From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/20 v3] sched/fair: Take into account slice in EAS
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 16:26:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-201803@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106151947.3991524-20-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] sched/fair: slice check on idle CPUs in update_best_cpu()
prefers SCHED_IDLE
--
commit 94c14b8b01a87751cdea1dbf5bbcde621aa150bb
Author: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
sched/fair: Take into account slice in EAS
This commit updates update_best_cpu() in Energy Aware Scheduling to compare
the waking task's slice against each candidate runqueue's min_slice when
energy costs are equal.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index ea117c3d0dd71..da9c4416f1b5c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9885,13 +9885,22 @@ static bool update_best_cpu(struct energy_cpu_stat *target,
> int prev, struct sched_domain *sd,
> struct task_struct *p)
> {
> + unsigned long task_slice = p->se.slice;
> bool target_idle = choose_idle_cpu(target->cpu, p);
> bool min_idle = choose_idle_cpu(min->cpu, p);
> + bool target_first, min_first;
>
> /* Select the one which is idle */
> if (target_idle != min_idle)
> return target_idle;
>
> + target_first = task_slice < get_rq_min_slice(cpu_rq(target->cpu));
> + min_first = task_slice < get_rq_min_slice(cpu_rq(min->cpu));
> +
> + /* Select the one where you can run first */
> + if (target_first != min_first)
> + return target_first;
[Severity: Medium]
Can this slice comparison prefer a CPU running SCHED_IDLE tasks over a
completely empty idle CPU when both target_idle and min_idle are true?
choose_idle_cpu() returns true both for an empty CPU (available_idle_cpu())
and for a CPU running only SCHED_IDLE tasks (choose_sched_idle_rq()). On
an empty runqueue, __update_rq_min_slice() resets rq->min_slice to 0, so
task_slice < get_rq_min_slice() is false. On a CPU with a queued
SCHED_IDLE task, rq->min_slice holds that task's slice, so task_slice <
get_rq_min_slice() is true whenever p->se.slice is shorter.
When both candidate CPUs pass choose_idle_cpu(), execution falls through
if (target_idle != min_idle) and returns at if (target_first != min_first),
selecting the SCHED_IDLE CPU over a completely idle CPU and bypassing the
prev_cpu and nr_running checks below. Should the slice check be skipped
when target_idle is true?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261106151947.3991524-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org?part=19
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 15:19 [PATCH 00/18 v3] Improving latency of short slice tasks Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 01/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Decay positive lag of sleeping entities Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 02/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag at wakeup when prev CPU has been idle Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:22 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-09 15:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 16:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-11 9:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-12 7:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-11 10:04 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-11-12 7:33 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 03/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag at wakeup when migrating and prev " Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 18:05 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 04/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Reset lag when waking up on idle cpu Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 18:39 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 05/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Add per cpu cached min_slice Vincent Guittot
2026-11-07 6:53 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-09 15:27 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 06/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Add min slice check when selecting CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 8:57 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-09 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 14:15 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-09 15:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 15:34 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 15:55 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 19:56 ` Kayra Cizmeci
2026-11-10 13:32 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 07/20 v3] sched/fair: Prepare select_task_rq_fair() to be called for new cases Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 08/20 v3] sched/fair: Add push task mechanism for fair Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-09 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 16:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-11 8:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-12 7:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-09 15:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-09 16:14 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-11 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-12 7:01 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-12 7:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-12 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-12 11:29 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-11-12 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 09/20 v3] sched/fair: Optimize " Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 10/20 v3] sched/core: Add rq flag to tick parameters Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 11/20 v3] sched/fair: Add force push task mechanism for fair Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 12/20 v3] sched/fair: Support not wakeup case in select_idle_sibling Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 5:31 ` kernel test robot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 13/20] sched/eevdf: Try to push short slice task on a better CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 14/20 v3] sched/eevdf: Push short slice task that are not picked Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 15/20 v3] sched/fair: Enable push task for preempt short Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 16/20 v3] energy model: Add a get previous state function Vincent Guittot
2026-11-10 19:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 17/20 v3] sched/fair: Rework feec() to use cost instead of spare capacity Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 18/20 v3] energy model: Remove unused em_cpu_energy() Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 19/20 v3] sched/fair: Take into account slice in EAS Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-06 15:19 ` [PATCH 20/20 v3] sched/fair: Fix tasks stacking on same idle CPU Vincent Guittot
2026-11-06 16:53 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-201803@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox