From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
To: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>, <matanb@mellanox.com>,
<leon@leon.nu>, <sagi@grimberg.me>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/core: Fix different types mix in ib_device_cap_flags structure values
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 08:35:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08df9022-e575-da0d-c76d-a28185c9db2d@sandisk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464602994-21226-1-git-send-email-maxg@mellanox.com>
On 05/30/16 03:09, Max Gurtovoy wrote:
> ib_device_cap_flags 64-bit expansion caused a possible caps overlapping
> (depending on machine endianness) and made consumers read wrong device
> capabilities. For example IB_DEVICE_SG_GAPS_REG was falsely read by the
> iser driver causing it to use a non-existing capability. Fix this by
> casting ib_device_cap_flags enumerations to ULL.
>
> [ ... ]
> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
> [ ... ]
> enum ib_device_cap_flags {
> [ ... ]
> IB_DEVICE_SG_GAPS_REG = (1ULL << 32),
> [ ... ]
> };
How can this patch make a difference? The presence of any constant in an
enum that does not fit in a 32-bit integer makes an enum 64 bits wide.
In other words, all the changes from "1" into "1ULL" in this patch do
not have any effect. From the C standard: "Each enumerated type shall be
compatible with char, a signed integer type, or an unsigned integer
type. The choice of type is implementation-defined but shall be capable
of representing the values of all the members of the enumeration. [...]
An implementation may delay the choice of which integer type until all
enumeration constants have been seen."
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-31 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-30 10:09 [PATCH] IB/core: Fix different types mix in ib_device_cap_flags structure values Max Gurtovoy
2016-05-31 15:35 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2016-05-31 17:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-05-31 17:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-05-31 18:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-31 18:12 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-05-31 18:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-05-31 18:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-05-31 19:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-06-01 12:04 ` Max Gurtovoy
2016-06-01 15:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-05-31 18:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-31 18:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2016-05-31 15:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2016-05-31 19:14 ` Max Gurtovoy
2016-05-31 19:16 ` Robert LeBlanc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08df9022-e575-da0d-c76d-a28185c9db2d@sandisk.com \
--to=bart.vanassche@sandisk.com \
--cc=leon@leon.nu \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matanb@mellanox.com \
--cc=maxg@mellanox.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox