From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] net: rtnetlink: Fix incorrect RCU API usage
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 08:40:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190220164034.GM11787@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190220040827.136184-2-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:08:23PM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>
> rtnl_register_internal() and rtnl_unregister_all tries to directly
> dereference an RCU protected pointed outside RCU read side section.
> While this is Ok to do since a lock is held, let us use the correct
> API to avoid programmer bugs in the future.
>
> This also fixes sparse warnings arising from not using RCU API.
>
> net/core/rtnetlink.c:332:13: warning: incorrect type in assignment
> (different address spaces) net/core/rtnetlink.c:332:13: expected
> struct rtnl_link **tab net/core/rtnetlink.c:332:13: got struct
> rtnl_link *[noderef] <asn:4>*<noident>
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
First, thank you for doing this!
I was going to complain that these were update-side accesses, but it
looks like rtnl_dereference() already handles both readers and updaters.
So looks good to me, but the maintainers of course have the final word.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index 5ea1bed08ede..98be4b4818a9 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int rtnl_register_internal(struct module *owner,
> msgindex = rtm_msgindex(msgtype);
>
> rtnl_lock();
> - tab = rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol];
> + tab = rtnl_dereference(rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol]);
> if (tab == NULL) {
> tab = kcalloc(RTM_NR_MSGTYPES, sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tab)
> @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ void rtnl_unregister_all(int protocol)
> BUG_ON(protocol < 0 || protocol > RTNL_FAMILY_MAX);
>
> rtnl_lock();
> - tab = rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol];
> + tab = rtnl_dereference(rtnl_msg_handlers[protocol]);
> if (!tab) {
> rtnl_unlock();
> return;
> --
> 2.21.0.rc0.258.g878e2cd30e-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-20 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-20 4:08 [RFC 0/5] RCU fixes for rcu_assign_pointer usage Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-02-20 4:08 ` [RFC 1/5] net: rtnetlink: Fix incorrect RCU API usage Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-02-20 16:40 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-02-20 18:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-02-20 4:08 ` [RFC 2/5] ixgbe: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-02-20 4:08 ` [RFC 3/5] sched/cpufreq: " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-02-20 4:08 ` [RFC 4/5] sched/toplogy: Use smp_store_release() instead of rcu_assign_pointer Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-02-20 4:08 ` [RFC 5/5] rcuwait: Replace rcu_assign_pointer with smp_store_release Joel Fernandes (Google)
2019-02-20 4:11 ` [RFC 0/5] RCU fixes for rcu_assign_pointer usage Joel Fernandes
2019-02-20 16:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-20 18:09 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-02-20 18:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-02-21 16:50 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190220164034.GM11787@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox