qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Matthias Günther]

Hello.

I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).

Should I send the beta1-patch to the ML or is it better to wait for the
final release?

Regards
Matthias

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05-06-10 01:57, Matthias Günther wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
> I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
> just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).
> 
> Should I send the beta1-patch to the ML or is it better to wait for the
> final release?

Please send them to the list so we can work out issues before the
release happens.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMCec0MkyGM64RGpERAl1qAKCDN8/1jFcBE5drz7yMJxPDk/p9OQCdHpVD
VDTzU2ycrWES98T0ZppWCoA=
=iEIh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Martin Jansa]

On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 07:57:09AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> On 05-06-10 01:57, Matthias Günther wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
> > I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
> > just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).
> > 
> > Should I send the beta1-patch to the ML or is it better to wait for the
> > final release?
> 
> Please send them to the list so we can work out issues before the
> release happens.

Matthias: please confirm if they will be the same as you have in 
http://gitorious.org/~matgnt/angstrom/matgnts-openembedded/commits/qt-4.7
or create reabased branch there, it will be easier for some testers to
try your changes :).

Thanks

Regard,

-- 
Jansa 'JaMa' Martin     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Matthias Günther]

On 05.06.2010 08:03, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 07:57:09AM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05-06-10 01:57, Matthias Günther wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
>>> I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
>>> just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).
>>>
>>> Should I send the beta1-patch to the ML or is it better to wait for the
>>> final release?
>>
>> Please send them to the list so we can work out issues before the
>> release happens.
> 
> Matthias: please confirm if they will be the same as you have in 
> http://gitorious.org/~matgnt/angstrom/matgnts-openembedded/commits/qt-4.7
> or create reabased branch there, it will be easier for some testers to
> try your changes :).

I removed the outdated technical preview version, cleaned it up a bit
and rebased onto the latest OE. You can find the temporary branch at:

>http://gitorious.org/~matgnt/angstrom/matgnts-openembedded/commits/tmp-qt-4.7.0-beta1-oe-rebased

Since there have been a lot of changes to OE during the last weeks I'm
currently rebulding from scratch and if everything works fine I will
send the patches to the ML afterwards.

Regards,
Matthias

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Michael 'Mickey' Lauer]

Am Samstag, den 05.06.2010, 01:57 +0200 schrieb Matthias Günther:
> Hello.
> 
> I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
> I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
> just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).
> 
> Should I send the beta1-patch to the ML or is it better to wait for the
> final release?

Feel free to submit it. QML is an amazing technology and I'd love to do
something with it on OE-powered devices.

-- 
:M:

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Matthias Günther]

On 05.06.2010 13:25, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 05.06.2010, 01:57 +0200 schrieb Matthias Günther:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
>> I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
>> just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).
>>
>> Should I send the beta1-patch to the ML or is it better to wait for the
>> final release?
> 
> Feel free to submit it. QML is an amazing technology and I'd love to do
> something with it on OE-powered devices.

If you like QML watch my few QML videos:
>http://www.youtube.com/matgnt

Nothing special, just the Qt examples - but built with OE :)

Regards,
Matthias

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05-06-10 01:57, Matthias Günther wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
> I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
> just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).

At work I need demos/browser to show off some html stuff, do you have an
idea what the effort would be to get it to build again for qt 4.7?

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMCoSFMkyGM64RGpERAmvnAJ9DQXgvLBbBv6eDLSg95+5tLglsBQCfTDTC
MFmL8Wbxvu5oZGg4qiOJEFg=
=jT56
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Matthias Günther]

On 05.06.2010 19:08, Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 05-06-10 01:57, Matthias Günther wrote:
>> Hello.
> 
>> I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
>> I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
>> just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).
> 
> At work I need demos/browser to show off some html stuff, do you have an
> idea what the effort would be to get it to build again for qt 4.7?

I'm not sure. To make it easy I just disabled the not important parts
where compiling errors occured. But I will have a look into it.

Regards,
Matthias

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05-06-10 23:15, Matthias Günther wrote:
> On 05.06.2010 19:08, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> On 05-06-10 01:57, Matthias Günther wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>
>>> I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
>>> I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
>>> just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).
>>
>> At work I need demos/browser to show off some html stuff, do you have an
>> idea what the effort would be to get it to build again for qt 4.7?
> 
> I'm not sure. To make it easy I just disabled the not important parts
> where compiling errors occured. But I will have a look into it.

Thanks, I think it's safe to add the recipes as they are and work on
these things after they are added.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFMC4/dMkyGM64RGpERAvjuAJ97cgPjRbOp2ltmjCONAerBr74pQACggvfT
hbnEY6Qi5hWspsY82U8wW1I=
=Fa23
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: qt4 upgrade to 4.7.0-beta1

[Matthias Günther]

On 06.06.2010 14:09, Koen Kooi wrote:
> On 05-06-10 23:15, Matthias Günther wrote:
>> On 05.06.2010 19:08, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>> On 05-06-10 01:57, Matthias Günther wrote:
>>>> Hello.
>>>
>>>> I've been working with QML (Qt Quick) for some time now and therefore
>>>> I've created recipes for Qt 4.7.0-tp and beta1 versions. The patches
>>>> just disable the not cross compiling parts (e.g. some demos/examples).
>>>
>>> At work I need demos/browser to show off some html stuff, do you have an
>>> idea what the effort would be to get it to build again for qt 4.7?
> 
>> I'm not sure. To make it easy I just disabled the not important parts
>> where compiling errors occured. But I will have a look into it.
> 
> Thanks, I think it's safe to add the recipes as they are and work on
> these things after they are added.

Thanks for adding it Koen.
It seems the two patches for demos/browser and demos/affine are no
longer necessary. I will create a patch to remove it tomorrow. Sorry for
the inconvenient with that.

Regards,
Matthias