X86 platform drivers
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Shinichiro Kawasaki" <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>,
	"platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org"
	<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"danilrybakov249@gmail.com" <danilrybakov249@gmail.com>,
	"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
	"Klara Modin" <klarasmodin@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: p2sb: Defer P2SB device scan when P2SB device has func 0
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 15:39:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6f4dc89-935b-4030-828e-95b2dba54602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZeXcJfXnhkPQ6M8J@smile.fi.intel.com>

Hi,

On 3/4/24 3:35 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:24:58PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 3/4/24 3:17 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 04:09:49PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 02:59:57PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>> On 3/4/24 1:13 PM, Shinichiro Kawasaki wrote:
>>>>>> On Mar 04, 2024 / 12:04, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>>> Thanks for sharing the insights.
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking closer at the actual unhiding I don't think accessing func 0
>>>>> is the problem. The unhiding is always done on function 0 even when
>>>>> retreiving the bar for function 2 (the SPI function).
>>>>>
>>>>> So taking that into account, as mentioned in the bugzilla, I think
>>>>> the problem is probing the other functions (1, 3-7) by calling
>>>>> pci_scan_single_device() on them.
>>>>
>>>> So, why we can't simply call pci_dev_present() on the function in a loop?
>>>
>>> pci_device_is_present()
>>
>> That takes a pci_dev as argument which we only have after calling
>> pci_scan_single_device() and the calling of pci_scan_single_device()
>> on some of the other functions is what is suspected of maybe causing
>> the issue.
>>
>> Also it is likely that if pci_scan_single_device() is actually
>> a problem that then what is a problem is running it on an actual
>> present device.
> 
> Which is weird. But okay, let's work around first the real issue, then
> if I have time I will look into datasheet to see if there is anything
> special about P2SB device(s).

Note atm pci_scan_single_device() on one of the "other" being
the problem is still only a theory!

It is also possible that pci_scan_single_device() on the P2SB
itself is somehow an issue on this laptop, since on this laptop
p2sb_bar() is only called for the SPI controller, so before
the caching to avoid the deadlock issue pci_scan_single_device()
was not called on the P2SB devfn itself.

Regards,

Hans


      reply	other threads:[~2024-03-04 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-02  1:28 [PATCH v2] platform/x86: p2sb: Defer P2SB device scan when P2SB device has func 0 Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
2024-03-02  7:28 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-03-02 11:43   ` Hans de Goede
2024-03-02 23:37     ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-03-03 19:35       ` Hans de Goede
2024-03-04  3:19         ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-03-04  9:55           ` Hans de Goede
2024-03-04 11:04             ` Hans de Goede
2024-03-04 12:13               ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2024-03-04 13:59                 ` Hans de Goede
2024-03-04 14:09                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-04 14:16                     ` Hans de Goede
2024-03-04 14:17                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-04 14:20                       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-04 14:24                       ` Hans de Goede
2024-03-04 14:35                         ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-03-04 14:39                           ` Hans de Goede [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6f4dc89-935b-4030-828e-95b2dba54602@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=danilrybakov249@gmail.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=klarasmodin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox