From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Dan Scally" <djrscally@gmail.com>,
"Alan Stern" <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
"Hao Yao" <hao.yao@intel.com>,
"Bingbu Cao" <bingbu.cao@intel.com>, Duane <duanek@chorus.net>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:56:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b019b2c4-0c2e-4ba2-bfa3-83fab7fd415f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z__z_G21Ro2jGDkP@smile.fi.intel.com>
Hi Andy,
On 16-Apr-25 8:16 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 02:40:36PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> New Intel Meteor Lake based laptops with IPU6 cameras have a new type 0x12
>> pin defined in the INT3472 sensor companion device which describes
>> the sensor's GPIOs.
>>
>> This pin is primarily used on designs with a Lattice FPGA chip which is
>> capable of running the sensor independently of the main CPU for features
>> like presence detection. This pin needs to be driven high to make the FPGA
>> run the power-on sequence of the sensor. After driving the pin high,
>> the FPGA "firmware" needs 25ms to complete the power-on sequence.
>>
>> Add support for this modelling the handshake pin as a GPIO driven "dvdd"
>> regulator with a 25 ms enable time. This model was chosen because:
>>
>> 1. Sensor chips don't have a handshake pin, so we need to abstract this
>> in some way which does not require modification to the sensor drivers,
>> sensor drivers using the bulk-regulator API to get avdd + vddio + dvdd
>> is normal. So this will work to get the right value set to the handshake
>> pin without requiring sensor driver modifications.
>>
>> 2. Sensors typically wait only a small time for the sensor to power-on
>> after de-asserting reset. Not the 25ms the Lattice chip requires.
>> Using the regulator framework's enable_time allows hiding the need for
>> this delay from the sensor drivers.
>
> ...
>
>> if (ret)
>> err_msg = "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n";
>>
>> + break;
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + err_msg = "Failed to map regulator to sensor\n";
>> +
>> break;
>
> As discussed this might be changed to have the same format string with supplied
> name as a parameter.
That does not work well, since this just stores a string to pass to
dev_err_probe() later.
So instead I've just gone with 2 unique errors for v4.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Thank you.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-17 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 12:40 [PATCH v3 0/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add skl_int3472_register_clock() helper Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] platform/x86: int3472: Stop setting a supply-name for GPIO regulators Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] platform/x86: int3472: Drop unused gpio field from struct int3472_gpio_regulator Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] platform/x86: int3472: Rework AVDD second sensor quirk handling Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] platform/x86: int3472: Make regulator supply name configurable Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-17 9:52 ` Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] platform/x86: int3472: Avoid GPIO regulator spikes Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] platform/x86: int3472: Prepare for registering more than 1 GPIO regulator Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] platform/x86: int3472: Add handshake pin support Hans de Goede
2025-04-16 18:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-04-17 10:56 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2025-04-16 12:40 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] platform/x86: int3472: Debug log when remapping pins Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b019b2c4-0c2e-4ba2-bfa3-83fab7fd415f@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=duanek@chorus.net \
--cc=hao.yao@intel.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox