From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Dan Scally" <djrscally@gmail.com>,
"Alan Stern" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Hao Yao" <hao.yao@intel.com>,
"Bingbu Cao" <bingbu.cao@intel.com>, Duane <duanek@chorus.net>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 21:16:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z__z_G21Ro2jGDkP@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250416124037.90508-9-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:40:36PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> New Intel Meteor Lake based laptops with IPU6 cameras have a new type 0x12
> pin defined in the INT3472 sensor companion device which describes
> the sensor's GPIOs.
>
> This pin is primarily used on designs with a Lattice FPGA chip which is
> capable of running the sensor independently of the main CPU for features
> like presence detection. This pin needs to be driven high to make the FPGA
> run the power-on sequence of the sensor. After driving the pin high,
> the FPGA "firmware" needs 25ms to complete the power-on sequence.
>
> Add support for this modelling the handshake pin as a GPIO driven "dvdd"
> regulator with a 25 ms enable time. This model was chosen because:
>
> 1. Sensor chips don't have a handshake pin, so we need to abstract this
> in some way which does not require modification to the sensor drivers,
> sensor drivers using the bulk-regulator API to get avdd + vddio + dvdd
> is normal. So this will work to get the right value set to the handshake
> pin without requiring sensor driver modifications.
>
> 2. Sensors typically wait only a small time for the sensor to power-on
> after de-asserting reset. Not the 25ms the Lattice chip requires.
> Using the regulator framework's enable_time allows hiding the need for
> this delay from the sensor drivers.
...
> if (ret)
> err_msg = "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n";
>
> + break;
> + if (ret)
> + err_msg = "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n";
> +
> break;
As discussed this might be changed to have the same format string with supplied
name as a parameter.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 12:40 [PATCH v3 0/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add skl_int3472_register_clock() helper Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] platform/x86: int3472: Stop setting a supply-name for GPIO regulators Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] platform/x86: int3472: Drop unused gpio field from struct int3472_gpio_regulator Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] platform/x86: int3472: Rework AVDD second sensor quirk handling Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] platform/x86: int3472: Make regulator supply name configurable Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-17 9:52 ` Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] platform/x86: int3472: Avoid GPIO regulator spikes Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] platform/x86: int3472: Prepare for registering more than 1 GPIO regulator Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:16 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-04-17 10:56 ` Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] platform/x86: int3472: Debug log when remapping pins Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z__z_G21Ro2jGDkP@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=duanek@chorus.net \
--cc=hao.yao@intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox