* [SPDK] Isolation for applications
@ 2017-02-10 13:53 Pramod Bhatotia
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pramod Bhatotia @ 2017-02-10 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: spdk
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 219 bytes --]
Hi everyone,
How could we support an isolation mechanism for competing applications for
the userspace NVMe over Intel SPDK?
Also, is there a file-system/OS support to enforce such isolation?
Thanks,
-Pramod
[-- Attachment #2: attachment.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 302 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [SPDK] Isolation for applications
@ 2017-02-10 15:11 Harris, James R
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Harris, James R @ 2017-02-10 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: spdk
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1890 bytes --]
Hi Pramod,
There are a few projects in progress within our team here at Intel to work towards this kind of isolation.
First – we are developing a userspace SPDK vhost-scsi target, which can serve SPDK block storage into virtual machines. This depends on some changes needed in QEMU to support userspace vhost-scsi targets. VMs use the standard virtio-scsi driver to communicate with the SPDK vhost-scsi target. The SPDK vhost-scsi target ensures each VM can only access the block storage it has been allocated. Host processes could theoretically use a similar mechanism, but would need a userspace SPDK virtio-scsi driver (similar to the DPDK rte_virtio userspace driver for networking). Our team is not currently focusing on an SPDK virtio-scsi driver, but would be happy to accept patches which would add one.
Second – we are developing a lightweight filesystem/block allocator called Blobstore. This can be used to dynamically partition block devices. In this model, you could create large “blobs” on an NVMe devices, and assign different blobs to different VMs or host processes.
Long-term, as NVMe devices start to support SR-IOV, you will be able to isolate by allocate capacity to a namespace, assign that namespace to a VF, and then run your SPDK application against that VF.
Hope this answers your questions…
-Jim
From: SPDK <spdk-bounces(a)lists.01.org> on behalf of Pramod Bhatotia <pramod.bhatotia(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk(a)lists.01.org>
Date: Friday, February 10, 2017 at 6:53 AM
To: "SPDK(a)lists.01.org" <SPDK(a)lists.01.org>
Subject: [SPDK] Isolation for applications
Hi everyone,
How could we support an isolation mechanism for competing applications for the userspace NVMe over Intel SPDK?
Also, is there a file-system/OS support to enforce such isolation?
Thanks,
-Pramod
[-- Attachment #2: attachment.html --]
[-- Type: text/html, Size: 5938 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-10 15:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-10 15:11 [SPDK] Isolation for applications Harris, James R
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-02-10 13:53 Pramod Bhatotia
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox