[PATCH] rcu-tasks: Remove unused struct rcu_tasks's->n_ipis_fails variables

[PATCH] rcu-tasks: Remove unused struct rcu_tasks's->n_ipis_fails variables

[Zqiang]

The RCU tasks trace has been reimplemented by 'commit c27cea4416a3
("rcu: Re-implement RCU Tasks Trace in terms of SRCU-fast")', the
rcu_tasks structure's->n_ipis_fails is no longer used, this commit
therefore remove it.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index f4da5fad70f5..7f7d1e636217 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct rcu_tasks_percpu {
  * @gp_start: Most recent grace-period start in jiffies.
  * @tasks_gp_seq: Number of grace periods completed since boot in upper bits.
  * @n_ipis: Number of IPIs sent to encourage grace periods to end.
- * @n_ipis_fails: Number of IPI-send failures.
  * @kthread_ptr: This flavor's grace-period/callback-invocation kthread.
  * @lazy_jiffies: Number of jiffies to allow callbacks to be lazy.
  * @pregp_func: This flavor's pre-grace-period function (optional).
@@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
 	unsigned long gp_start;
 	unsigned long tasks_gp_seq;
 	unsigned long n_ipis;
-	unsigned long n_ipis_fails;
 	struct task_struct *kthread_ptr;
 	unsigned long lazy_jiffies;
 	rcu_tasks_gp_func_t gp_func;
@@ -735,12 +733,12 @@ static void show_rcu_tasks_generic_gp_kthread(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, char *s)
 		if (havecbs && haveurgent && haveurgentcbs)
 			break;
 	}
-	pr_info("%s: %s(%d) since %lu g:%lu i:%lu/%lu %c%c%c%c l:%lu %s\n",
+	pr_info("%s: %s(%d) since %lu g:%lu i:%lu %c%c%c%c l:%lu %s\n",
 		rtp->kname,
 		tasks_gp_state_getname(rtp), data_race(rtp->gp_state),
 		jiffies - data_race(rtp->gp_jiffies),
 		data_race(rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq)),
-		data_race(rtp->n_ipis_fails), data_race(rtp->n_ipis),
+		data_race(rtp->n_ipis),
 		".k"[!!data_race(rtp->kthread_ptr)],
 		".C"[havecbs],
 		".u"[haveurgent],
-- 
2.17.1

[PATCH] rcu-tasks: Dump rcu tasks status when the boot-test failed

[Zqiang]

This commit adds a dump RCU task status function to rcu tasks tests,
used to obtain more information to help debug when the RCU tasks
boot-time tests failed.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
---

 syzbot reported the RCU tasks boot-time test failed:
 https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=251e9abcdac140e7ec74

 kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 7f7d1e636217..d9e1e53f4ccf 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -1453,6 +1453,7 @@ struct rcu_tasks_test_desc {
 	const char *name;
 	bool notrun;
 	unsigned long runstart;
+	void (*gp_dbg)(void);
 };
 
 static struct rcu_tasks_test_desc tests[] = {
@@ -1460,6 +1461,8 @@ static struct rcu_tasks_test_desc tests[] = {
 		.name = "call_rcu_tasks()",
 		/* If not defined, the test is skipped. */
 		.notrun = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TASKS_RCU),
+		/* Dump rcu tasks status, if test failed. */
+		.gp_dbg = show_rcu_tasks_classic_gp_kthread
 	},
 	{
 		.name = "call_rcu_tasks_trace()",
@@ -1519,6 +1522,8 @@ static int rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests(void)
 		while (tests[i].notrun) {		// still hanging.
 			if (time_after(jiffies, tests[i].runstart + bst)) {
 				pr_err("%s has failed boot-time tests.\n", tests[i].name);
+				if (tests[i].gp_dbg)
+					tests[i].gp_dbg();
 				ret = -1;
 				break;
 			}
-- 
2.17.1

Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Remove unused struct rcu_tasks's->n_ipis_fails variables

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 06:03:09PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> The RCU tasks trace has been reimplemented by 'commit c27cea4416a3
> ("rcu: Re-implement RCU Tasks Trace in terms of SRCU-fast")', the
> rcu_tasks structure's->n_ipis_fails is no longer used, this commit
> therefore remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>

I have queued both for review and testing, thank you!

This patch produced the expected result in my initial tests.  However,
for the second patch, I used this command to force a stall:

tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --allcpus --duration 15 --configs "TASKS01 TASKS02 TASKS03 RUDE01" --bootargs "rcutorture.stall_cpu=660" --trust-make

Except I got vanilla RCU CPU stall warnings, but not RCU Tasks nor
RCU Tasks Rude stall warnings.  And not even the "grace period number"
pre-stall message.  Probably because I am forgetting something.  But what
did you do to test your change?

							Thanx, Paul

> ---
>  kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index f4da5fad70f5..7f7d1e636217 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct rcu_tasks_percpu {
>   * @gp_start: Most recent grace-period start in jiffies.
>   * @tasks_gp_seq: Number of grace periods completed since boot in upper bits.
>   * @n_ipis: Number of IPIs sent to encourage grace periods to end.
> - * @n_ipis_fails: Number of IPI-send failures.
>   * @kthread_ptr: This flavor's grace-period/callback-invocation kthread.
>   * @lazy_jiffies: Number of jiffies to allow callbacks to be lazy.
>   * @pregp_func: This flavor's pre-grace-period function (optional).
> @@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
>  	unsigned long gp_start;
>  	unsigned long tasks_gp_seq;
>  	unsigned long n_ipis;
> -	unsigned long n_ipis_fails;
>  	struct task_struct *kthread_ptr;
>  	unsigned long lazy_jiffies;
>  	rcu_tasks_gp_func_t gp_func;
> @@ -735,12 +733,12 @@ static void show_rcu_tasks_generic_gp_kthread(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, char *s)
>  		if (havecbs && haveurgent && haveurgentcbs)
>  			break;
>  	}
> -	pr_info("%s: %s(%d) since %lu g:%lu i:%lu/%lu %c%c%c%c l:%lu %s\n",
> +	pr_info("%s: %s(%d) since %lu g:%lu i:%lu %c%c%c%c l:%lu %s\n",
>  		rtp->kname,
>  		tasks_gp_state_getname(rtp), data_race(rtp->gp_state),
>  		jiffies - data_race(rtp->gp_jiffies),
>  		data_race(rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq)),
> -		data_race(rtp->n_ipis_fails), data_race(rtp->n_ipis),
> +		data_race(rtp->n_ipis),
>  		".k"[!!data_race(rtp->kthread_ptr)],
>  		".C"[havecbs],
>  		".u"[haveurgent],
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Remove unused struct rcu_tasks's->n_ipis_fails variables

[Zqiang]

> 
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 06:03:09PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> 
> > 
> > The RCU tasks trace has been reimplemented by 'commit c27cea4416a3
> >  ("rcu: Re-implement RCU Tasks Trace in terms of SRCU-fast")', the
> >  rcu_tasks structure's->n_ipis_fails is no longer used, this commit
> >  therefore remove it.
> >  
> >  Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
> > 
> I have queued both for review and testing, thank you!
> 
> This patch produced the expected result in my initial tests. However,
> for the second patch, I used this command to force a stall:
> 
> tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --allcpus --duration 15 --configs "TASKS01 TASKS02 TASKS03 RUDE01" --bootargs "rcutorture.stall_cpu=660" --trust-make
> 
> Except I got vanilla RCU CPU stall warnings, but not RCU Tasks nor
> RCU Tasks Rude stall warnings. And not even the "grace period number"
> pre-stall message. Probably because I am forgetting something. But what
> did you do to test your change?

Hello, Paul

The rcutorture module use module_init() to load, however the
rcu_tasks_initiate_self_tests() is called in core_initcall(), 
the core_initcall() have a higher priority than module_init().

This is possible, the RCU tasks test may have already completed, 
but the rcutorture may have only just started.

so I use the following modifications to verify:

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index d9e1e53f4ccf..7e5ff5108cdd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -1489,7 +1489,6 @@ static void rcu_tasks_initiate_self_tests(void)
        pr_info("Running RCU Tasks wait API self tests\n");
        tests[0].runstart = jiffies;
        synchronize_rcu_tasks();
-       call_rcu_tasks(&tests[0].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
@@ -1555,6 +1554,7 @@ static void rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn(struct work_struct *work __maybe_unused)
 static int rcu_tasks_verify_schedule_work(void)
 {
        INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rcu_tasks_verify_work, rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn);
+       call_rcu_tasks(&tests[0].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
        rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn(NULL);
        return 0;
 }



Run qemu with bootparams="rcutorture.torture_type=srcu 
rcutorture.stall_cpu=800 rcutorture.stall_cpu_block=1 
rcutorture.stall_no_softlockup=1 rcupdate.rcu_tasks_lazy_ms=120000"

[   30.826022] call_rcu_tasks() has failed boot-time tests.
[   30.826790] rcu_tasks: RTGS_WAIT_CBS(11) since 7596 g:4 i:0 kCuU l:30000 
[   30.827424] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   30.827862] WARNING: kernel/rcu/tasks.h:1533 at rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests+0xa7/0xc0, CPU#1: kworker/1:1/79
[   30.828717] Modules linked in:
[   30.829144] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G        W           7.1.0-rc4+ #25 PREEMPT(lazy)  e641c8af833b714510f82b4c2bc5dbbb1ef1e911
[   30.830176] Tainted: [W]=WARN 
[   30.830468] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[   30.831326] Workqueue: events rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn
....
[  722.218096] INFO: rcu_tasks detected stalls on tasks:
[  722.218689] 0000000095041800: .. nvcsw: 2/2 holdout: 1 idle_cpu: -1/7
[  722.219308] task:rcu_torture_sta state:R  running task     stack:0     pid:122   tgid:122   ppid:2      task_flags:0x208040 flags:0x00080000
[  722.220442] Call Trace:
[  722.220744]  <TASK>
[  722.221035]  __schedule+0x2e9/0x1460
[  722.221449]  ? preempt_schedule+0x30/0x40
[  722.221895]  preempt_schedule_common+0x24/0x90
[  722.222432]  preempt_schedule+0x30/0x40
[  722.222842]  rcu_torture_stall+0x266/0x430
[  722.223286]  ? __kthread_parkme+0x8f/0xe0
[  722.223735]  ? __pfx_rcu_torture_stall+0x10/0x10
[  722.224226]  kthread+0x13d/0x180
[  722.224600]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  722.224996]  ret_from_fork+0x29d/0x3b0
[  722.225669]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  722.226131]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  722.226668]  </TASK>


Thanks
Zqiang


> 
>  Thanx, Paul
> 
> > 
> > ---
> >  kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >  
> >  diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> >  index f4da5fad70f5..7f7d1e636217 100644
> >  --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> >  +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> >  @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct rcu_tasks_percpu {
> >  * @gp_start: Most recent grace-period start in jiffies.
> >  * @tasks_gp_seq: Number of grace periods completed since boot in upper bits.
> >  * @n_ipis: Number of IPIs sent to encourage grace periods to end.
> >  - * @n_ipis_fails: Number of IPI-send failures.
> >  * @kthread_ptr: This flavor's grace-period/callback-invocation kthread.
> >  * @lazy_jiffies: Number of jiffies to allow callbacks to be lazy.
> >  * @pregp_func: This flavor's pre-grace-period function (optional).
> >  @@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ struct rcu_tasks {
> >  unsigned long gp_start;
> >  unsigned long tasks_gp_seq;
> >  unsigned long n_ipis;
> >  - unsigned long n_ipis_fails;
> >  struct task_struct *kthread_ptr;
> >  unsigned long lazy_jiffies;
> >  rcu_tasks_gp_func_t gp_func;
> >  @@ -735,12 +733,12 @@ static void show_rcu_tasks_generic_gp_kthread(struct rcu_tasks *rtp, char *s)
> >  if (havecbs && haveurgent && haveurgentcbs)
> >  break;
> >  }
> >  - pr_info("%s: %s(%d) since %lu g:%lu i:%lu/%lu %c%c%c%c l:%lu %s\n",
> >  + pr_info("%s: %s(%d) since %lu g:%lu i:%lu %c%c%c%c l:%lu %s\n",
> >  rtp->kname,
> >  tasks_gp_state_getname(rtp), data_race(rtp->gp_state),
> >  jiffies - data_race(rtp->gp_jiffies),
> >  data_race(rcu_seq_current(&rtp->tasks_gp_seq)),
> >  - data_race(rtp->n_ipis_fails), data_race(rtp->n_ipis),
> >  + data_race(rtp->n_ipis),
> >  ".k"[!!data_race(rtp->kthread_ptr)],
> >  ".C"[havecbs],
> >  ".u"[haveurgent],
> >  -- 
> >  2.17.1
> >
>

Re: [PATCH] rcu-tasks: Remove unused struct rcu_tasks's->n_ipis_fails variables

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Tue, Jul 07, 2026 at 01:09:21PM +0000, Zqiang wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 06:03:09PM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > The RCU tasks trace has been reimplemented by 'commit c27cea4416a3
> > >  ("rcu: Re-implement RCU Tasks Trace in terms of SRCU-fast")', the
> > >  rcu_tasks structure's->n_ipis_fails is no longer used, this commit
> > >  therefore remove it.
> > >  
> > >  Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
> > > 
> > I have queued both for review and testing, thank you!
> > 
> > This patch produced the expected result in my initial tests. However,
> > for the second patch, I used this command to force a stall:
> > 
> > tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --allcpus --duration 15 --configs "TASKS01 TASKS02 TASKS03 RUDE01" --bootargs "rcutorture.stall_cpu=660" --trust-make
> > 
> > Except I got vanilla RCU CPU stall warnings, but not RCU Tasks nor
> > RCU Tasks Rude stall warnings. And not even the "grace period number"
> > pre-stall message. Probably because I am forgetting something. But what
> > did you do to test your change?
> 
> Hello, Paul
> 
> The rcutorture module use module_init() to load, however the
> rcu_tasks_initiate_self_tests() is called in core_initcall(), 
> the core_initcall() have a higher priority than module_init().
> 
> This is possible, the RCU tasks test may have already completed, 
> but the rcutorture may have only just started.
> 
> so I use the following modifications to verify:
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> index d9e1e53f4ccf..7e5ff5108cdd 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
> @@ -1489,7 +1489,6 @@ static void rcu_tasks_initiate_self_tests(void)
>         pr_info("Running RCU Tasks wait API self tests\n");
>         tests[0].runstart = jiffies;
>         synchronize_rcu_tasks();
> -       call_rcu_tasks(&tests[0].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
>  #endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> @@ -1555,6 +1554,7 @@ static void rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn(struct work_struct *work __maybe_unused)
>  static int rcu_tasks_verify_schedule_work(void)
>  {
>         INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rcu_tasks_verify_work, rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn);
> +       call_rcu_tasks(&tests[0].rh, test_rcu_tasks_callback);
>         rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn(NULL);
>         return 0;
>  }

Or I can just comment out the call_rcu_tasks() entirely, correct?

> Run qemu with bootparams="rcutorture.torture_type=srcu 
> rcutorture.stall_cpu=800 rcutorture.stall_cpu_block=1 
> rcutorture.stall_no_softlockup=1 rcupdate.rcu_tasks_lazy_ms=120000"

OK, one of my problems was that I was forgetting stall_cpu_block=1,
which was causing all sorts of other stalls to confuse things.  So thank
you for that!

> [   30.826022] call_rcu_tasks() has failed boot-time tests.
> [   30.826790] rcu_tasks: RTGS_WAIT_CBS(11) since 7596 g:4 i:0 kCuU l:30000 
> [   30.827424] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [   30.827862] WARNING: kernel/rcu/tasks.h:1533 at rcu_tasks_verify_self_tests+0xa7/0xc0, CPU#1: kworker/1:1/79
> [   30.828717] Modules linked in:
> [   30.829144] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 79 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G        W           7.1.0-rc4+ #25 PREEMPT(lazy)  e641c8af833b714510f82b4c2bc5dbbb1ef1e911
> [   30.830176] Tainted: [W]=WARN 
> [   30.830468] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.3-0-ga6ed6b701f0a-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> [   30.831326] Workqueue: events rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn
> ....
> [  722.218096] INFO: rcu_tasks detected stalls on tasks:
> [  722.218689] 0000000095041800: .. nvcsw: 2/2 holdout: 1 idle_cpu: -1/7
> [  722.219308] task:rcu_torture_sta state:R  running task     stack:0     pid:122   tgid:122   ppid:2      task_flags:0x208040 flags:0x00080000
> [  722.220442] Call Trace:
> [  722.220744]  <TASK>
> [  722.221035]  __schedule+0x2e9/0x1460
> [  722.221449]  ? preempt_schedule+0x30/0x40
> [  722.221895]  preempt_schedule_common+0x24/0x90
> [  722.222432]  preempt_schedule+0x30/0x40
> [  722.222842]  rcu_torture_stall+0x266/0x430
> [  722.223286]  ? __kthread_parkme+0x8f/0xe0
> [  722.223735]  ? __pfx_rcu_torture_stall+0x10/0x10
> [  722.224226]  kthread+0x13d/0x180
> [  722.224600]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [  722.224996]  ret_from_fork+0x29d/0x3b0
> [  722.225669]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [  722.226131]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> [  722.226668]  </TASK>

But if I comment out that call_rcu_tasks() entirely, then I don't need
rcutorture to explictly generate a stall.  Which means that this:

tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --allcpus --duration 3 --configs "TASKS01" --trust-make

Gets me this:

[   30.734277] call_rcu_tasks() has failed boot-time tests.
[   30.735048] rcu_tasks: RTGS_INVOKE_CBS(10) since 4 g:524 i:0 kCuU l:250 
[   30.736032] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   30.736668] WARNING: kernel/rcu/tasks.h:1534 at rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn+0x86/0xc0, CPU#0: kworker/0:2/59
[   30.737929] Modules linked in:
[   30.738467] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 59 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 7.1.0-rc4-00077-ge5ee2ea2d00a-dirty #1508 PREEMPT(full) 
[   30.739873] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
[   30.740910] Workqueue: events rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn
[   30.741631] RIP: 0010:rcu_tasks_verify_work_fn+0x86/0xc0
[   30.742298] Code: 74 27 41 83 fc 01 75 25 48 8b 35 35 0a 9f 01 5b b9 e8 03 00 00 48 c7 c2 60 14 58 ae 5d bf 04 00 00 00 41 5c e9 2b 89 f6 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 5b 5d 41 5c c3 cc cc cc cc 48 8b 73 10 48 c7 c7 e8 e9 9e
[   30.744382] RSP: 0018:ffffa0cf00207e28 EFLAGS: 00010246
[   30.744977] RAX: 000000000000003c RBX: ffffffffacf5f100 RCX: 3fffffffffffdfff
[   30.745816] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffffffffff RDI: 0000000000000001
[   30.746657] RBP: 0000000000007530 R08: ffffffffacf5ccc8 R09: 3fffffffffffdfff
[   30.747494] R10: fffffffface7cce0 R11: 0000000000000784 R12: 00000000ffffffff
[   30.748238] R13: ffffffffae581460 R14: ffff980001055605 R15: ffff980001b30600
[   30.749058] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98007198a000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[   30.749955] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   30.750653] CR2: 0000000000402007 CR3: 00000000022fa000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[   30.751483] Call Trace:
[   30.751777]  <TASK>
[   30.752032]  process_one_work+0x20d/0x6a0
[   30.752546]  ? lock_is_held_type+0x9e/0x120
[   30.753025]  worker_thread+0x195/0x350
[   30.753511]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[   30.754003]  kthread+0xe8/0x120
[   30.754412]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[   30.754865]  ret_from_fork+0x2a7/0x310
[   30.755306]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[   30.755767]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[   30.756297]  </TASK>
[   30.756608] irq event stamp: 2747
[   30.756988] hardirqs last  enabled at (2755): [<ffffffffab13cfbd>] __up_console_sem+0x4d/0x60
[   30.757977] hardirqs last disabled at (2766): [<ffffffffab13cfa2>] __up_console_sem+0x32/0x60
[   30.758961] softirqs last  enabled at (2430): [<ffffffffab0c357d>] process_one_work+0x20d/0x6a0
[   30.759943] softirqs last disabled at (2426): [<ffffffffabdf6b2c>] neigh_periodic_work+0x2c/0x380
[   30.760970] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Which has the additional information from your patch.

Thank you for bearing with me!

							Thanx, Paul