SPARC and UltraSPARC platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Andreas Larsson" <andreas@gaisler.com>,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Use $(kecho) to announce kernel images being ready
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 21:26:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231205202630.GA290248@ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231205180506.GA242352@ravnborg.org>

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 07:05:06PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Arnd.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 02:06:02PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > I would also
> > suggest raising the minimum SPARC32 level to that of
> > leon3 (SPARCv8e with CAS), which is what glibc requires
> > anyway for futex().
> 
> Agreed, it is long time since I got any indications that people
> actually use these old machines.
> The sparc32 machines I have, have not been powered up for several years
> now, and they were only used to test new kernels on anyway.
> 
> I sent out a small patch series to do more or less what you suggested
> maybe one year ago. Back then the resistance was only from nostalgic
> people (like myself) and no real users.
> 
> If you or anyone moves forward removing the non-leon sparc32 support
> then starting new would be the best approach, I do not think it makes
> sense to dig up my old patch set.

Never mind, I digged up the old patchset and will try to prepare
something. Then we will see what reception the patch set receives this
time.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-05 20:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-13  7:52 [PATCH] sparc: Use $(kecho) to announce kernel images being ready Uwe Kleine-König
2023-07-13 14:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2023-12-04 11:05   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2023-12-04 11:14     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-12-04 13:06     ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-04 13:37       ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-12-04 14:13         ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-05 18:05       ` Sam Ravnborg
2023-12-05 20:26         ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2023-12-06  9:31           ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-12-07 16:49             ` Andreas Larsson
2023-12-18 20:52               ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-12-18 21:02                 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-12-19 10:32                   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231205202630.GA290248@ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox