Linux RCU subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 3/3] rcu: coordinate tick dependency during concurrent offlining
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 13:58:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220915055825.21525-4-kernelfans@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220915055825.21525-1-kernelfans@gmail.com>

As Paul pointed out  "The tick_dep_clear() is SMP-safe because it uses
atomic operations, but the problem is that if there are multiple
nohz_full CPUs going offline concurrently, the first CPU to invoke
rcutree_dead_cpu() will turn the tick off.  This might require an
atomically manipulated counter to mediate the calls to
rcutree_dead_cpu(). "

This patch introduces a new member ->dying to rcu_node, which reflects
the number of concurrent offlining cpu. TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU is set by
the first entrance and cleared by the last.

Note: now, tick_dep_set() is put under the rnp->lock, but since it takes
no lock, no extra locking order is introduced.

Suggested-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/rcu/tree.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 8a829b64f5b2..f8bd0fc5fd2f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2164,13 +2164,19 @@ int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;  /* Outgoing CPU's rdp & rnp. */
+	unsigned long flags;
+	u8 dying;
 
 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU))
 		return 0;
 
 	WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus, rcu_state.n_online_cpus - 1);
-	// Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
-	tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+	dying = --rnp->dying;
+	if (!dying)
+		// Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
+		tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -4020,17 +4026,20 @@ int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct rcu_data *rdp;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
+	u8 dying;
 
 	rdp = per_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data, cpu);
 	rnp = rdp->mynode;
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 	rnp->ffmask &= ~rdp->grpmask;
+	/* Let rcutree_dead_cpu() know a new offlining. */
+	dying = rnp->dying++;
+	if (!dying)
+		// nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly
+		tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
 
 	rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, cpu);
-
-	// nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly
-	tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index d4a97e40ea9c..b508a12ac953 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -81,6 +81,7 @@ struct rcu_node {
 	int	grphi;		/* highest-numbered CPU here. */
 	u8	grpnum;		/* group number for next level up. */
 	u8	level;		/* root is at level 0. */
+	u8	dying;		/* num of concurrent rdp offlining */
 	bool	wait_blkd_tasks;/* Necessary to wait for blocked tasks to */
 				/*  exit RCU read-side critical sections */
 				/*  before propagating offline up the */
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-15  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-15  5:58 [PATCHv2 0/3] rcu: Enhance the capability to cope with concurrent cpu offlining/onlining Pingfan Liu
2022-09-15  5:58 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] rcu: Keep qsmaskinitnext fresh when rcutree_online_cpu() Pingfan Liu
2022-09-15  6:11   ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-16 14:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-19 10:24     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-19 10:51       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20  3:45         ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-20  9:23           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-01  2:26             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-02 12:34               ` Pingfan Liu
2022-10-02 15:52                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-20 10:31   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-21 11:56     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-15  5:58 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] rcu: Resort to cpu_dying_mask for affinity when offlining Pingfan Liu
2022-09-16 14:23   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-19  4:33     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-19 10:34       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20  3:16         ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-20  9:00           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20  9:38   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-21 11:48     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-15  5:58 ` Pingfan Liu [this message]
2022-09-16 13:42   ` [PATCHv2 3/3] rcu: coordinate tick dependency during concurrent offlining Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20  7:26     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-20  9:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20 19:13         ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-22  9:29           ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-22 13:54             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-23 22:13               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-26  6:34               ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-26 22:23                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-27  9:59                   ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-29  8:19                     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-29  8:20                       ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-30 13:04                         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-02 14:06                           ` Pingfan Liu
2022-10-02 16:11                             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-02 16:24                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 16:30                                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-02 16:57                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 16:59                                     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-30 15:44                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 13:29                         ` Pingfan Liu
2022-10-02 15:08                           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-02 16:20                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 16:20                           ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]                             ` <CAFgQCTtgLfc0NeYqyWk4Ew-pA9rMREjRjWSnQhYLv-V5117s9Q@mail.gmail.com>
2022-10-27 17:46                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-31  3:24                                 ` Pingfan Liu
2022-11-03 16:51                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-07 16:07                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-09 18:55                                       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-18 12:08                                         ` Pingfan Liu
2022-11-18 23:30                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-21  3:48                                             ` Pingfan Liu
2022-11-21 17:14                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-17 14:39                                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-18  1:45                                         ` Pingfan Liu
     [not found]                             ` <CAFgQCTtNetv7v_Law=abPtngC8Gv6OGcGz9M_wWMxz_GAEWDUQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-10-27 18:13                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-31  2:10                                 ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-26 16:13   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-27  9:42     ` Pingfan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220915055825.21525-4-kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --to=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox