From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] block: Add run_todo() operation
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 11:09:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac1d3825-8a10-42e1-9eaa-f2ba51216660@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24ef93b9-7385-4dda-8912-f7c78f9705d1@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On 9/21/26 10:08 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> I think post_release() is misleading because post_release() is also called
> when disk->fops->open() in blkdev_get_whole() failed (and therefore
> bdev->bd_disk->fops->release() in blkdev_put_whole() from blkdev_get_whole()
> was not called).
Has it been considered to call the new callback only if fops->release()
has been invoked? Here is an (untested) example of how this could be
implemented:
diff --git a/block/bdev.c b/block/bdev.c
index cd8323083740..82be4812a7a0 100644
--- a/block/bdev.c
+++ b/block/bdev.c
@@ -766,7 +766,8 @@ static void blkdev_put_whole(struct block_device *bdev)
bdev->bd_disk->fops->release(bdev->bd_disk);
}
-static int blkdev_get_whole(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode)
+static int blkdev_get_whole(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode,
+ bool *called_release)
{
struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk;
int ret;
@@ -793,18 +794,20 @@ static int blkdev_get_whole(struct block_device
*bdev, blk_mode_t mode)
ret = bdev_disk_changed(disk, false);
if (ret && (mode & BLK_OPEN_STRICT_SCAN)) {
blkdev_put_whole(bdev);
+ *called_release = true;
return ret;
}
}
return 0;
}
-static int blkdev_get_part(struct block_device *part, blk_mode_t mode)
+static int blkdev_get_part(struct block_device *part, blk_mode_t mode,
+ bool *called_release)
{
struct gendisk *disk = part->bd_disk;
int ret;
- ret = blkdev_get_whole(bdev_whole(part), mode);
+ ret = blkdev_get_whole(bdev_whole(part), mode, called_release);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -821,6 +824,7 @@ static int blkdev_get_part(struct block_device
*part, blk_mode_t mode)
out_blkdev_put:
blkdev_put_whole(bdev_whole(part));
+ *called_release = true;
return ret;
}
@@ -973,6 +977,7 @@ int bdev_open(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t
mode, void *holder,
{
bool unblock_events = true;
struct gendisk *disk = bdev->bd_disk;
+ bool called_release = false;
int ret;
if (holder) {
@@ -997,9 +1002,9 @@ int bdev_open(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t
mode, void *holder,
if (!bdev_may_open(bdev, mode))
goto put_module;
if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
- ret = blkdev_get_part(bdev, mode);
+ ret = blkdev_get_part(bdev, mode, &called_release);
else
- ret = blkdev_get_whole(bdev, mode);
+ ret = blkdev_get_whole(bdev, mode, &called_release);
if (ret)
goto put_module;
bdev_claim_write_access(bdev, mode);
@@ -1037,7 +1042,14 @@ int bdev_open(struct block_device *bdev,
blk_mode_t mode, void *holder,
return 0;
put_module:
+ if (holder)
+ bd_abort_claiming(bdev, holder);
+ mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
+ if (called_release && disk->fops->post_release)
+ disk->fops->post_release(disk);
+ disk_unblock_events(disk);
module_put(disk->fops->owner);
+ return ret;
abort_claiming:
if (holder)
bd_abort_claiming(bdev, holder);
@@ -1189,6 +1201,9 @@ void bdev_release(struct file *bdev_file)
blkdev_put_whole(bdev);
mutex_unlock(&disk->open_mutex);
+ if (disk->fops->post_release)
+ disk->fops->post_release(disk);
+
module_put(disk->fops->owner);
put_no_open:
blkdev_put_no_open(bdev);
diff --git a/include/linux/blkdev.h b/include/linux/blkdev.h
index 4f7905c3412b..f2a2f70a9582 100644
--- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
+++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
@@ -1577,6 +1577,7 @@ struct block_device_operations {
unsigned int flags);
int (*open)(struct gendisk *disk, blk_mode_t mode);
void (*release)(struct gendisk *disk);
+ void (*post_release)(struct gendisk *disk);
int (*ioctl)(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode,
unsigned cmd, unsigned long arg);
int (*compat_ioctl)(struct block_device *bdev, blk_mode_t mode,
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-19 10:50 [PATCH v4 1/2] block: Add run_todo() operation Tetsuo Handa
2026-09-19 10:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] loop: Perform __loop_clr_fd() from run_todo callback Tetsuo Handa
2026-09-21 17:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-09-21 17:27 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] block: Add run_todo() operation Bart Van Assche
2026-09-22 5:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-09-22 18:09 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2026-09-23 5:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2026-09-23 17:05 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac1d3825-8a10-42e1-9eaa-f2ba51216660@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox