From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Cc: rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2022 00:42:39 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k0bz7i1s.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pmls6nt7.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> writes:
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 05:31:10PM +0800, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I can reproduce it in a ppc virtual cloud server provided by Oregon
>>> State University. Following is what I do:
>>> 1) curl -l https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/snapshot/linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz
>>> -o linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz
>>> 2) tar zxf linux-5.18-rc1.tar.gz
>>> 3) cp config linux-5.18-rc1/.config
>>> 4) cd linux-5.18-rc1
>>> 5) make vmlinux -j 8
>>> 6) qemu-system-ppc64 -kernel vmlinux -nographic -vga none -no-reboot
>>> -smp 2 (QEMU 4.2.1)
>>> 7) after 12 rounds, the bug got reproduced:
>>> (http://154.223.142.244/logs/20220406/qemu.log.txt)
>>
>> Just to make sure, are you both seeing the same thing? Last I knew,
>> Zhouyi was chasing an RCU-tasks issue that appears only in kernels
>> built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y, which Miguel does not have set. Or did
>> I miss something?
>>
>> Miguel is instead seeing an RCU CPU stall warning where RCU's grace-period
>> kthread slept for three milliseconds, but did not wake up for more than
>> 20 seconds. This kthread would normally have awakened on CPU 1, but
>> CPU 1 looks to me to be very unhealthy, as can be seen in your console
>> output below (but maybe my idea of what is healthy for powerpc systems
>> is outdated). Please see also the inline annotations.
>>
>> Thoughts from the PPC guys?
>
> I haven't seen it in my testing. But using Miguel's config I can
> reproduce it seemingly on every boot.
>
> For me it bisects to:
>
> 35de589cb879 ("powerpc/time: improve decrementer clockevent processing")
>
> Which seems plausible.
>
> Reverting that on mainline makes the bug go away.
>
> I don't see an obvious bug in the diff, but I could be wrong, or the old
> code was papering over an existing bug?
>
> I'll try and work out what it is about Miguel's config that exposes
> this vs our defconfig, that might give us a clue.
It's CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=n which triggers the stall.
I can reproduce just with:
$ make ppc64le_guest_defconfig
$ ./scripts/config -d HIGH_RES_TIMERS
We have no defconfigs that disable HIGH_RES_TIMERS, I didn't even
realise you could disable it TBH :)
The Rust CI has it disabled because I copied that from the x86 defconfig
they were using back when I added the Rust support. I think that was
meant to be a stripped down fast config for CI, but the result is it's
just using a badly tested combination which is not helpful.
So I'll send a patch to turn HIGH_RES_TIMERS on for the Rust CI, and we
can debug this further without blocking them.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-08 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 21:41 rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-06 9:31 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-06 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-06 18:25 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-06 19:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-07 2:26 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-07 10:07 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-07 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-07 17:05 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-07 17:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-07 23:14 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-08 1:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 7:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-08 10:02 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-08 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 14:25 ` Zhouyi Zhou
2022-04-10 11:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-11 3:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-12 6:53 ` Michael Ellerman
2022-04-12 13:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 13:52 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-08 14:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 14:42 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2022-04-08 15:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-08 17:02 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-04-13 5:11 ` Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-13 6:10 ` Low-res tick handler device not going to ONESHOT_STOPPED when tick is stopped (was: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU) Nicholas Piggin
2022-04-14 17:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-04-22 15:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-04-23 2:29 ` Re: Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87k0bz7i1s.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zhouzhouyi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox