Linux RCU subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@linux.dev>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	lkmm@lists.linux.dev, joelagnelf@nvidia.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
	paulmck@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, sshegde@linux.ibm.com, tglx@kernel.org,
	ulfh@kernel.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org, d@ilvokhin.com
Cc: shakeel.butt@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] smp: Use release stores for csd_lock_record() state
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:42:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e3d91c52-7a3c-41eb-834b-a253d2900839@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260629105745.1696683-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>

On 6/29/26 18:57, Usama Arif wrote:
> __csd_lock_record() publishes per-CPU diagnostic state (cur_csd,
> cur_csd_func, cur_csd_info) that is consumed from a remote CPU by
> csd_lock_wait_toolong() via smp_load_acquire(&cur_csd). To order the
> matching cur_csd_func/cur_csd_info stores before the cur_csd
> publication, the producer issues smp_wmb() before writing cur_csd;
> to order the publication before the subsequent callback execution or
> CSD unlock, it issues smp_mb() after the write. The clear path
> mirrors this with smp_mb() before storing NULL into cur_csd so the
> preceding callback/unlock is observed first.
>
> The smp_mb() pair is heavier than what the consumer actually
> requires (on x86 each emits a locked full barrier). The consumer
> only needs to observe the matching cur_csd_func/cur_csd_info when it
> sees a non-NULL cur_csd, and to observe the preceding callback/unlock
> when it sees NULL -- both of which a release/acquire pair provides.
> The extra two-way ordering enforced by smp_mb() -- that cur_csd
> publication be observed before callback execution or unlock becomes
> visible -- would only matter if cur_csd were an exact live-state
> marker. csd_lock_wait_toolong() does not treat it that way: it
> snapshots cur_csd via smp_load_acquire() and then prints / dumps /
> re-IPIs without an RCU-style stall-ended recheck, so the diagnostic
> already tolerates the remote CPU completing its work between snapshot
> and report. cur_csd is best-effort context, not a precise stall
> boundary.
>
> Replace the smp_wmb() + plain store + smp_mb() in the publish path,
> and the smp_mb() + plain store in the clear path, with
> smp_store_release(). This pairs with the smp_load_acquire() in
> csd_lock_wait_toolong(): preceding cur_csd_func/cur_csd_info stores
> become visible before a remote reader observes the non-NULL
> publication, and any preceding callback/unlock becomes visible before
> a reader observes the NULL clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
> ---
> v2 -> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260622163807.4187558-1-usama.arif@linux.dev/
> - Restructure changelog into context/problem/solution form (Thomas
>   Gleixner).
> - Add reciprocal pairing comment on the smp_load_acquire() in
>   csd_lock_wait_toolong() (Dmitry).
>
> v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/01437928-ff79-4d8e-823b-7f20146946f6@linux.dev/
> - Document where the smp_store_release() synchronizes with (Alan
>   Stern, Randy Dunlap and Paul McKenney).
> ---
>  kernel/smp.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index a0bb56bd8dda..8a847a34f132 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -182,16 +182,22 @@ static atomic_t csd_bug_count = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
>  static void __csd_lock_record(call_single_data_t *csd)
>  {
>  	if (!csd) {
> -		smp_mb(); /* NULL cur_csd after unlock. */
> -		__this_cpu_write(cur_csd, NULL);
> +		/*
> +		 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() of cur_csd in
> +		 * csd_lock_wait_toolong(): orders any preceding CSD
> +		 * callback/unlock before a remote reader observes NULL.
> +		 */
> +		smp_store_release(this_cpu_ptr(&cur_csd), NULL);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  	__this_cpu_write(cur_csd_func, csd->func);
>  	__this_cpu_write(cur_csd_info, csd->info);
> -	smp_wmb(); /* func and info before csd. */
> -	__this_cpu_write(cur_csd, csd);
> -	smp_mb(); /* Update cur_csd before function call. */
> -		  /* Or before unlock, as the case may be. */
> +	/*
> +	 * Pairs with smp_load_acquire() of cur_csd in
> +	 * csd_lock_wait_toolong(): publishes cur_csd_func and
> +	 * cur_csd_info before the non-NULL pointer becomes visible.
> +	 */
> +	smp_store_release(this_cpu_ptr(&cur_csd), csd);
>  }
>  
>  static __always_inline void csd_lock_record(call_single_data_t *csd)
> @@ -272,7 +278,13 @@ static bool csd_lock_wait_toolong(call_single_data_t *csd, u64 ts0, u64 *ts1, in
>  		cpux = 0;
>  	else
>  		cpux = cpu;
> -	cpu_cur_csd = smp_load_acquire(&per_cpu(cur_csd, cpux)); /* Before func and info. */
> +	/*
> +	 * Pairs with smp_store_release() of cur_csd in __csd_lock_record():
> +	 * a non-NULL cur_csd here implies cur_csd_func and cur_csd_info
> +	 * are the matching publication; a NULL value is ordered after any
> +	 * preceding CSD callback/unlock on the remote CPU.
> +	 */
> +	cpu_cur_csd = smp_load_acquire(&per_cpu(cur_csd, cpux));
>  	/* How long since this CSD lock was stuck. */
>  	ts_delta = ts2 - ts0;
>  	pr_alert("csd: %s non-responsive CSD lock (#%d) on CPU#%d, waiting %lld ns for CPU#%02d %pS(%ps).\n",
Reviewed-by: Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@linux.dev>

-- 
Thanx, Kunwu


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-29 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-29 10:57 [PATCH v3] smp: Use release stores for csd_lock_record() state Usama Arif
2026-06-29 11:52 ` Dmitry Ilvokhin
2026-06-29 15:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-06-29 16:42 ` Kunwu Chan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e3d91c52-7a3c-41eb-834b-a253d2900839@linux.dev \
    --to=kunwu.chan@linux.dev \
    --cc=d@ilvokhin.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkmm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulfh@kernel.org \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox