Linux RCU subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] rcu: coordinate tick dependency during concurrent offlining
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 00:13:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220923221349.GA161211@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220922135442.GH4196@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>

On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 06:54:42AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 05:29:32PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > My understanding is after removing the tick dep by
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 79aea7df4345..cbfc884f04a4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -2171,8 +2171,6 @@ int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> >         WRITE_ONCE(rcu_state.n_online_cpus, rcu_state.n_online_cpus - 1);
> >         /* Adjust any no-longer-needed kthreads. */
> >         rcu_boost_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1);
> > -       // Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
> > -       tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -4008,8 +4006,6 @@ int rcutree_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> >         sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(cpu);
> >         rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, -1);
> > 
> > -       // Stop-machine done, so allow nohz_full to disable tick.
> > -       tick_dep_clear(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > @@ -4031,8 +4027,6 @@ int rcutree_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> > 
> >         rcutree_affinity_setting(cpu, cpu);
> > 
> > -       // nohz_full CPUs need the tick for stop-machine to work quickly
> > -       tick_dep_set(TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > 
> > If the TREE04 can success, then move on to revert the commit(s)
> > identified by Frederic, and do test again.
> > 
> > At this time, a TREE04 failure is expected.
> > 
> > If the above two results are observed, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU can be
> > removed.
> > 
> > Is my understanding right?
> 
> Seems plausible to me, but I again defer to Frederic.

Right, more precisely the commit to revert is:

     96926686deab ("rcu: Make CPU-hotplug removal operations enable tick")

which is the diff Pingfan Liu proposed above. The other uses of TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU
will still be needed though.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-23 22:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-15  5:58 [PATCHv2 0/3] rcu: Enhance the capability to cope with concurrent cpu offlining/onlining Pingfan Liu
2022-09-15  5:58 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] rcu: Keep qsmaskinitnext fresh when rcutree_online_cpu() Pingfan Liu
2022-09-15  6:11   ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-16 14:52   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-19 10:24     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-19 10:51       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20  3:45         ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-20  9:23           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-01  2:26             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-02 12:34               ` Pingfan Liu
2022-10-02 15:52                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-20 10:31   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-21 11:56     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-15  5:58 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] rcu: Resort to cpu_dying_mask for affinity when offlining Pingfan Liu
2022-09-16 14:23   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-19  4:33     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-19 10:34       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20  3:16         ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-20  9:00           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20  9:38   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-21 11:48     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-15  5:58 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] rcu: coordinate tick dependency during concurrent offlining Pingfan Liu
2022-09-16 13:42   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20  7:26     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-20  9:46       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-09-20 19:13         ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-22  9:29           ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-22 13:54             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-23 22:13               ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2022-09-26  6:34               ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-26 22:23                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-09-27  9:59                   ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-29  8:19                     ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-29  8:20                       ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-30 13:04                         ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-02 14:06                           ` Pingfan Liu
2022-10-02 16:11                             ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-02 16:24                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 16:30                                 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-02 16:57                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 16:59                                     ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-30 15:44                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 13:29                         ` Pingfan Liu
2022-10-02 15:08                           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-10-02 16:20                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-02 16:20                           ` Paul E. McKenney
     [not found]                             ` <CAFgQCTtgLfc0NeYqyWk4Ew-pA9rMREjRjWSnQhYLv-V5117s9Q@mail.gmail.com>
2022-10-27 17:46                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-31  3:24                                 ` Pingfan Liu
2022-11-03 16:51                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-07 16:07                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-09 18:55                                       ` Joel Fernandes
2022-11-18 12:08                                         ` Pingfan Liu
2022-11-18 23:30                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-21  3:48                                             ` Pingfan Liu
2022-11-21 17:14                                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-11-17 14:39                                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-11-18  1:45                                         ` Pingfan Liu
     [not found]                             ` <CAFgQCTtNetv7v_Law=abPtngC8Gv6OGcGz9M_wWMxz_GAEWDUQ@mail.gmail.com>
2022-10-27 18:13                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-10-31  2:10                                 ` Pingfan Liu
2022-09-26 16:13   ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-27  9:42     ` Pingfan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220923221349.GA161211@lothringen \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox