* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-26 0:04 [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T> Danilo Krummrich
@ 2026-05-26 0:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-26 1:08 ` Eliot Courtney
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2026-05-26 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, gary, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross
Cc: driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Tue May 26, 2026 at 2:04 AM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Devres::new() registers a callback with the C devres subsystem via
> devres_node_add(). If the Devres is leaked (e.g. via
> core::mem::forget(), which is safe), its Drop impl never runs, and the
> devres release callback will revoke the inner Revocable on device
> unbind, which drops T in place. If T contains non-'static references,
> those may be dangling by that point.
>
> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
> Devres.
>
> Fixes: 76c01ded724b ("rust: add devres abstraction")
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-26 0:04 [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T> Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-26 0:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
@ 2026-05-26 1:08 ` Eliot Courtney
2026-05-26 1:49 ` Alexandre Courbot
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eliot Courtney @ 2026-05-26 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danilo Krummrich, gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, gary, bjorn3_gh,
lossin, a.hindborg, aliceryhl, tmgross
Cc: driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Tue May 26, 2026 at 9:04 AM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Devres::new() registers a callback with the C devres subsystem via
> devres_node_add(). If the Devres is leaked (e.g. via
> core::mem::forget(), which is safe), its Drop impl never runs, and the
> devres release callback will revoke the inner Revocable on device
> unbind, which drops T in place. If T contains non-'static references,
> those may be dangling by that point.
>
> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
> Devres.
>
> Fixes: 76c01ded724b ("rust: add devres abstraction")
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Eliot Courtney <ecourtney@nvidia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-26 0:04 [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T> Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-26 0:09 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-26 1:08 ` Eliot Courtney
@ 2026-05-26 1:49 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-05-27 14:44 ` Gary Guo
2026-05-28 23:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Courbot @ 2026-05-26 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danilo Krummrich
Cc: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, gary, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross, driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Tue May 26, 2026 at 9:04 AM JST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Devres::new() registers a callback with the C devres subsystem via
> devres_node_add(). If the Devres is leaked (e.g. via
> core::mem::forget(), which is safe), its Drop impl never runs, and the
> devres release callback will revoke the inner Revocable on device
> unbind, which drops T in place. If T contains non-'static references,
> those may be dangling by that point.
>
> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
> Devres.
>
> Fixes: 76c01ded724b ("rust: add devres abstraction")
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-26 0:04 [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T> Danilo Krummrich
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-05-26 1:49 ` Alexandre Courbot
@ 2026-05-27 14:44 ` Gary Guo
2026-05-27 18:04 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-28 23:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
4 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gary Guo @ 2026-05-27 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danilo Krummrich, gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, gary, bjorn3_gh,
lossin, a.hindborg, aliceryhl, tmgross
Cc: driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Tue May 26, 2026 at 1:04 AM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> Devres::new() registers a callback with the C devres subsystem via
> devres_node_add(). If the Devres is leaked (e.g. via
> core::mem::forget(), which is safe), its Drop impl never runs, and the
> devres release callback will revoke the inner Revocable on device
> unbind, which drops T in place. If T contains non-'static references,
> those may be dangling by that point.
>
> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
> Devres.
The bound should be added on `Devres::new` instead.
Best,
Gary
>
> Fixes: 76c01ded724b ("rust: add devres abstraction")
> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
> ---
> rust/kernel/devres.rs | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/rust/kernel/devres.rs b/rust/kernel/devres.rs
> index 9e5f93aed20c..2e258d31a45c 100644
> --- a/rust/kernel/devres.rs
> +++ b/rust/kernel/devres.rs
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ struct Inner<T> {
> /// # Ok(())
> /// # }
> /// ```
> -pub struct Devres<T: Send> {
> +pub struct Devres<T: Send + 'static> {
> dev: ARef<Device>,
> inner: Arc<Inner<T>>,
> }
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ pub(super) unsafe fn devres_node_remove(
> }
> }
>
> -impl<T: Send> Devres<T> {
> +impl<T: Send + 'static> Devres<T> {
> /// Creates a new [`Devres`] instance of the given `data`.
> ///
> /// The `data` encapsulated within the returned `Devres` instance' `data` will be
> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ unsafe impl<T: Send> Send for Devres<T> {}
> // SAFETY: `Devres` can be shared with any task, if `T: Sync`.
> unsafe impl<T: Send + Sync> Sync for Devres<T> {}
>
> -impl<T: Send> Drop for Devres<T> {
> +impl<T: Send + 'static> Drop for Devres<T> {
> fn drop(&mut self) {
> // SAFETY: When `drop` runs, it is guaranteed that nobody is accessing the revocable data
> // anymore, hence it is safe not to wait for the grace period to finish.
>
> base-commit: 56785dcb2ef6d3cff82ac33f2e34db94377416a3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-27 14:44 ` Gary Guo
@ 2026-05-27 18:04 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-27 18:07 ` Gary Guo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2026-05-27 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary Guo
Cc: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross, driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Wed May 27, 2026 at 4:44 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Tue May 26, 2026 at 1:04 AM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
>> Devres.
>
> The bound should be added on `Devres::new` instead.
I did consider this as it is generally recommended to minimize bounds on
structs.
However, a Devres<T> with non-'static T is semantically nonsensical, not just
unconstructible, and I think type level bound represents that better.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-27 18:04 ` Danilo Krummrich
@ 2026-05-27 18:07 ` Gary Guo
2026-05-27 18:13 ` Danilo Krummrich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gary Guo @ 2026-05-27 18:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danilo Krummrich, Gary Guo
Cc: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross, driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Wed May 27, 2026 at 7:04 PM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 4:44 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
>> On Tue May 26, 2026 at 1:04 AM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
>>> Devres.
>>
>> The bound should be added on `Devres::new` instead.
>
> I did consider this as it is generally recommended to minimize bounds on
> structs.
>
> However, a Devres<T> with non-'static T is semantically nonsensical, not just
> unconstructible, and I think type level bound represents that better.
Technically `Devres` can contain references to the registration, which is known
to outlive the bound device.
Best,
Gary
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-27 18:07 ` Gary Guo
@ 2026-05-27 18:13 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-27 19:25 ` Gary Guo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2026-05-27 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary Guo
Cc: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross, driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Wed May 27, 2026 at 8:07 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 7:04 PM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 4:44 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
>>> On Tue May 26, 2026 at 1:04 AM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>>> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
>>>> Devres.
>>>
>>> The bound should be added on `Devres::new` instead.
>>
>> I did consider this as it is generally recommended to minimize bounds on
>> structs.
>>
>> However, a Devres<T> with non-'static T is semantically nonsensical, not just
>> unconstructible, and I think type level bound represents that better.
>
> Technically `Devres` can contain references to the registration, which is known
> to outlive the bound device.
That's technically true, but how would you express "outlives the device" as a
lifetime bound on Devres?
Additionally, if the borrowed data outlives the device bound, you don't need
device-managed revocation for it in the first place.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-27 18:13 ` Danilo Krummrich
@ 2026-05-27 19:25 ` Gary Guo
2026-05-27 19:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gary Guo @ 2026-05-27 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danilo Krummrich, Gary Guo
Cc: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross, driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Wed May 27, 2026 at 7:13 PM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 8:07 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
>> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 7:04 PM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 4:44 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
>>>> On Tue May 26, 2026 at 1:04 AM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>>>> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
>>>>> Devres.
>>>>
>>>> The bound should be added on `Devres::new` instead.
>>>
>>> I did consider this as it is generally recommended to minimize bounds on
>>> structs.
>>>
>>> However, a Devres<T> with non-'static T is semantically nonsensical, not just
>>> unconstructible, and I think type level bound represents that better.
>>
>> Technically `Devres` can contain references to the registration, which is known
>> to outlive the bound device.
>
> That's technically true, but how would you express "outlives the device" as a
> lifetime bound on Devres?
Just having the lifetime would mean it outlives the device (lifetimes that
cannot be guaranteed to outlive the device cannot be used in devres).
In a world with registration data, I would imagine all lifetime parameters on
registration data are also valid for `Devres`.
>
> Additionally, if the borrowed data outlives the device bound, you don't need
> device-managed revocation for it in the first place.
Resources that depend on both registration data and device resource perhaps?
Best,
Gary
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-27 19:25 ` Gary Guo
@ 2026-05-27 19:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-05-28 23:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2026-05-27 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary Guo
Cc: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross, driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Wed May 27, 2026 at 9:25 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 7:13 PM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 8:07 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
>>> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 7:04 PM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>>> On Wed May 27, 2026 at 4:44 PM CEST, Gary Guo wrote:
>>>>> On Tue May 26, 2026 at 1:04 AM BST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>>>>> Add a 'static bound to prevent storing types with borrowed data in
>>>>>> Devres.
>>>>>
>>>>> The bound should be added on `Devres::new` instead.
>>>>
>>>> I did consider this as it is generally recommended to minimize bounds on
>>>> structs.
>>>>
>>>> However, a Devres<T> with non-'static T is semantically nonsensical, not just
>>>> unconstructible, and I think type level bound represents that better.
>>>
>>> Technically `Devres` can contain references to the registration, which is known
>>> to outlive the bound device.
>>
>> That's technically true, but how would you express "outlives the device" as a
>> lifetime bound on Devres?
>
> Just having the lifetime would mean it outlives the device (lifetimes that
> cannot be guaranteed to outlive the device cannot be used in devres).
>
> In a world with registration data, I would imagine all lifetime parameters on
> registration data are also valid for `Devres`.
[...]
> Resources that depend on both registration data and device resource perhaps?
You'd still need a separate constructor for this, and I'm still not convinced
that this makes a lot of sense.
That said if you feel strongly about it, I don't mind moving the 'static bound
to new() too much.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-27 19:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
@ 2026-05-28 23:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2026-05-28 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gary Guo
Cc: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross, driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Wed May 27, 2026 at 9:49 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> That said if you feel strongly about it, I don't mind moving the 'static bound
> to new() too much.
Keeping the bound on the struct for now, given that we agree to move it if it
creeps to more places off-list.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
2026-05-26 0:04 [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T> Danilo Krummrich
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2026-05-27 14:44 ` Gary Guo
@ 2026-05-28 23:10 ` Danilo Krummrich
4 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Danilo Krummrich @ 2026-05-28 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Danilo Krummrich
Cc: gregkh, rafael, ojeda, boqun, gary, bjorn3_gh, lossin, a.hindborg,
aliceryhl, tmgross, driver-core, linux-kernel, rust-for-linux
On Tue, 26 May 2026 02:04:41 +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
Applied, thanks!
Branch: driver-core-testing
Tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/driver-core/driver-core.git
[1/1] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres<T>
commit: 016267b521b1
The patch will appear in the next linux-next integration (typically within 24
hours on weekdays).
The patch is in the driver-core-testing branch and will be promoted to
driver-core-next after validation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread