Sched_ext development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Decay positive lag of sleeping entities
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 15:43:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-201722@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106151947.3991524-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] sched/eevdf: decay_entity_lag() uses stale PELT loads and
  h_load
- [Medium] sched/eevdf: decay_entity_lag() uses zero or cross-CPU
  exec_start
--

commit af61170f82add576c62982c6213d87ccfac0159f
Author: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

sched/eevdf: Decay positive lag of sleeping entities

This commit introduces decay_entity_lag() and calls it from
enqueue_task_fair() on wakeup to decay the positive virtual lag of sleeping
tasks based on their sleep duration and weight share on the previous
runqueue.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 0feec172fd37e..5cd171f830d86 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -897,6 +897,91 @@ bool update_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
>  	return avruntime - vlag != se->vruntime;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Signed add and clamp on underflow.
> + *
> + * Explicitly do a load-store to ensure the intermediate value never hits
> + * memory. This allows lockless observations without ever seeing the negative
> + * values.
> + */
> +#define add_positive(_ptr, _val) do {                           \
> +	typeof(_ptr) ptr = (_ptr);                              \
> +	__signed_scalar_typeof(*ptr) val = (_val);              \
> +	typeof(*ptr) res, var = READ_ONCE(*ptr);                \
> +								\
> +	res = var + val;                                        \
> +								\
> +	if (val < 0 && res > var)                               \
> +		res = 0;                                        \
> +								\
> +	WRITE_ONCE(*ptr, res);                                  \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +/*
> + * Remove and clamp on negative, from a local variable.
> + *
> + * A variant of sub_positive(), which does not use explicit load-store
> + * and is thus optimized for local variable updates.
> + */
> +#define lsub_positive(_ptr, _val) do {				\
> +	typeof(_ptr) ptr = (_ptr);				\
> +	*ptr -= min_t(typeof(*ptr), *ptr, _val);		\
> +} while (0)
> +
> +static inline unsigned long cfs_rq_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
> +static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p);
> +
> +static __always_inline
> +void decay_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> +{
> +	struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
> +	s64 delta_exec, vlag = se->vlag;
> +	unsigned long cfs_load;
> +	struct rq *rq;
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(se->on_rq);
> +
> +	/* Negative lag is managed by delayed dequeue path */
> +	if (vlag <= 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> +
> +	/* No fast access to prev rq task clock */
> +	if (flags & ENQUEUE_MIGRATED)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* Compute sleep time */
> +	delta_exec = rq_clock_task(rq) - se->exec_start;

[Severity: Medium]
Can se->exec_start be zero or hold another CPU's task clock here even when
ENQUEUE_MIGRATED is not set?

When a task is migrated (for instance via proxy_migrate_task() or as a
sched_delayed task), enqueue_entity() clears se->exec_start to 0.  If that
task is then dequeued before being picked to run (such as by
proxy_needs_return() in ttwu_runnable(), or when pick_next_entity() finishes
the delayed dequeue) and wakes on the same CPU, ENQUEUE_MIGRATED is not set,
so rq_clock_task(rq) - se->exec_start equals the full CPU task clock since
boot and zeroes se->vlag.

Similarly, under CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH, if a throttled task is migrated onto a
destination cfs_rq that is also throttled, enqueue_task_fair() returns early
via enqueue_throttled_task(p) before enqueue_entity() can clear
se->exec_start, and tg_unthrottle_up() later calls enqueue_task_fair(rq, p,
ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) without ENQUEUE_MIGRATED.  decay_entity_lag() then subtracts
the previous CPU's se->exec_start from the new CPU's rq_clock_task(rq) and
subtracts an unattached task_h_load(p) from cfs_load.

> +	if (unlikely(delta_exec <= 0))
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* For anything above ~4 seconds, save computation and clear the lag */
> +	if (unlikely(delta_exec >> 32)) {
> +		se->vlag = 0;
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use cfs' load and p's weight to estimate what would have been the
> +	 * share for p. task's load contribution to cfs' load is replaced by
> +	 * its weight.
> +	 */
> +	cfs_load = cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq);
> +	lsub_positive(&cfs_load, task_h_load(p));
> +	if (cfs_load) {
> +		unsigned long weight = scale_load_down(se->h_load.weight);
> +
> +		delta_exec *= weight;
> +		delta_exec = div64_long(delta_exec, cfs_load + weight);
> +	}
> +
> +	vlag -= calc_delta_fair(delta_exec, se);
> +
> +	/* vlag can't become neg while sleeping */
> +	se->vlag = max(0, vlag);
> +}

[ ... ]

> @@ -8185,6 +8238,9 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
>  	if (p->in_iowait)
>  		cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_IOWAIT);
>  
> +	if (task_wake)
> +		decay_entity_lag(cfs_rq, p, flags);

[Severity: Medium]
Does calling decay_entity_lag() before enqueue_hierarchy() and
reweight_eevdf() use stale PELT load averages and a stale se->h_load.weight?

When p wakes on its previous CPU without sync_entity_load_avg() having run
(for example via the select_idle_sibling() fast path), p->se.avg.load_avg is
still at its pre-sleep value because update_load_avg() is only called inside
enqueue_hierarchy() -> enqueue_entity().  Meanwhile, if other tasks ran on rq
while p slept, p's blocked load contribution inside cfs_rq->avg.load_avg has
already decayed; subtracting the undecayed task_h_load(p) from the decayed
cfs_rq_load_avg(cfs_rq) eats into the active load of the other tasks (often
clamping cfs_load to 0) and over-decays p->se.vlag as if the CPU had been
idle.

Under CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED, calling task_h_load(p) before
enqueue_hierarchy() also invokes update_cfs_rq_h_load() on unsynchronized
group PELT averages and caches that stale cfs_rq->h_load for the rest of the
current jiffy.  In addition, if p was reniced or had its group shares changed
while sleeping, reweight_task_fair() returned early while !se->on_rq, so
se->h_load.weight is not updated until enqueue_hierarchy() and
reweight_eevdf() run below.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106151947.3991524-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-06 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-06 15:19 [PATCH 00/18 v3] Improving latency of short slice tasks Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 01/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Decay positive lag of sleeping entities Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:43   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 02/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag at wakeup when prev CPU has been idle Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:22   ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-09 15:27     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 15:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 16:27         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-11  9:03           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-12  7:02             ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-11 10:04   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-11-12  7:33     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 03/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag at wakeup when migrating and prev " Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 18:05   ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 04/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag when waking up on idle cpu Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 18:39   ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 05/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Add per cpu cached min_slice Vincent Guittot
2026-11-07  6:53   ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-09 15:27     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 06/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Add min slice check when selecting CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07  8:57   ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-09 13:55     ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 14:15       ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-09 15:37         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 15:34     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 15:55     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 19:56       ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-10 13:32         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 07/20 v3] sched/fair: Prepare select_task_rq_fair() to be called for new cases Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 08/20 v3] sched/fair: Add push task mechanism for fair Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 14:43   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 16:07     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-11  8:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-12  7:01         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 15:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 16:14     ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-11  9:01       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-12  7:01         ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-12  7:36           ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-12  9:49           ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-12 11:29             ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-12 12:19               ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 09/20 v3] sched/fair: Optimize " Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 10/20 v3] sched/core: Add rq flag to tick parameters Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 11/20 v3] sched/fair: Add force push task mechanism for fair Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 12/20 v3] sched/fair: Support not wakeup case in select_idle_sibling Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13  5:31   ` kernel test robot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 13/20] sched/eevdf: Try to push short slice task on a better CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 14/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Push short slice task that are not picked Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 15/20 v3] sched/fair: Enable push task for preempt short Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 16/20 v3] energy model: Add a get previous state function Vincent Guittot
2026-11-10 19:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 17/20 v3] sched/fair: Rework feec() to use cost instead of spare capacity Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 18/20 v3] energy model: Remove unused em_cpu_energy() Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 19/20 v3] sched/fair: Take into account slice in EAS Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 20/20 v3] sched/fair: Fix tasks stacking on same idle CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:53   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-201722@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox