Sashiko discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
To: sashiko@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: cover letter not considered Fwd: [GIT PULL 0/7] KVM: s390: Fixes for 7.2
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 18:42:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd8d55fa-a42d-4f02-89dd-7eb6c587da69@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727095720.9150-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>

Folks,

I am a bit puzzled. Looking at https://sashiko.dev/#/?list=org.kernel.vger.linux-s390
I do see  1,2,3,4,5,6,7 but not 0 for the PULL request above
  Clicking on on of those mails then also has the 0 mail so its there
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727095720.9150-2-borntraeger%40linux.ibm.com

but during review this seems to have been lost. This is unfortunate as the cover letter might
help to find the right tree and with 3 failed applies several already fixed
things (in those 3 patches) are reported instead.


For other pull requests I DO see GIT PULL 0/x. Just search for PULL
on https://sashiko.dev/#/?list=org.kernel.vger.linux-s390
to see bad examples (my pull) and good examples from Claudio.
As we both used git send-email I am puzzled what I did wrong.

any quick idea?

Christian

PS: in addition to that, those patches DID apply to torvalds/master at the point of submission.



-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: [GIT PULL 0/7] KVM: s390: Fixes for 7.2
Datum: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:57:13 +0200
Von: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
An: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Kopie (CC): KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>, Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>, Jaehoon Kim <jhkim@linux.ibm.com>, Douglas Freimuth <freimuth@linux.ibm.com>, Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>

Paolo,

some more fixes triggered by AI bug reports or testing.
Mostly for PCI support.
This also has a regression fix that we introduced in 7.2-rc1

The following changes since commit 3e3aa6da87d30a0064a17b836685cd43c90a3572:

   KVM: s390: pci: Fix handling of AIF enable without AISB (2026-07-09 16:23:10 +0200)

are available in the Git repository at:

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git  tags/kvm-s390-master-7.2-2

for you to fetch changes up to 9972befc3e34ff8b6847198c84f11bfc312dde40:

   KVM: s390: Fall back to short-term pinning in MAP ioctl (2026-07-27 09:23:53 +0200)


All fixes had no new sashiko findings, just pre-existing issues or
finding that are being fixed by other patches of the series.

We have some more fixes pending for gmap and vfio-ccw that still need
testing or sashiko fixups, but we should process these fixes now.


----------------------------------------------------------------
KVM: s390: Fixes for 7.2

- several fixes for PCI passthru in s390 kvm
- fix a 7.2-rc regression in the adapter interrupt mapping code

----------------------------------------------------------------
Farhan Ali (6):
       KVM: s390: pci: Reject adapter interrupt forwarding if already enabled
       KVM: s390: pci: Fix memory accounting for pinned/unpinned pages
       KVM: s390: pci: Fix missing error codes and memory unaccounting
       KVM: s390: pci: Fix NULL dereference on AIBV allocation failure
       KVM: s390: pci: Fix resource leak on IRQ registration failure
       KVM: s390: pci: Validate AIBV and AISB before pinning guest pages

Jaehoon Kim (1):
       KVM: s390: Fall back to short-term pinning in MAP ioctl

  Documentation/virt/kvm/devices/s390_flic.rst |  15 +++-
  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h             |   5 ++
  arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c                    |  56 ++++++++++----
  arch/s390/kvm/pci.c                          | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++------
  arch/s390/kvm/pci.h                          |   2 +
  5 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)


       reply	other threads:[~2026-07-30 16:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20260727095720.9150-1-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
2026-07-30 16:42 ` Christian Borntraeger [this message]
2026-07-31 15:02   ` cover letter not considered Fwd: [GIT PULL 0/7] KVM: s390: Fixes for 7.2 Derek Barbosa
2026-08-03  7:34     ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-08-04 20:01       ` Derek Barbosa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dd8d55fa-a42d-4f02-89dd-7eb6c587da69@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox