From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] intel_scu_ipc: move ipclock to struct intel_scu_ipc_dev
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 18:21:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444404097.8361.551.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1444399896-78599-5-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 17:11 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> No need to use global variable for a mutex. Move it to be a member of
> SCU IPC
> device structure.
This one is wrong, sorry.
>
> While here, protect dev member assignment in ->remove() since user
> may
> potentially call unbind from sysfs even if driver is built-in.
This part is still right.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> --------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
> index 9de2029..16f1621 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_scu_ipc.c
> @@ -92,11 +92,13 @@ static struct intel_scu_ipc_pdata_t
> intel_scu_ipc_tangier_pdata = {
> .irq_mode = 0,
> };
>
> +/* @lock: lock used to prevent multiple call to SCU */
> struct intel_scu_ipc_dev {
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *ipc_base;
> void __iomem *i2c_base;
> struct completion cmd_complete;
> + struct mutex lock;
> u8 irq_mode;
> };
>
> @@ -112,8 +114,6 @@ static struct intel_scu_ipc_dev ipcdev; /* Only
> one for now */
> #define IPC_I2C_CNTRL_ADDR 0
> #define I2C_DATA_ADDR 0x04
>
> -static DEFINE_MUTEX(ipclock); /* lock used to prevent multiple call
> to SCU */
> -
> /*
> * Send ipc command
> * Command Register (Write Only):
> @@ -222,10 +222,10 @@ static int pwr_reg_rdwr(u16 *addr, u8 *data,
> u32 count, u32 op, u32 id)
>
> memset(cbuf, 0, sizeof(cbuf));
>
> - mutex_lock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_lock(&scu->lock);
>
> if (scu->dev == NULL) {
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static int pwr_reg_rdwr(u16 *addr, u8 *data, u32
> count, u32 op, u32 id)
> for (nc = 0; nc < count; nc++)
> data[nc] = ipc_data_readb(scu, nc);
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return err;
> }
>
> @@ -440,14 +440,14 @@ int intel_scu_ipc_simple_command(int cmd, int
> sub)
> struct intel_scu_ipc_dev *scu = &ipcdev;
> int err;
>
> - mutex_lock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_lock(&scu->lock);
> if (scu->dev == NULL) {
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> ipc_command(scu, sub << 12 | cmd);
> err = intel_scu_ipc_check_status(scu);
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return err;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(intel_scu_ipc_simple_command);
> @@ -470,9 +470,9 @@ int intel_scu_ipc_command(int cmd, int sub, u32
> *in, int inlen,
> struct intel_scu_ipc_dev *scu = &ipcdev;
> int i, err;
>
> - mutex_lock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_lock(&scu->lock);
> if (scu->dev == NULL) {
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ int intel_scu_ipc_command(int cmd, int sub, u32
> *in, int inlen,
> *out++ = ipc_data_readl(scu, 4 * i);
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return err;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(intel_scu_ipc_command);
> @@ -513,9 +513,9 @@ int intel_scu_ipc_i2c_cntrl(u32 addr, u32 *data)
> struct intel_scu_ipc_dev *scu = &ipcdev;
> u32 cmd = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_lock(&scu->lock);
> if (scu->dev == NULL) {
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> cmd = (addr >> 24) & 0xFF;
> @@ -532,10 +532,10 @@ int intel_scu_ipc_i2c_cntrl(u32 addr, u32
> *data)
> dev_err(scu->dev,
> "intel_scu_ipc: I2C INVALID_CMD = 0x%x\n",
> cmd);
>
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return -EIO;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&ipclock);
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(intel_scu_ipc_i2c_cntrl);
> @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ static int ipc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
> struct pci_device_id *id)
> return err;
>
> init_completion(&scu->cmd_complete);
> + mutex_init(&scu->lock);
>
> err = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, pdev->irq, ioc, 0,
> "intel_scu_ipc",
> scu);
> @@ -625,7 +626,10 @@ static void ipc_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct intel_scu_ipc_dev *scu = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> + mutex_lock(&scu->lock);
> scu->dev = NULL;
> + mutex_unlock(&scu->lock);
> +
> iounmap(scu->i2c_base);
> intel_scu_devices_destroy();
> }
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-09 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-09 14:11 [PATCH 1/5] intel_scu_ipc: fix error path by turning to devm_* / pcim_* Andy Shevchenko
2015-10-09 14:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] intel_scu_ipc: propagate struct intel_scu_ipc_dev Andy Shevchenko
2015-10-09 14:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] intel_scu_ipc: convert to use struct device * Andy Shevchenko
2015-10-09 14:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] intel_scu_ipc: switch to use module_pci_driver() macro Andy Shevchenko
2015-10-11 4:39 ` Darren Hart
2015-10-09 14:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] intel_scu_ipc: move ipclock to struct intel_scu_ipc_dev Andy Shevchenko
2015-10-09 15:21 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2015-10-11 4:43 ` Darren Hart
2015-10-12 8:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2015-10-11 4:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] intel_scu_ipc: fix error path by turning to devm_* / pcim_* Darren Hart
2015-10-12 8:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1444404097.8361.551.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox