From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: "Limonciello, Mario" <Mario.Limonciello@dell.com>
Cc: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Barnabás Pőcze" <pobrn@protonmail.com>,
"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Keyboard regression by intel-vbtn
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:53:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200929165325.GW3956970@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR19MB2636FFC274423BB564A7532CFA320@DM6PR19MB2636.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:25:12PM +0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2020 7:54
> > On 9/29/20 2:27 PM, Limonciello, Mario wrote:
...
> > >> I'm afraid that the only answer which I have to these questions
> > >> is not helpful, but in my experience it is true: "firmware sucks".
> > >
> > > So FWIW there is a Dell 2-in-1 that has been conflated into this same issue.
> > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1822394
> >
> > That is what a somewhat old kernel (5.0.0) which I guess may
> > lack your fix to check the chassis-type.
> >
> > Interesting that this actually is a 2-in-1 though.
> >
> > Also interesting that according to the reporter this was
> > triggered by a BIOS update.
> >
> > If you by any chance can provide an acpidump with both the
> > 1.2.0 and 1.4.0 BIOS versions that would be very interesting.
>
> I requested on the Ubuntu bug for someone to provide these.
>
> > > Something that is confusing to me is that on the Windows side all these
> > > machines use the same Intel driver for this infrastructure no matter the
> > > OEM.
> > > So they can't possibly be putting in quirk specific stuff in the driver side
> > > can they?
> > >
> > > It has to make you wonder if some baseline assumptions made in the
> > > driver early on around tablet mode support are completely false.
> >
> > I'm not saying your wrong. If you can get Intel to provide
> > us with some documentation, or Windows driver source code
> > for this, then that would be great.
> >
> > AFAICT the Linux driver currently is entirely based on
> > reverse engineering.
>
> That's correct it was originally reverse engineered.
>
> Andy,
>
> As there is no publicly available documentation, could you see if it would it be
> possible to get someone internal to Intel to compare private documentation to the
> driver to see if something basic is missing or done wrong?
I'm afraid that's all was designed solely for Windows and all information is
not available to us in any form (basically somebody has to ask for WOS driver
sources, and funny that as a customer your has more power to get this than mere
in-house Linux engineer as me).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-29 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-29 8:48 Keyboard regression by intel-vbtn Takashi Iwai
2020-09-29 9:21 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-29 9:29 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-09-29 9:59 ` Barnabás Pőcze
2020-09-29 10:17 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-29 12:27 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-09-29 12:54 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-29 14:25 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-09-29 16:53 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-09-29 20:37 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-09-29 20:47 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-09-30 13:28 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-30 15:12 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-09-30 15:36 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-30 16:02 ` Limonciello, Mario
2020-09-29 14:19 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-30 13:21 ` Hans de Goede
2020-09-30 13:21 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200929165325.GW3956970@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Mario.Limonciello@dell.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pobrn@protonmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox