not set Eric Benard
2010-05-12 15:34 ` Eric Bénard
2010-05-14 15:10 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Eric Bénard
2010-05-14 15:52 ` Koen Kooi
2010-05-14 17:17 ` Eric Bénard
2010-05-14 17:34 ` Koen Kooi [this message]
2010-05-14 17:45 ` Eric Bénard
2010-05-14 19:55 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-14 20:15 ` Eric Bénard
2010-05-14 21:02 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-17 7:12 ` Eric Bénard
2010-05-17 8:02 ` Phil Blundell
2010-05-14 16:25 ` Phil Blundell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='hsk1il$v4j$2@dough.gmane.org' \
--to=k.kooi@student.utwente.nl \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox