From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: lkmm@lists.linux.dev, joelagnelf@nvidia.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
paulmck@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org, sshegde@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org,
ulfh@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev, vineeth@bitbyteword.org,
yury.norov@gmail.com, rcu@vger.kernel.org, d@ilvokhin.com
Cc: shakeel.butt@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v3] smp: Use release stores for csd_lock_record() state
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2026 03:57:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260629105745.1696683-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
__csd_lock_record() publishes per-CPU diagnostic state (cur_csd,
cur_csd_func, cur_csd_info) that is consumed from a remote CPU by
csd_lock_wait_toolong() via smp_load_acquire(&cur_csd). To order the
matching cur_csd_func/cur_csd_info stores before the cur_csd
publication, the producer issues smp_wmb() before writing cur_csd;
to order the publication before the subsequent callback execution or
CSD unlock, it issues smp_mb() after the write. The clear path
mirrors this with smp_mb() before storing NULL into cur_csd so the
preceding callback/unlock is observed first.
The smp_mb() pair is heavier than what the consumer actually
requires (on x86 each emits a locked full barrier). The consumer
only needs to observe the matching cur_csd_func/cur_csd_info when it
sees a non-NULL cur_csd, and to observe the preceding callback/unlock
when it sees NULL -- both of which a release/acquire pair provides.
The extra two-way ordering enforced by smp_mb() -- that cur_csd
publication be observed before callback execution or unlock becomes
visible -- would only matter if cur_csd were an exact live-state
marker. csd_lock_wait_toolong() does not treat it that way: it
snapshots cur_csd via smp_load_acquire() and then prints / dumps /
re-IPIs without an RCU-style stall-ended recheck, so the diagnostic
already tolerates the remote CPU completing its work between snapshot
and report. cur_csd is best-effort context, not a precise stall
boundary.
Replace the smp_wmb() + plain store + smp_mb() in the publish path,
and the smp_mb() + plain store in the clear path, with
smp_store_release(). This pairs with the smp_load_acquire() in
csd_lock_wait_toolong(): preceding cur_csd_func/cur_csd_info stores
become visible before a remote reader observes the non-NULL
publication, and any preceding callback/unlock becomes visible before
a reader observes the NULL clear.
Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
---
v2 -> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260622163807.4187558-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/
- Restructure changelog into context/problem/solution form (Thomas
Gleixner).
- Add reciprocal pairing comment on the smp_load_acquire() in
csd_lock_wait_toolong() (Dmitry).
v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/01437928-ff79-4d8e-823b-7f20146946f6@linux.dev/
- Document where the smp_store_release() synchronizes with (Alan
Stern, Randy Dunlap and Paul McKenney).
---
kernel/smp.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index a0bb56bd8dda..8a847a34f132 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -182,16 +182,22 @@ static atomic_t csd_bug_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
static void __csd_lock_record(call_single_data_t *csd)
{
if (!csd) {
- smp_mb(); /* NULL cur_csd after unlock. */
- __this_cpu_write(cur_csd, NULL);
+ /*
+ * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() of cur_csd in
+ * csd_lock_wait_toolong(): orders any preceding CSD
+ * callback/unlock before a remote reader observes NULL.
+ */
+ smp_store_release(this_cpu_ptr(&cur_csd), NULL);
return;
}
__this_cpu_write(cur_csd_func, csd->func);
__this_cpu_write(cur_csd_info, csd->info);
- smp_wmb(); /* func and info before csd. */
- __this_cpu_write(cur_csd, csd);
- smp_mb(); /* Update cur_csd before function call. */
- /* Or before unlock, as the case may be. */
+ /*
+ * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() of cur_csd in
+ * csd_lock_wait_toolong(): publishes cur_csd_func and
+ * cur_csd_info before the non-NULL pointer becomes visible.
+ */
+ smp_store_release(this_cpu_ptr(&cur_csd), csd);
}
static __always_inline void csd_lock_record(call_single_data_t *csd)
@@ -272,7 +278,13 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
cpux = 0;
else
cpux = cpu;
- cpu_cur_csd = smp_load_acquire(&per_cpu(cur_csd, cpux)); /* Before func and info. */
+ /*
+ * Pairs with smp_store_release() of cur_csd in __csd_lock_record():
+ * a non-NULL cur_csd here implies cur_csd_func and cur_csd_info
+ * are the matching publication; a NULL value is ordered after any
+ * preceding CSD callback/unlock on the remote CPU.
+ */
+ cpu_cur_csd = smp_load_acquire(&per_cpu(cur_csd, cpux));
/* How long since this CSD lock was stuck. */
ts_delta = ts2 - ts0;
pr_alert("csd: %s non-responsive CSD lock (#%d) on CPU#%d, waiting %lld ns for CPU#%02d %pS(%ps).\n",
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-29 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-29 10:57 Usama Arif [this message]
2026-06-29 11:52 ` [PATCH v3] smp: Use release stores for csd_lock_record() state Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-29 15:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-29 16:42 ` Kunwu Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260629105745.1696683-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox