From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu v2 1/7] doc: Add broken-timing possibility to stallwarn.rst
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 10:49:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250130184925.1651665-1-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <851fd11f-6397-4411-983b-96f7234326d5@paulmck-laptop>
Currently, stallwarn.rst does not mention the fact that timer bugs can
result in false-positive RCU CPU stall warnings. This commit therefore
adds this to the list.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst
index 30080ff6f406..d1ccd6039a8c 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst
@@ -96,6 +96,13 @@ warnings:
the ``rcu_.*timer wakeup didn't happen for`` console-log message,
which will include additional debugging information.
+- A timer issue causes time to appear to jump forward, so that RCU
+ believes that the RCU CPU stall-warning timeout has been exceeded
+ when in fact much less time has passed. This could be due to
+ timer hardware bugs, timer driver bugs, or even corruption of
+ the "jiffies" global variable. These sorts of timer hardware
+ and driver bugs are not uncommon when testing new hardware.
+
- A low-level kernel issue that either fails to invoke one of the
variants of rcu_eqs_enter(true), rcu_eqs_exit(true), ct_idle_enter(),
ct_idle_exit(), ct_irq_enter(), or ct_irq_exit() on the one
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-30 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-16 20:02 [PATCH rcu 0/7] Documentation upates Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:02 ` [PATCH rcu 1/7] doc: Add broken-timing possibility to stallwarn.rst Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:02 ` [PATCH rcu 2/7] docs: Improve discussion of this_cpu_ptr(), add raw_cpu_ptr() Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 21:02 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-01-16 22:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:02 ` [PATCH rcu 3/7] rcu: Document self-propagating callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 21:38 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-16 20:02 ` [PATCH rcu 4/7] srcu: Point call_srcu() to call_rcu() for detailed memory ordering Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:02 ` [PATCH rcu 5/7] rcu: Add CONFIG_RCU_LAZY delays to call_rcu() kernel-doc header Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:02 ` [PATCH rcu 6/7] rcu: Clarify RCU_LAZY and RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF help text Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-16 20:02 ` [PATCH rcu 7/7] rcu: Remove references to old grace-period-wait primitives Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:47 ` [PATCH rcu 0/7] Documentation upates Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:49 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2025-01-30 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu v2 2/7] docs: Improve discussion of this_cpu_ptr(), add raw_cpu_ptr() Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu v2 3/7] rcu: Document self-propagating callbacks Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu v2 4/7] srcu: Point call_srcu() to call_rcu() for detailed memory ordering Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu v2 5/7] rcu: Add CONFIG_RCU_LAZY delays to call_rcu() kernel-doc header Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu v2 6/7] rcu: Clarify RCU_LAZY and RCU_LAZY_DEFAULT_OFF help text Paul E. McKenney
2025-01-30 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu v2 7/7] rcu: Remove references to old grace-period-wait primitives Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250130184925.1651665-1-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox