From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "FUJITA Tomonori" <tomo@flapping.org>
Cc: <a.hindborg@kernel.org>, <aliceryhl@google.com>,
<arve@android.com>, <boqun@kernel.org>, <brauner@kernel.org>,
<cmllamas@google.com>, <gary@garyguo.net>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <ojeda@kernel.org>,
<tkjos@android.com>, <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
<bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, <dakr@kernel.org>,
<daniel.almeida@collabora.com>, <frederic@kernel.org>,
<jstultz@google.com>, <lossin@kernel.org>, <lyude@redhat.com>,
<sboyd@kernel.org>, <tamird@kernel.org>, <tglx@kernel.org>,
<tmgross@umich.edu>, <work@onurozkan.dev>,
<rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>, <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] rust: time: make Delta generic over its time unit
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 11:26:49 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DKK236MNP2NH.MFG9QEPIEH1M@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807.211008.1388653306665929214.tomo@flapping.org>
On Fri Aug 7, 2026 at 9:10 PM JST, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
>>> +
>>> +impl TimeUnit for Nsec {
>>> + type Repr = i64;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /// A span of time.
>>> ///
>>> -/// This struct represents a span of time, with its value stored as nanoseconds.
>>> -/// The value can represent any valid i64 value, including negative, zero, and
>>> -/// positive numbers.
>>> +/// The span is stored in the unit given by the type parameter `U` (see
>>> +/// [`TimeUnit`]); its value has type `U::Repr`. `U` defaults to [`Nsec`], so a
>>> +/// plain [`Delta`] is a span in nanoseconds. The value can be negative, zero, or
>>> +/// positive.
>>> #[derive(Copy, Clone, PartialEq, PartialOrd, Eq, Ord, Debug)]
>>> -pub struct Delta {
>>> - nanos: i64,
>>> +pub struct Delta<U: TimeUnit = Nsec> {
>>> + value: U::Repr,
>>> }
>>>
>>> impl ops::Add for Delta {
>>
>> When you add `Jiffy` later, this impl block will only cover
>> `Delta<Nsec>`. Is that intentional, or did you intend to support
>> all these operations operations for `Delta<Jiffy>` as well?
>
> Intentional. Delta<Jiffy> exists to carry a jiffies-valued timeout
> across the C boundary; it is not meant as a general arithmetic type. I
> can add them if a user needs them.
Is there a reason for not doing it now? Common arithmetic sounds useful
for any unit, and since they are already agreed to panic at the bounds
we can constrain them on `U` implementing the corresponding traits.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-09 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 7:32 [PATCH v5 0/7] rust: use Delta instead of raw jiffies for timeouts and delays FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 7:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] rust: time: make Delta generic over its time unit FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 9:44 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-08-07 12:10 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-09 2:26 ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-08-10 2:23 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-10 11:24 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-08-10 12:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-10 14:39 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-08-06 7:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] rust: time: add jiffies time unit for Delta FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 7:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] rust: time: add Delta::as_millis_ceil() FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 9:47 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-08-07 13:26 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 7:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] rust: time: add Delta::to_jiffies() for timeout conversion FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 9:50 ` Andreas Hindborg
2026-08-07 12:15 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 11:50 ` Gary Guo
2026-08-07 12:38 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-07 12:59 ` Gary Guo
2026-08-07 13:13 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 7:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] rust: workqueue: take a Delta<Jiffy> for the enqueue delay FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 7:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] rust: sync: condvar: use Delta<Jiffy> for timeout and result FUJITA Tomonori
2026-08-06 7:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] rust: time: remove unused Jiffies/Msecs helpers FUJITA Tomonori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DKK236MNP2NH.MFG9QEPIEH1M@nvidia.com \
--to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.almeida@collabora.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@gmail.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tamird@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=tomo@flapping.org \
--cc=work@onurozkan.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox