From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: opensbi@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] lib: sbi: fwft: add support for SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:50:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240621-40c8b1acabcbc3e306e855e8@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240619094244.603628-3-cleger@rivosinc.com>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 11:42:40AM GMT, Cl?ment L?ger wrote:
> Add support for SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG withing FWFT support. This
> support allows to delegate misaligned accesses traps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cl?ment L?ger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
> ---
> lib/sbi/sbi_fwft.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_fwft.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_fwft.c
> index b302b5d..289a344 100644
> --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_fwft.c
> +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_fwft.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ static unsigned long fwft_ptr_offset;
> #define fwft_set_hart_state_ptr(__scratch, __phs) \
> sbi_scratch_write_type((__scratch), void *, fwft_ptr_offset, (__phs))
>
> +#define MIS_DELEG (1UL << CAUSE_MISALIGNED_LOAD | 1UL << CAUSE_MISALIGNED_STORE)
> +
> struct fwft_config;
>
> struct fwft_feature {
> @@ -71,6 +73,33 @@ static bool fwft_is_defined_feature(enum sbi_fwft_feature_t feature)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static int fwft_misaligned_delegation_supported(struct fwft_config *conf)
> +{
> + if (!misa_extension('S'))
> + return SBI_ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + return SBI_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int fwft_set_misaligned_delegation(struct fwft_config *conf,
> + unsigned long value)
> +{
> + if (value)
> + csr_set(CSR_MEDELEG, MIS_DELEG);
> + else
> + csr_clear(CSR_MEDELEG, MIS_DELEG);
Sorry for my late review. This should be
if (value == 1)
csr_set(CSR_MEDELEG, MIS_DELEG);
else if (value == 0)
csr_clear(CSR_MEDELEG, MIS_DELEG);
else
return SBI_EINVAL;
It's unlikely we'll ever extend the inputs/behaviors, but if we don't
check for the inputs explicitly now, then we never can.
And same comment for SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING.
Thanks,
drew
> +
> + return SBI_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static int fwft_get_misaligned_delegation(struct fwft_config *conf,
> + unsigned long *value)
> +{
> + *value = (csr_read(CSR_MEDELEG) & MIS_DELEG) != 0;
> +
> + return SBI_OK;
> +}
> +
> static struct fwft_config* get_feature_config(enum sbi_fwft_feature_t feature)
> {
> int i;
> @@ -148,7 +177,15 @@ int sbi_fwft_get(enum sbi_fwft_feature_t feature, unsigned long *out_val)
> return conf->feature->get(conf, out_val);
> }
>
> -static const struct fwft_feature features[] = {};
> +static const struct fwft_feature features[] =
> +{
> + {
> + .id = SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG,
> + .supported = fwft_misaligned_delegation_supported,
> + .set = fwft_set_misaligned_delegation,
> + .get = fwft_get_misaligned_delegation,
> + },
> +};
>
> int sbi_fwft_init(struct sbi_scratch *scratch, bool cold_boot)
> {
> diff --git a/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c b/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
> index be48d64..2b23e13 100644
> --- a/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
> +++ b/lib/sbi/sbi_hsm.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct sbi_hsm_data {
> unsigned long suspend_type;
> unsigned long saved_mie;
> unsigned long saved_mip;
> + unsigned long saved_medeleg;
> atomic_t start_ticket;
> };
>
> @@ -417,6 +418,7 @@ void __sbi_hsm_suspend_non_ret_save(struct sbi_scratch *scratch)
>
> hdata->saved_mie = csr_read(CSR_MIE);
> hdata->saved_mip = csr_read(CSR_MIP) & (MIP_SSIP | MIP_STIP);
> + hdata->saved_medeleg = csr_read(CSR_MEDELEG);
> }
>
> static void __sbi_hsm_suspend_non_ret_restore(struct sbi_scratch *scratch)
> @@ -424,6 +426,7 @@ static void __sbi_hsm_suspend_non_ret_restore(struct sbi_scratch *scratch)
> struct sbi_hsm_data *hdata = sbi_scratch_offset_ptr(scratch,
> hart_data_offset);
>
> + csr_write(CSR_MEDELEG, hdata->saved_medeleg);
> csr_write(CSR_MIE, hdata->saved_mie);
> csr_set(CSR_MIP, (hdata->saved_mip & (MIP_SSIP | MIP_STIP)));
> }
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
> --
> opensbi mailing list
> opensbi at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/opensbi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-21 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 9:42 [PATCH v3 0/4] Add SBI FWFT extension support Clément Léger
2024-06-19 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] lib: sbi: add support for firmware features extension Clément Léger
2024-06-19 12:47 ` Anup Patel
2024-06-19 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] lib: sbi: fwft: add support for SBI_FWFT_MISALIGNED_EXC_DELEG Clément Léger
2024-06-19 12:48 ` Anup Patel
2024-06-21 13:50 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-06-24 8:28 ` Clément Léger
2024-06-19 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] lib: sbi: fwft: add support for SBI_FWFT_PTE_AD_HW_UPDATING Clément Léger
2024-06-19 12:48 ` Anup Patel
2024-06-19 9:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] lib: sbi: implement SBI FWFT extension Clément Léger
2024-06-19 12:49 ` Anup Patel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240621-40c8b1acabcbc3e306e855e8@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=opensbi@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox