From: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>
To: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] rust: alloc: add Vec::pop
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 22:11:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D8LFRQ5IX33R.35U012LFZ06W0@proton.me> (raw)
On Thu Mar 20, 2025 at 2:52 PM CET, Alice Ryhl wrote:
> This introduces a basic method that our custom Vec is missing. I expect
> that it will be used in many places, but at the time of writing, Rust
> Binder has six calls to Vec::pop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>
> ---
> rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs b/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> index 95e752ed27395fce72d372976b74fb1b0e957194..9943358c70aa63f5ad7ed9782cb8879d7a80a8fb 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/alloc/kvec.rs
> @@ -302,6 +302,37 @@ pub fn push(&mut self, v: T, flags: Flags) -> Result<(), AllocError> {
> Ok(())
> }
>
> + /// Removes the last element from a vector and returns it, or `None` if it is empty.
> + ///
> + /// # Examples
> + ///
> + /// ```
> + /// let mut v = KVec::new();
> + /// v.push(1, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + /// v.push(2, GFP_KERNEL)?;
> + /// assert_eq!(&v, &[1, 2]);
> + ///
> + /// assert_eq!(v.pop(), Some(2));
> + /// assert_eq!(v.pop(), Some(1));
> + /// assert_eq!(v.pop(), None);
> + /// # Ok::<(), Error>(())
> + /// ```
> + pub fn pop(&mut self) -> Option<T> {
> + let Some(len_sub_1) = self.len.checked_sub(1) else {
> + return None;
> + };
Isn't it possible to do:?
let len_sub_1 = self.len.checked_sub(1)?;
> +
> + // INVARIANT: If the first `len` elements are valid, then the first `len-1` elements are
Please add spaces around `-`.
> + // valid.
> + self.len = len_sub_1;
> +
> + // INVARIANT: This invalidates a value in this vector's allocation, but the Vec invariants
> + // do not require it to be valid because `self.len <= len_sub_1`.
I don't think this should be an `INVARIANT` comment. Maybe we don't even
need it.
---
Cheers,
Benno
> + // SAFETY: Since `len_sub_1` is less than the value `self.len` had at the beginning of
> + // `pop`, this index holds a valid value.
> + Some(unsafe { self.as_mut_ptr().add(len_sub_1).read() })
> + }
> +
> /// Creates a new [`Vec`] instance with at least the given capacity.
> ///
> /// # Examples
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 22:11 Benno Lossin [this message]
2025-03-21 7:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] rust: alloc: add Vec::pop Alice Ryhl
2025-03-21 9:23 ` Benno Lossin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-20 13:52 [PATCH 0/5] Additional methods for Vec Alice Ryhl
2025-03-20 13:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] rust: alloc: add Vec::pop Alice Ryhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D8LFRQ5IX33R.35U012LFZ06W0@proton.me \
--to=benno.lossin@proton.me \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox