[OpenRISC] [PATCH 04/15] arm64: numa: simplify dummy_numa_init()

[Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>]

From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>

dummy_numa_init() loops over memblock.memory and passes nid=0 to
numa_add_memblk() which essentially wraps memblock_set_node(). However,
memblock_set_node() can cope with entire memory span itself, so the loop
over memblock.memory regions is redundant.

Replace the loop with a single call to memblock_set_node() to the entire
memory.

Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
index aafcee3e3f7e..0cbdbcc885fb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/numa.c
@@ -423,19 +423,16 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
  */
 static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
 {
+	phys_addr_t start = memblock_start_of_DRAM();
+	phys_addr_t end = memblock_end_of_DRAM();
 	int ret;
-	struct memblock_region *mblk;
 
 	if (numa_off)
 		pr_info("NUMA disabled\n"); /* Forced off on command line. */
-	pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n",
-		memblock_start_of_DRAM(), memblock_end_of_DRAM() - 1);
-
-	for_each_memblock(memory, mblk) {
-		ret = numa_add_memblk(0, mblk->base, mblk->base + mblk->size);
-		if (!ret)
-			continue;
+	pr_info("Faking a node at [mem %#018Lx-%#018Lx]\n", start, end - 1);
 
+	ret = numa_add_memblk(0, start, end);
+	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("NUMA init failed\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.26.2