* [PATCH 0/1] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix build without CONFIG_SUSPEND
@ 2025-05-23 13:14 Luke Jones
2025-05-23 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Luke Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luke Jones @ 2025-05-23 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: hdegoede, ilpo.jarvinen, platform-driver-x86, mario.limonciello,
andriy.shevchenko, Luke Jones
Fixes "platform/x86: asus-wmi: Refactor Ally suspend/resume".
Verified using the following details provided by test robot:
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git review-ilpo-next
head: 83579675331059689e2869bf752ca9e17fadbd82
commit: feea7bd6b02d43a794e3f065650d89cf8d8e8e59 [74/89] platform/x86: asus-wmi: Refactor Ally suspend/resume
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20250509 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250509/202505090418.DaeaXe4i-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.2 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 58df0ef89dd64126512e4ee27b4ac3fd8ddf6247)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250509/202505090418.DaeaXe4i-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
I've not done anything fancy here and left asus_hotk_prepare() as is, as it is *incredibly* unlikely anyone would ever run a ROG Ally without suspend enabled.
Luke Jones (1):
platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix build without CONFIG_SUSPEND
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix build without CONFIG_SUSPEND
2025-05-23 13:14 [PATCH 0/1] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix build without CONFIG_SUSPEND Luke Jones
@ 2025-05-23 13:14 ` Luke Jones
2025-05-23 13:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luke Jones @ 2025-05-23 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: hdegoede, ilpo.jarvinen, platform-driver-x86, mario.limonciello,
andriy.shevchenko, Luke Jones, kernel test robot
The patch "Refactor Ally suspend/resume" introduced an
acpi_s2idle_dev_ops for use with ROG Ally which caused a build error
if CONFIG_SUSPEND was not defined.
Signed-off-by: Luke Jones <luke@ljones.dev>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505090418.DaeaXe4i-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: feea7bd6b02d ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: Refactor Ally suspend/resume")
---
drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
index 27f11643a00d..087318e0d595 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
@@ -5005,6 +5005,7 @@ static int asus_hotk_restore(struct device *device)
return 0;
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
static void asus_ally_s2idle_restore(void)
{
if (use_ally_mcu_hack == ASUS_WMI_ALLY_MCU_HACK_ENABLED) {
@@ -5013,6 +5014,7 @@ static void asus_ally_s2idle_restore(void)
msleep(ASUS_USB0_PWR_EC0_CSEE_WAIT);
}
}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
static int asus_hotk_prepare(struct device *device)
{
@@ -5025,9 +5027,11 @@ static int asus_hotk_prepare(struct device *device)
}
/* Use only for Ally devices due to the wake_on_ac */
+#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops = {
.restore = asus_ally_s2idle_restore,
};
+#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
static const struct dev_pm_ops asus_pm_ops = {
.thaw = asus_hotk_thaw,
@@ -5060,9 +5064,11 @@ static int asus_wmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return ret;
}
+ #if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
ret = acpi_register_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops);
if (ret)
pr_warn("failed to register LPS0 sleep handler in asus-wmi\n");
+ #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
return asus_wmi_add(pdev);
}
@@ -5096,7 +5102,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(asus_wmi_register_driver);
void asus_wmi_unregister_driver(struct asus_wmi_driver *driver)
{
+ #if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops);
+ #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
+
platform_device_unregister(driver->platform_device);
platform_driver_unregister(&driver->platform_driver);
used = false;
--
2.49.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix build without CONFIG_SUSPEND
2025-05-23 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Luke Jones
@ 2025-05-23 13:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-23 18:44 ` Luke Jones
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2025-05-23 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luke Jones
Cc: LKML, Hans de Goede, platform-driver-x86, mario.limonciello,
Andy Shevchenko, kernel test robot
On Fri, 23 May 2025, Luke Jones wrote:
> The patch "Refactor Ally suspend/resume" introduced an
The commit feea7bd6b02d ("...")
> acpi_s2idle_dev_ops for use with ROG Ally which caused a build error
> if CONFIG_SUSPEND was not defined.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luke Jones <luke@ljones.dev>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505090418.DaeaXe4i-lkp@intel.com/
> Fixes: feea7bd6b02d ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: Refactor Ally suspend/resume")
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> index 27f11643a00d..087318e0d595 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> @@ -5005,6 +5005,7 @@ static int asus_hotk_restore(struct device *device)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> static void asus_ally_s2idle_restore(void)
> {
> if (use_ally_mcu_hack == ASUS_WMI_ALLY_MCU_HACK_ENABLED) {
> @@ -5013,6 +5014,7 @@ static void asus_ally_s2idle_restore(void)
> msleep(ASUS_USB0_PWR_EC0_CSEE_WAIT);
> }
> }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
Move this function below asus_hotk_prepare() next to ops, so that only one
#if block is needed for them.
>
> static int asus_hotk_prepare(struct device *device)
> {
> @@ -5025,9 +5027,11 @@ static int asus_hotk_prepare(struct device *device)
> }
>
> /* Use only for Ally devices due to the wake_on_ac */
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops = {
> .restore = asus_ally_s2idle_restore,
> };
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
>
> static const struct dev_pm_ops asus_pm_ops = {
> .thaw = asus_hotk_thaw,
> @@ -5060,9 +5064,11 @@ static int asus_wmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + #if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> ret = acpi_register_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops);
> if (ret)
> pr_warn("failed to register LPS0 sleep handler in asus-wmi\n");
> + #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
>
> return asus_wmi_add(pdev);
> }
> @@ -5096,7 +5102,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(asus_wmi_register_driver);
>
> void asus_wmi_unregister_driver(struct asus_wmi_driver *driver)
> {
> + #if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops);
> + #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
I'd have preferred these reg/unreg be solved with wrappers (see
pmc_atom.c).
--
i.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix build without CONFIG_SUSPEND
2025-05-23 13:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
@ 2025-05-23 18:44 ` Luke Jones
2025-05-25 20:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Luke Jones @ 2025-05-23 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ilpo Järvinen
Cc: LKML, Hans de Goede, platform-driver-x86, Mario Limonciello,
Andy Shevchenko, kernel test robot
On Fri, 23 May 2025, at 3:25 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2025, Luke Jones wrote:
>
>> The patch "Refactor Ally suspend/resume" introduced an
>
> The commit feea7bd6b02d ("...")
>
>> acpi_s2idle_dev_ops for use with ROG Ally which caused a build error
>> if CONFIG_SUSPEND was not defined.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luke Jones <luke@ljones.dev>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505090418.DaeaXe4i-lkp@intel.com/
>> Fixes: feea7bd6b02d ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: Refactor Ally suspend/resume")
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>> index 27f11643a00d..087318e0d595 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
>> @@ -5005,6 +5005,7 @@ static int asus_hotk_restore(struct device *device)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
>> static void asus_ally_s2idle_restore(void)
>> {
>> if (use_ally_mcu_hack == ASUS_WMI_ALLY_MCU_HACK_ENABLED) {
>> @@ -5013,6 +5014,7 @@ static void asus_ally_s2idle_restore(void)
>> msleep(ASUS_USB0_PWR_EC0_CSEE_WAIT);
>> }
>> }
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
>
> Move this function below asus_hotk_prepare() next to ops, so that only one
> #if block is needed for them.
>
Done
>>
>> static int asus_hotk_prepare(struct device *device)
>> {
>> @@ -5025,9 +5027,11 @@ static int asus_hotk_prepare(struct device *device)
>> }
>>
>> /* Use only for Ally devices due to the wake_on_ac */
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
>> static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops = {
>> .restore = asus_ally_s2idle_restore,
>> };
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
>>
>> static const struct dev_pm_ops asus_pm_ops = {
>> .thaw = asus_hotk_thaw,
>> @@ -5060,9 +5064,11 @@ static int asus_wmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> + #if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
>> ret = acpi_register_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops);
>> if (ret)
>> pr_warn("failed to register LPS0 sleep handler in asus-wmi\n");
>> + #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
>>
>> return asus_wmi_add(pdev);
>> }
>> @@ -5096,7 +5102,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(asus_wmi_register_driver);
>>
>> void asus_wmi_unregister_driver(struct asus_wmi_driver *driver)
>> {
>> + #if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
>> acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops);
>> + #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
>
> I'd have preferred these reg/unreg be solved with wrappers (see
> pmc_atom.c).
Can do, but I don't really understand the difference it makes in this context. Should I log that CONFIG_SUSPEND was not enabled? Otherwise it's just as good as not there, right?
>
>
> --
> i.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix build without CONFIG_SUSPEND
2025-05-23 18:44 ` Luke Jones
@ 2025-05-25 20:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2025-05-25 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Luke Jones
Cc: LKML, Hans de Goede, platform-driver-x86, Mario Limonciello,
Andy Shevchenko, kernel test robot
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3322 bytes --]
On Fri, 23 May 2025, Luke Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 23 May 2025, at 3:25 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 May 2025, Luke Jones wrote:
> >
> >> The patch "Refactor Ally suspend/resume" introduced an
> >
> > The commit feea7bd6b02d ("...")
> >
> >> acpi_s2idle_dev_ops for use with ROG Ally which caused a build error
> >> if CONFIG_SUSPEND was not defined.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luke Jones <luke@ljones.dev>
> >> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505090418.DaeaXe4i-lkp@intel.com/
> >> Fixes: feea7bd6b02d ("platform/x86: asus-wmi: Refactor Ally suspend/resume")
> >> ---
> >> drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c | 9 +++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> >> index 27f11643a00d..087318e0d595 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/asus-wmi.c
> >> @@ -5005,6 +5005,7 @@ static int asus_hotk_restore(struct device *device)
> >> return 0;
> >> }
> >>
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> >> static void asus_ally_s2idle_restore(void)
> >> {
> >> if (use_ally_mcu_hack == ASUS_WMI_ALLY_MCU_HACK_ENABLED) {
> >> @@ -5013,6 +5014,7 @@ static void asus_ally_s2idle_restore(void)
> >> msleep(ASUS_USB0_PWR_EC0_CSEE_WAIT);
> >> }
> >> }
> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
> >
> > Move this function below asus_hotk_prepare() next to ops, so that only one
> > #if block is needed for them.
> >
>
> Done
>
> >>
> >> static int asus_hotk_prepare(struct device *device)
> >> {
> >> @@ -5025,9 +5027,11 @@ static int asus_hotk_prepare(struct device *device)
> >> }
> >>
> >> /* Use only for Ally devices due to the wake_on_ac */
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> >> static struct acpi_s2idle_dev_ops asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops = {
> >> .restore = asus_ally_s2idle_restore,
> >> };
> >> +#endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
> >>
> >> static const struct dev_pm_ops asus_pm_ops = {
> >> .thaw = asus_hotk_thaw,
> >> @@ -5060,9 +5064,11 @@ static int asus_wmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + #if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> >> ret = acpi_register_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops);
> >> if (ret)
> >> pr_warn("failed to register LPS0 sleep handler in asus-wmi\n");
> >> + #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
> >>
> >> return asus_wmi_add(pdev);
> >> }
> >> @@ -5096,7 +5102,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(asus_wmi_register_driver);
> >>
> >> void asus_wmi_unregister_driver(struct asus_wmi_driver *driver)
> >> {
> >> + #if defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> >> acpi_unregister_lps0_dev(&asus_ally_s2idle_dev_ops);
> >> + #endif /* CONFIG_SUSPEND */
> >
> > I'd have preferred these reg/unreg be solved with wrappers (see
> > pmc_atom.c).
>
> Can do, but I don't really understand the difference it makes in this context. Should I log that CONFIG_SUSPEND was not enabled? Otherwise it's just as good as not there, right?
I just want to limit the use of ifdeffery to minimum and prefer using
#else + a stub over sprinkling ifdefs all over the place. And it's
orthogonal whether the CONFIG_SUSPEND=n should print a warning or not.
I'll take the v3.
--
i.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-25 20:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-05-23 13:14 [PATCH 0/1] platform/x86: asus-wmi: fix build without CONFIG_SUSPEND Luke Jones
2025-05-23 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Luke Jones
2025-05-23 13:25 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2025-05-23 18:44 ` Luke Jones
2025-05-25 20:52 ` Ilpo Järvinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox