From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 20/32] sched_ext: Generalize local-DSQ handling to rq-owned DSQs
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 22:01:47 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703080159.2314350-21-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703080159.2314350-1-tj@kernel.org>
The local DSQ is synchronized by the containing rq lock rather than its own
dsq->lock. A later patch adds a second such DSQ. In preparation, factor the
"rq owns the lock" test into dsq_is_rq_owned() and rename
local_dsq_post_enq() to rq_owned_post_enq(), taking @rq explicitly.
No behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/ext/ext.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
index 4f0d72658fd8..7d8846cea425 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
@@ -96,6 +96,17 @@ static atomic_long_t scx_hotplug_seq = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0);
/* Global cursor for the per-CPU tid allocator. Starts at 1; tid 0 is reserved. */
static atomic64_t scx_tid_cursor = ATOMIC64_INIT(1);
+/* is @dsq synchronized by the containing rq lock instead of dsq->lock? */
+static bool dsq_is_rq_owned(struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq)
+{
+ switch (dsq->id) {
+ case SCX_DSQ_LOCAL:
+ return true;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_EXT_SUB_SCHED
/*
* The sub sched being enabled. Used by scx_disable_and_exit_task() to exit
@@ -1263,11 +1274,10 @@ static void call_task_dequeue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
p->scx.flags &= ~SCX_TASK_IN_CUSTODY;
}
-static void local_dsq_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq,
- struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
+static void rq_owned_post_enq(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
+ struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p,
+ u64 enq_flags)
{
- struct rq *rq = container_of(dsq, struct rq, scx.local_dsq);
-
call_task_dequeue(sch, rq, p, 0);
/*
@@ -1327,13 +1337,13 @@ static void scx_dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq, struct task_struct *p,
u64 enq_flags)
{
- bool is_local = dsq->id == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL;
+ bool is_rq_owned = dsq_is_rq_owned(dsq);
WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.dsq || !list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node));
WARN_ON_ONCE((p->scx.dsq_flags & SCX_TASK_DSQ_ON_PRIQ) ||
!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->scx.dsq_priq));
- if (!is_local) {
+ if (!is_rq_owned) {
raw_spin_lock_nested(&dsq->lock,
(enq_flags & SCX_ENQ_NESTED) ? SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING : 0);
@@ -1428,8 +1438,8 @@ static void scx_dispatch_enqueue(struct scx_sched *sch, struct rq *rq,
* ops_state first, both sides would modify p->scx.flags
* concurrently in a non-atomic way.
*/
- if (is_local) {
- local_dsq_post_enq(sch, dsq, p, enq_flags);
+ if (is_rq_owned) {
+ rq_owned_post_enq(sch, rq, dsq, p, enq_flags);
} else {
/*
* Task on global/bypass DSQ: leave custody, task on
@@ -1476,7 +1486,7 @@ static void task_unlink_from_dsq(struct task_struct *p,
static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
struct scx_dispatch_q *dsq = p->scx.dsq;
- bool is_local = dsq == &rq->scx.local_dsq;
+ bool is_rq_owned = dsq && dsq_is_rq_owned(dsq);
lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
@@ -1500,7 +1510,7 @@ static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
return;
}
- if (!is_local)
+ if (!is_rq_owned)
raw_spin_lock(&dsq->lock);
/*
@@ -1522,7 +1532,7 @@ static void scx_dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
}
p->scx.dsq = NULL;
- if (!is_local)
+ if (!is_rq_owned)
raw_spin_unlock(&dsq->lock);
}
@@ -2074,7 +2084,7 @@ static void move_local_task_to_local_dsq(struct scx_sched *sch,
dsq_inc_nr(dst_dsq, p, enq_flags);
p->scx.dsq = dst_dsq;
- local_dsq_post_enq(sch, dst_dsq, p, enq_flags);
+ rq_owned_post_enq(sch, dst_rq, dst_dsq, p, enq_flags);
}
/**
--
2.54.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-03 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 8:01 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Capability-based CPU delegation for sub-schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 01/32] sched_ext: Fix premature ops->priv publication in scx_alloc_and_add_sched() Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 02/32] tools/sched_ext: scx - Fix cmask_subset(), cmask_equal() and cmask_weight() Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 03/32] sched_ext: Use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE in cmask word ops and drop _RACY variants Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 04/32] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap - Use bare u64/u32/s32 integer types Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 05/32] sched_ext: Reject direct slice and dsq_vtime writes for cid-form schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 06/32] sched_ext: Make scx_bpf_kick_cid() return void Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 07/32] sched_ext: Make the kick machinery per-sched Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 9:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 08/32] sched_ext: Add ops.init_cids() to finalize the cid layout before init Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 09/32] sched_ext: Add CID sharding Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 10/32] sched_ext: Add shard boundaries to scx_bpf_cid_override() Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 9:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 11/32] sched_ext: Defer scx_sched kobj sysfs add into the enable workfns Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 12/32] sched_ext: Add per-shard scx_sched storage scaffolding Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 13/32] sched_ext: Add scx_cmask_ref for validated arena cmask access Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 14/32] sched_ext: RCU-protect the sub-sched tree's children/sibling lists Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 10:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 15/32] sched_ext: Add scx_skip_subtree_pre() Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 16/32] sched_ext: Add per-shard cap delegation for sub-schedulers Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 11:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 17/32] sched_ext: Add coalescing sub_caps_updated() notifier " Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 18/32] sched_ext: Maintain per-cpu effective cap copies for single-read checks Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 12:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 19/32] sched_ext: Add sub_ecaps_updated() effective-cap change notifier Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 21/32] sched_ext: Add reject DSQ for cap-rejected dispatches Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 12:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 22/32] sched_ext: Add the SCX_CAP_ENQ_IMMED cap Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 23/32] sched_ext: Assign a unique id to each scheduler instance Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 24/32] sched_ext: Route task slice writes through set_task_slice() Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 25/32] sched_ext: Tie cpu occupancy to SCX_CAP_BASE through the task slice Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 13:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 26/32] sched_ext: Add the SCX_CAP_ENQ cap Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 27/32] sched_ext: Gate kicks on SCX_CAP_BASE and preemption on SCX_CAP_PREEMPT Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 14:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 28/32] sched_ext: Route ops.update_idle() to sub-schedulers and re-notify owed scheds Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 14:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 29/32] sched_ext: Replay ecaps notifications suppressed by bypass Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 30/32] sched_ext: Add scx_bpf_sub_kill() to evict a child sub-scheduler Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 31/32] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap - Expand hierarchical sub-scheduling Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 14:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 0:54 ` Tejun Heo
2026-07-03 8:01 ` [PATCH sched_ext/for-7.3 32/32] tools/sched_ext: scx_qmap - Add sub-sched cap fault injection Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260703080159.2314350-21-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox