From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack()
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:36:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115033657.GA407@tigerII.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191113103922.3dc3e8e9@gandalf.local.home>
On (19/11/13 10:39), Steven Rostedt wrote:
[..]
> > void show_stack(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *sp, int log_level)
> > {
> > printk_emergency_enter(log_level);
> > __show_stack(task, sp);
> > printk_emergency_exit();
> > }
> > // - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - //
> >
> > show_stack() never schedules, disabling preemption around it should
> > not change anything. Should it be interrupted, we will handle it via
> > preempt count.
>
> Please no! The whole point of the printk rewrite was to allow for
> printk to be preemptible and used in more contexts. The show_stack() can
> be all over the place and is not a fast function. Let's not disable
> preemption for it.
I never said that this code should be used all over the place. What
I did say several times was that this code is for quick debugging,
when one sits behind a slow serial console and wants to tweak loglevel
of all printk-s of a particular context/function only.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 3:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-06 3:04 [OpenRISC] [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack() Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-06 3:05 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 24/50] openrisc: Add show_stack_loglvl() Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-06 8:35 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 00/50] Add log level to show_stack() Petr Mladek
2019-11-06 16:12 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-08 10:37 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-08 13:04 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-11 1:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-11 9:12 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-12 4:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-12 4:57 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-12 8:35 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-12 10:12 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 1:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 2:25 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-13 6:33 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 8:47 ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-13 16:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-13 16:40 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-15 0:50 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 15:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-11 19:47 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-12 2:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-12 2:40 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-12 4:25 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 2:41 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-13 2:51 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-13 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-15 3:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2019-11-06 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 16:27 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-06 20:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 23:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-13 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-11-08 16:28 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-08 17:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-11-08 21:08 ` Dmitry Safonov
2019-11-13 15:41 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191115033657.GA407@tigerII.localdomain \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox