[PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 05/32] sched_ext: Reject direct slice and dsq_vtime writes for cid-form schedulers

[Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>]

Direct writes to p->scx.slice and p->scx.dsq_vtime bypass
scx_bpf_task_set_slice/dsq_vtime() and the authority checks they carry.
Those checks exist for sub-schedulers, which attach only through the
cid-form struct_ops, so the direct writes only need to be closed there.

Give sched_ext_ops_cid its own verifier ops that reject the two fields.
cid-form is a new interface with no legacy users, so there is no
compatibility to keep. The cpu-form keeps direct writes, and the deprecation
warning they carried is dropped.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index f4725698f5ef..4a93ed72e5aa 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -7003,6 +7003,21 @@ static bool bpf_scx_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 	return btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
 }
 
+/* common to both forms: only scx.disallow is writable */
+static int bpf_scx_btf_struct_access_common(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
+					    int off, int size)
+{
+	const struct btf_type *t;
+
+	t = btf_type_by_id(reg->btf, reg->btf_id);
+	if (t == task_struct_type &&
+	    off >= offsetof(struct task_struct, scx.disallow) &&
+	    off + size <= offsetofend(struct task_struct, scx.disallow))
+		return SCALAR_VALUE;
+
+	return -EACCES;
+}
+
 static int bpf_scx_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 				     const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off,
 				     int size)
@@ -7011,23 +7026,22 @@ static int bpf_scx_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 
 	t = btf_type_by_id(reg->btf, reg->btf_id);
 	if (t == task_struct_type) {
-		/*
-		 * COMPAT: Will be removed in v6.23.
-		 */
 		if ((off >= offsetof(struct task_struct, scx.slice) &&
 		     off + size <= offsetofend(struct task_struct, scx.slice)) ||
 		    (off >= offsetof(struct task_struct, scx.dsq_vtime) &&
-		     off + size <= offsetofend(struct task_struct, scx.dsq_vtime))) {
-			pr_warn_ratelimited("sched_ext: Writing directly to p->scx.slice/dsq_vtime is deprecated, use scx_bpf_task_set_slice/dsq_vtime()\n");
-			return SCALAR_VALUE;
-		}
-
-		if (off >= offsetof(struct task_struct, scx.disallow) &&
-		    off + size <= offsetofend(struct task_struct, scx.disallow))
+		     off + size <= offsetofend(struct task_struct, scx.dsq_vtime)))
 			return SCALAR_VALUE;
 	}
 
-	return -EACCES;
+	return bpf_scx_btf_struct_access_common(reg, off, size);
+}
+
+/* cid-form rejects direct slice and dsq_vtime writes in favor of the kfuncs */
+static int bpf_scx_cid_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
+					 const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int off,
+					 int size)
+{
+	return bpf_scx_btf_struct_access_common(reg, off, size);
 }
 
 static const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_scx_verifier_ops = {
@@ -7036,6 +7050,12 @@ static const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_scx_verifier_ops = {
 	.btf_struct_access = bpf_scx_btf_struct_access,
 };
 
+static const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_scx_cid_verifier_ops = {
+	.get_func_proto = bpf_base_func_proto,
+	.is_valid_access = bpf_scx_is_valid_access,
+	.btf_struct_access = bpf_scx_cid_btf_struct_access,
+};
+
 static int bpf_scx_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
 			       const struct btf_member *member,
 			       void *kdata, const void *udata)
@@ -7376,7 +7396,7 @@ static struct sched_ext_ops_cid __bpf_ops_sched_ext_ops_cid = {
  * verified to match by the BUILD_BUG_ON checks in scx_init().
  */
 static struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_sched_ext_ops_cid = {
-	.verifier_ops = &bpf_scx_verifier_ops,
+	.verifier_ops = &bpf_scx_cid_verifier_ops,
 	.reg = bpf_scx_reg_cid,
 	.unreg = bpf_scx_unreg,
 	.check_member = bpf_scx_check_member,
-- 
2.54.0