[PATCH 6.1 0/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[PATCH 6.1 0/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Alexey Panov]

Commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted
images properly") fixes CVE-2024-47736 [1] but brings another problem [2].
So commit 1a2180f6859c ("erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting") should be
backported too.

[1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47736
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKPOu+8tvSowiJADW2RuKyofL_CSkm_SuyZA7ME5vMLWmL6pqw@mail.gmail.com/

Gao Xiang (2):
  erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly
  erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting

 fs/erofs/zdata.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.5

[PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Alexey Panov]

From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

commit 9e2f9d34dd12e6e5b244ec488bcebd0c2d566c50 upstream.

syzbot reported a task hang issue due to a deadlock case where it is
waiting for the folio lock of a cached folio that will be used for
cache I/Os.

After looking into the crafted fuzzed image, I found it's formed with
several overlapped big pclusters as below:

 Ext:   logical offset   |  length :     physical offset    |  length
   0:        0..   16384 |   16384 :     151552..    167936 |   16384
   1:    16384..   32768 |   16384 :     155648..    172032 |   16384
   2:    32768..   49152 |   16384 :  537223168.. 537239552 |   16384
...

Here, extent 0/1 are physically overlapped although it's entirely
_impossible_ for normal filesystem images generated by mkfs.

First, managed folios containing compressed data will be marked as
up-to-date and then unlocked immediately (unlike in-place folios) when
compressed I/Os are complete.  If physical blocks are not submitted in
the incremental order, there should be separate BIOs to avoid dependency
issues.  However, the current code mis-arranges z_erofs_fill_bio_vec()
and BIO submission which causes unexpected BIO waits.

Second, managed folios will be connected to their own pclusters for
efficient inter-queries.  However, this is somewhat hard to implement
easily if overlapped big pclusters exist.  Again, these only appear in
fuzzed images so let's simply fall back to temporary short-lived pages
for correctness.

Additionally, it justifies that referenced managed folios cannot be
truncated for now and reverts part of commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy
up `struct z_erofs_bvec`") for simplicity although it shouldn't be any
difference.

Reported-by: syzbot+4fc98ed414ae63d1ada2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+de04e06b28cfecf2281c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+c8c8238b394be4a1087d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+4fc98ed414ae63d1ada2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0000000000002fda01061e334873@google.com
Fixes: 8e6c8fa9f2e9 ("erofs: enable big pcluster feature")
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240910070847.3356592-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
[Alexey: minor fix to resolve merge conflict]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Panov <apanov@astralinux.ru>
---
Backport fix for CVE-2024-47736

 fs/erofs/zdata.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
index 94e9e0bf3bbd..ac01c0ede7f7 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
@@ -1346,14 +1346,13 @@ static struct page *pickup_page_for_submission(struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl,
 		goto out;
 
 	lock_page(page);
-
-	/* only true if page reclaim goes wrong, should never happen */
-	DBG_BUGON(justfound && PagePrivate(page));
-
-	/* the page is still in manage cache */
-	if (page->mapping == mc) {
+	if (likely(page->mapping == mc)) {
 		WRITE_ONCE(pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page, page);
 
+		/*
+		 * The cached folio is still in managed cache but without
+		 * a valid `->private` pcluster hint.  Let's reconnect them.
+		 */
 		if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
 			/*
 			 * impossible to be !PagePrivate(page) for
@@ -1367,22 +1366,24 @@ static struct page *pickup_page_for_submission(struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl,
 			SetPagePrivate(page);
 		}
 
-		/* no need to submit io if it is already up-to-date */
-		if (PageUptodate(page)) {
-			unlock_page(page);
-			page = NULL;
+		if (likely(page->private == (unsigned long)pcl)) {
+			/* don't submit cache I/Os again if already uptodate */
+			if (PageUptodate(page)) {
+				unlock_page(page);
+				page = NULL;
+
+			}
+			goto out;
 		}
-		goto out;
+		/*
+		 * Already linked with another pcluster, which only appears in
+		 * crafted images by fuzzers for now.  But handle this anyway.
+		 */
+		tocache = false;	/* use temporary short-lived pages */
+	} else {
+		DBG_BUGON(1); /* referenced managed folios can't be truncated */
+		tocache = true;
 	}
-
-	/*
-	 * the managed page has been truncated, it's unsafe to
-	 * reuse this one, let's allocate a new cache-managed page.
-	 */
-	DBG_BUGON(page->mapping);
-	DBG_BUGON(!justfound);
-
-	tocache = true;
 	unlock_page(page);
 	put_page(page);
 out_allocpage:
@@ -1536,16 +1537,11 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
 		end = cur + pcl->pclusterpages;
 
 		do {
-			struct page *page;
-
-			page = pickup_page_for_submission(pcl, i++, pagepool,
-							  mc);
-			if (!page)
-				continue;
+			struct page *page = NULL;
 
 			if (bio && (cur != last_index + 1 ||
 				    last_bdev != mdev.m_bdev)) {
-submit_bio_retry:
+drain_io:
 				submit_bio(bio);
 				if (memstall) {
 					psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
@@ -1554,6 +1550,13 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
 				bio = NULL;
 			}
 
+			if (!page) {
+				page = pickup_page_for_submission(pcl, i++,
+						pagepool, mc);
+				if (!page)
+					continue;
+			}
+
 			if (unlikely(PageWorkingset(page)) && !memstall) {
 				psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
 				memstall = 1;
@@ -1574,7 +1577,7 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
 			}
 
 			if (bio_add_page(bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0) < PAGE_SIZE)
-				goto submit_bio_retry;
+				goto drain_io;
 
 			last_index = cur;
 			bypass = false;
-- 
2.39.5

Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Sasha Levin]

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

Summary of potential issues:
⚠️ Found follow-up fixes in mainline

The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 9e2f9d34dd12e6e5b244ec488bcebd0c2d566c50

WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Alexey Panov<apanov@astralinux.ru>
Commit author: Gao Xiang<hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Status in newer kernel trees:
6.13.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.12.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 1bf7e414cac3)

Found fixes commits:
1a2180f6859c erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1:  9e2f9d34dd12e < -:  ------------- erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly
-:  ------------- > 1:  8b40df2f9aa65 erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly
---

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.1.y        |  Success    |  Success   |

Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Fedor Pchelkin]

On Fri, 28. Feb 19:51, Alexey Panov wrote:
> From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> commit 9e2f9d34dd12e6e5b244ec488bcebd0c2d566c50 upstream.
> 
> syzbot reported a task hang issue due to a deadlock case where it is
> waiting for the folio lock of a cached folio that will be used for
> cache I/Os.
> 
> After looking into the crafted fuzzed image, I found it's formed with
> several overlapped big pclusters as below:
> 
>  Ext:   logical offset   |  length :     physical offset    |  length
>    0:        0..   16384 |   16384 :     151552..    167936 |   16384
>    1:    16384..   32768 |   16384 :     155648..    172032 |   16384
>    2:    32768..   49152 |   16384 :  537223168.. 537239552 |   16384
> ...
> 
> Here, extent 0/1 are physically overlapped although it's entirely
> _impossible_ for normal filesystem images generated by mkfs.
> 
> First, managed folios containing compressed data will be marked as
> up-to-date and then unlocked immediately (unlike in-place folios) when
> compressed I/Os are complete.  If physical blocks are not submitted in
> the incremental order, there should be separate BIOs to avoid dependency
> issues.  However, the current code mis-arranges z_erofs_fill_bio_vec()
> and BIO submission which causes unexpected BIO waits.
> 
> Second, managed folios will be connected to their own pclusters for
> efficient inter-queries.  However, this is somewhat hard to implement
> easily if overlapped big pclusters exist.  Again, these only appear in
> fuzzed images so let's simply fall back to temporary short-lived pages
> for correctness.
> 
> Additionally, it justifies that referenced managed folios cannot be
> truncated for now and reverts part of commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy
> up `struct z_erofs_bvec`") for simplicity although it shouldn't be any
> difference.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+4fc98ed414ae63d1ada2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+de04e06b28cfecf2281c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: syzbot+c8c8238b394be4a1087d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Tested-by: syzbot+4fc98ed414ae63d1ada2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0000000000002fda01061e334873@google.com
> Fixes: 8e6c8fa9f2e9 ("erofs: enable big pcluster feature")
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240910070847.3356592-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
> [Alexey: minor fix to resolve merge conflict]

Urgh, it doesn't look so minor indeed. Backward struct folio -> struct
page conversions can be tricky sometimes. Please see several comments
below.

> Signed-off-by: Alexey Panov <apanov@astralinux.ru>
> ---
> Backport fix for CVE-2024-47736
> 
>  fs/erofs/zdata.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> index 94e9e0bf3bbd..ac01c0ede7f7 100644

I'm looking at the diff of upstream commit and the first thing it does
is to remove zeroing out the folio/page private field here:

  // upstream commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly")
  @@ -1450,7 +1451,6 @@ static void z_erofs_fill_bio_vec(struct bio_vec *bvec,
           * file-backed folios will be used instead.
           */
          if (folio->private == (void *)Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE) {
  -               folio->private = 0;
                  tocache = true;
                  goto out_tocache;
          }

while in 6.1.129 the corresponding fragment seems untouched with the
backport patch. Is it intended?

> --- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> @@ -1346,14 +1346,13 @@ static struct page *pickup_page_for_submission(struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl,
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	lock_page(page);
> -
> -	/* only true if page reclaim goes wrong, should never happen */
> -	DBG_BUGON(justfound && PagePrivate(page));
> -
> -	/* the page is still in manage cache */
> -	if (page->mapping == mc) {
> +	if (likely(page->mapping == mc)) {
>  		WRITE_ONCE(pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page, page);
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * The cached folio is still in managed cache but without

Are the comments worth to be adapted as well? I don't think the "folio"
stuff would be useful while reading 6.1 source code.

> +		 * a valid `->private` pcluster hint.  Let's reconnect them.
> +		 */
>  		if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
>  			/*
>  			 * impossible to be !PagePrivate(page) for
> @@ -1367,22 +1366,24 @@ static struct page *pickup_page_for_submission(struct z_erofs_pcluster *pcl,
>  			SetPagePrivate(page);
>  		}
>  
> -		/* no need to submit io if it is already up-to-date */
> -		if (PageUptodate(page)) {
> -			unlock_page(page);
> -			page = NULL;
> +		if (likely(page->private == (unsigned long)pcl)) {
> +			/* don't submit cache I/Os again if already uptodate */
> +			if (PageUptodate(page)) {
> +				unlock_page(page);
> +				page = NULL;
> +
> +			}
> +			goto out;
>  		}
> -		goto out;
> +		/*
> +		 * Already linked with another pcluster, which only appears in
> +		 * crafted images by fuzzers for now.  But handle this anyway.
> +		 */
> +		tocache = false;	/* use temporary short-lived pages */
> +	} else {
> +		DBG_BUGON(1); /* referenced managed folios can't be truncated */
> +		tocache = true;
>  	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * the managed page has been truncated, it's unsafe to
> -	 * reuse this one, let's allocate a new cache-managed page.
> -	 */
> -	DBG_BUGON(page->mapping);
> -	DBG_BUGON(!justfound);
> -
> -	tocache = true;
>  	unlock_page(page);
>  	put_page(page);
>  out_allocpage:

There is a whole bunch of out path handling changes done for this function
in upstream commit, like

  // upstream commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly")
   out_allocfolio:
  -       zbv.page = erofs_allocpage(&f->pagepool, gfp | __GFP_NOFAIL);
  +       page = erofs_allocpage(&f->pagepool, gfp | __GFP_NOFAIL);
          spin_lock(&pcl->obj.lockref.lock);
  -       if (pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page) {
  -               erofs_pagepool_add(&f->pagepool, zbv.page);
  +       if (unlikely(pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page != zbv.page)) {
  +               erofs_pagepool_add(&f->pagepool, page);
                  spin_unlock(&pcl->obj.lockref.lock);
                  cond_resched();
                  goto repeat;
          }
  -       bvec->bv_page = pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page = zbv.page;
  -       folio = page_folio(zbv.page);
  -       /* first mark it as a temporary shortlived folio (now 1 ref) */
  -       folio->private = (void *)Z_EROFS_SHORTLIVED_PAGE;
  +       bvec->bv_page = pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page = page;
  +       folio = page_folio(page);
          spin_unlock(&pcl->obj.lockref.lock);
   out_tocache:
          if (!tocache || bs != PAGE_SIZE ||
  -           filemap_add_folio(mc, folio, pcl->obj.index + nr, gfp))
  +           filemap_add_folio(mc, folio, pcl->obj.index + nr, gfp)) {
  +               /* turn into a temporary shortlived folio (1 ref) */
  +               folio->private = (void *)Z_EROFS_SHORTLIVED_PAGE;
                  return;
  +       }
          folio_attach_private(folio, pcl);
          /* drop a refcount added by allocpage (then 2 refs in total here) */
          folio_put(folio);


These changes are probably not relevant for the 6.1.y but this fact is
still usually worth a brief mentioning in the backporter's comment.


> @@ -1536,16 +1537,11 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
>  		end = cur + pcl->pclusterpages;
>  
>  		do {
> -			struct page *page;
> -
> -			page = pickup_page_for_submission(pcl, i++, pagepool,
> -							  mc);
> -			if (!page)
> -				continue;
> +			struct page *page = NULL;
>  
>  			if (bio && (cur != last_index + 1 ||
>  				    last_bdev != mdev.m_bdev)) {
> -submit_bio_retry:
> +drain_io:
>  				submit_bio(bio);
>  				if (memstall) {
>  					psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
> @@ -1554,6 +1550,13 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
>  				bio = NULL;
>  			}
>  
> +			if (!page) {
> +				page = pickup_page_for_submission(pcl, i++,
> +						pagepool, mc);
> +				if (!page)
> +					continue;
> +			}
> +
>  			if (unlikely(PageWorkingset(page)) && !memstall) {
>  				psi_memstall_enter(&pflags);
>  				memstall = 1;
> @@ -1574,7 +1577,7 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
>  			}
>  
>  			if (bio_add_page(bio, page, PAGE_SIZE, 0) < PAGE_SIZE)
> -				goto submit_bio_retry;
> +				goto drain_io;
>  
>  			last_index = cur;
>  			bypass = false;
> -- 
> 2.39.5

Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Gao Xiang]

Hi Fedor,

On 2025/3/2 18:56, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> On Fri, 28. Feb 19:51, Alexey Panov wrote:
>> From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
>>
>> commit 9e2f9d34dd12e6e5b244ec488bcebd0c2d566c50 upstream.
>>
>> syzbot reported a task hang issue due to a deadlock case where it is
>> waiting for the folio lock of a cached folio that will be used for
>> cache I/Os.
>>
>> After looking into the crafted fuzzed image, I found it's formed with
>> several overlapped big pclusters as below:
>>
>>   Ext:   logical offset   |  length :     physical offset    |  length
>>     0:        0..   16384 |   16384 :     151552..    167936 |   16384
>>     1:    16384..   32768 |   16384 :     155648..    172032 |   16384
>>     2:    32768..   49152 |   16384 :  537223168.. 537239552 |   16384
>> ...
>>
>> Here, extent 0/1 are physically overlapped although it's entirely
>> _impossible_ for normal filesystem images generated by mkfs.
>>
>> First, managed folios containing compressed data will be marked as
>> up-to-date and then unlocked immediately (unlike in-place folios) when
>> compressed I/Os are complete.  If physical blocks are not submitted in
>> the incremental order, there should be separate BIOs to avoid dependency
>> issues.  However, the current code mis-arranges z_erofs_fill_bio_vec()
>> and BIO submission which causes unexpected BIO waits.
>>
>> Second, managed folios will be connected to their own pclusters for
>> efficient inter-queries.  However, this is somewhat hard to implement
>> easily if overlapped big pclusters exist.  Again, these only appear in
>> fuzzed images so let's simply fall back to temporary short-lived pages
>> for correctness.
>>
>> Additionally, it justifies that referenced managed folios cannot be
>> truncated for now and reverts part of commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy
>> up `struct z_erofs_bvec`") for simplicity although it shouldn't be any
>> difference.
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+4fc98ed414ae63d1ada2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Reported-by: syzbot+de04e06b28cfecf2281c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Reported-by: syzbot+c8c8238b394be4a1087d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Tested-by: syzbot+4fc98ed414ae63d1ada2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0000000000002fda01061e334873@google.com
>> Fixes: 8e6c8fa9f2e9 ("erofs: enable big pcluster feature")
>> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240910070847.3356592-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
>> [Alexey: minor fix to resolve merge conflict]
> 
> Urgh, it doesn't look so minor indeed. Backward struct folio -> struct
> page conversions can be tricky sometimes. Please see several comments
> below.

I manually backported it for Linux 6.6.y, see
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-6.6.y&id=1bf7e414cac303c9aec1be67872e19be8b64980c

Actually I had a very similiar backport for Linux 6.1.y,
but I forgot to send it out due to other ongoing stuffs.

I think this backport patch is all good, but you could
also mention it follows linux 6.6.y conflict changes
instead of "minor fix to resolve merge conflict".

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Panov <apanov@astralinux.ru>
>> ---
>> Backport fix for CVE-2024-47736
>>
>>   fs/erofs/zdata.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
>> index 94e9e0bf3bbd..ac01c0ede7f7 100644
> 
> I'm looking at the diff of upstream commit and the first thing it does
> is to remove zeroing out the folio/page private field here:
> 
>    // upstream commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly")
>    @@ -1450,7 +1451,6 @@ static void z_erofs_fill_bio_vec(struct bio_vec *bvec,
>             * file-backed folios will be used instead.
>             */
>            if (folio->private == (void *)Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE) {
>    -               folio->private = 0;
>                    tocache = true;
>                    goto out_tocache;
>            }
> 
> while in 6.1.129 the corresponding fragment seems untouched with the
> backport patch. Is it intended?

Yes, because it was added in
commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy up `struct z_erofs_bvec`")
and dropped again.

But for Linux 6.6.y and 6.1.y, we don't need to backport
2080ca1ed3e4.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Gao Xiang]

On 2025/3/3 01:41, Gao Xiang wrote:
> Hi Fedor,
> 
> On 2025/3/2 18:56, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
>> On Fri, 28. Feb 19:51, Alexey Panov wrote:
>>> From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
>>>
>>> commit 9e2f9d34dd12e6e5b244ec488bcebd0c2d566c50 upstream.
>>>
>>> syzbot reported a task hang issue due to a deadlock case where it is
>>> waiting for the folio lock of a cached folio that will be used for
>>> cache I/Os.
>>>
>>> After looking into the crafted fuzzed image, I found it's formed with
>>> several overlapped big pclusters as below:
>>>
>>>   Ext:   logical offset   |  length :     physical offset    |  length
>>>     0:        0..   16384 |   16384 :     151552..    167936 |   16384
>>>     1:    16384..   32768 |   16384 :     155648..    172032 |   16384
>>>     2:    32768..   49152 |   16384 :  537223168.. 537239552 |   16384
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Here, extent 0/1 are physically overlapped although it's entirely
>>> _impossible_ for normal filesystem images generated by mkfs.
>>>
>>> First, managed folios containing compressed data will be marked as
>>> up-to-date and then unlocked immediately (unlike in-place folios) when
>>> compressed I/Os are complete.  If physical blocks are not submitted in
>>> the incremental order, there should be separate BIOs to avoid dependency
>>> issues.  However, the current code mis-arranges z_erofs_fill_bio_vec()
>>> and BIO submission which causes unexpected BIO waits.
>>>
>>> Second, managed folios will be connected to their own pclusters for
>>> efficient inter-queries.  However, this is somewhat hard to implement
>>> easily if overlapped big pclusters exist.  Again, these only appear in
>>> fuzzed images so let's simply fall back to temporary short-lived pages
>>> for correctness.
>>>
>>> Additionally, it justifies that referenced managed folios cannot be
>>> truncated for now and reverts part of commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy
>>> up `struct z_erofs_bvec`") for simplicity although it shouldn't be any
>>> difference.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+4fc98ed414ae63d1ada2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+de04e06b28cfecf2281c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+c8c8238b394be4a1087d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Tested-by: syzbot+4fc98ed414ae63d1ada2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0000000000002fda01061e334873@google.com
>>> Fixes: 8e6c8fa9f2e9 ("erofs: enable big pcluster feature")
>>> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240910070847.3356592-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
>>> [Alexey: minor fix to resolve merge conflict]
>>
>> Urgh, it doesn't look so minor indeed. Backward struct folio -> struct
>> page conversions can be tricky sometimes. Please see several comments
>> below.
> 
> I manually backported it for Linux 6.6.y, see
> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=linux-6.6.y&id=1bf7e414cac303c9aec1be67872e19be8b64980c
> 
> Actually I had a very similiar backport for Linux 6.1.y,
> but I forgot to send it out due to other ongoing stuffs.
> 
> I think this backport patch is all good, but you could
> also mention it follows linux 6.6.y conflict changes
> instead of "minor fix to resolve merge conflict".
> 
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Panov <apanov@astralinux.ru>
>>> ---
>>> Backport fix for CVE-2024-47736
>>>
>>>   fs/erofs/zdata.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
>>> index 94e9e0bf3bbd..ac01c0ede7f7 100644
>>
>> I'm looking at the diff of upstream commit and the first thing it does
>> is to remove zeroing out the folio/page private field here:
>>
>>    // upstream commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly")
>>    @@ -1450,7 +1451,6 @@ static void z_erofs_fill_bio_vec(struct bio_vec *bvec,
>>             * file-backed folios will be used instead.
>>             */
>>            if (folio->private == (void *)Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE) {
>>    -               folio->private = 0;
>>                    tocache = true;
>>                    goto out_tocache;
>>            }
>>
>> while in 6.1.129 the corresponding fragment seems untouched with the
>> backport patch. Is it intended?
> 
> Yes, because it was added in
> commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy up `struct z_erofs_bvec`")
> and dropped again.
> 
> But for Linux 6.6.y and 6.1.y, we don't need to backport
> 2080ca1ed3e4.

Oh, it seems that I missed this part when backporting
for 6.6.y, but it has no actual difference because
`page->private` will be updated in `goto out_tocache`.

so `set_page_private(page, 0);` was actual a redundant
logic, you could follow the upstream to discard
`set_page_private(page, 0);`.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Fedor Pchelkin]

On Mon, 03. Mar 01:41, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
> > > index 94e9e0bf3bbd..ac01c0ede7f7 100644
> > 
> > I'm looking at the diff of upstream commit and the first thing it does
> > is to remove zeroing out the folio/page private field here:
> > 
> >    // upstream commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly")
> >    @@ -1450,7 +1451,6 @@ static void z_erofs_fill_bio_vec(struct bio_vec *bvec,
> >             * file-backed folios will be used instead.
> >             */
> >            if (folio->private == (void *)Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE) {
> >    -               folio->private = 0;
> >                    tocache = true;
> >                    goto out_tocache;
> >            }
> > 
> > while in 6.1.129 the corresponding fragment seems untouched with the
> > backport patch. Is it intended?
> 
> Yes, because it was added in
> commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy up `struct z_erofs_bvec`")
> and dropped again.
> 
> But for Linux 6.6.y and 6.1.y, we don't need to backport
> 2080ca1ed3e4.

Thanks for overall clarification, Gao!

My concern was that in 6.1 and 6.6 there is still a pattern at that
place, not directly related to 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy up
`struct z_erofs_bvec`"):

1. checking ->private against Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE
2. zeroing out ->private if the previous check holds true

// 6.1/6.6 fragment

	if (page->private == Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE) {
		WRITE_ONCE(pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page, page);
		set_page_private(page, 0);
		tocache = true;
		goto out_tocache;
	}

while the upstream patch changed the situation. If it's okay then no
remarks from me. Sorry for the noise..

Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Gao Xiang]

On 2025/3/3 02:13, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> On Mon, 03. Mar 01:41, Gao Xiang wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
>>>> index 94e9e0bf3bbd..ac01c0ede7f7 100644
>>>
>>> I'm looking at the diff of upstream commit and the first thing it does
>>> is to remove zeroing out the folio/page private field here:
>>>
>>>     // upstream commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly")
>>>     @@ -1450,7 +1451,6 @@ static void z_erofs_fill_bio_vec(struct bio_vec *bvec,
>>>              * file-backed folios will be used instead.
>>>              */
>>>             if (folio->private == (void *)Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE) {
>>>     -               folio->private = 0;
>>>                     tocache = true;
>>>                     goto out_tocache;
>>>             }
>>>
>>> while in 6.1.129 the corresponding fragment seems untouched with the
>>> backport patch. Is it intended?
>>
>> Yes, because it was added in
>> commit 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy up `struct z_erofs_bvec`")
>> and dropped again.
>>
>> But for Linux 6.6.y and 6.1.y, we don't need to backport
>> 2080ca1ed3e4.
> 
> Thanks for overall clarification, Gao!
> 
> My concern was that in 6.1 and 6.6 there is still a pattern at that
> place, not directly related to 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy up
> `struct z_erofs_bvec`"):
> 
> 1. checking ->private against Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE
> 2. zeroing out ->private if the previous check holds true
> 
> // 6.1/6.6 fragment
> 
> 	if (page->private == Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE) {
> 		WRITE_ONCE(pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page, page);
> 		set_page_private(page, 0);
> 		tocache = true;
> 		goto out_tocache;
> 	}
> 
> while the upstream patch changed the situation. If it's okay then no
> remarks from me. Sorry for the noise..

Yeah, yet as I mentioned `set_page_private(page, 0);`
seems redundant from the codebase, I'm fine with either
way.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Fedor Pchelkin]

On Mon, 03. Mar 08:31, Gao Xiang wrote:
> On 2025/3/3 02:13, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> > My concern was that in 6.1 and 6.6 there is still a pattern at that
> > place, not directly related to 2080ca1ed3e4 ("erofs: tidy up
> > `struct z_erofs_bvec`"):
> > 
> > 1. checking ->private against Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE
> > 2. zeroing out ->private if the previous check holds true
> > 
> > // 6.1/6.6 fragment
> > 
> > 	if (page->private == Z_EROFS_PREALLOCATED_PAGE) {
> > 		WRITE_ONCE(pcl->compressed_bvecs[nr].page, page);
> > 		set_page_private(page, 0);
> > 		tocache = true;
> > 		goto out_tocache;
> > 	}
> > 
> > while the upstream patch changed the situation. If it's okay then no
> > remarks from me. Sorry for the noise..
> 
> Yeah, yet as I mentioned `set_page_private(page, 0);`
> seems redundant from the codebase, I'm fine with either
> way.

Somehow I've written that mail without seeing your last reply there first.
Now everything is clear.

I'll kindly ask Alexey to send the v2 with minor adjustments to
generally non-minor merge conflict resolutions and the backporter's
comment though.

And again, thanks for clarifying all this.

Re: [PATCH 6.1 1/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Алексей Панов]

Hi Fedor and Gao!

Thanks for your efforts. I've sent out v2 of this patch with the
appropriate changes.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250304110558.8315-1-apanov@astralinux.ru/

[PATCH 6.1 2/2] erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting

[Alexey Panov]

From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

commit 1a2180f6859c73c674809f9f82e36c94084682ba upstream.

Max Kellermann recently reported psi_group_cpu.tasks[NR_MEMSTALL] is
incorrect in the 6.11.9 kernel.

The root cause appears to be that, since the problematic commit, bio
can be NULL, causing psi_memstall_leave() to be skipped in
z_erofs_submit_queue().

Reported-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAKPOu+8tvSowiJADW2RuKyofL_CSkm_SuyZA7ME5vMLWmL6pqw@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly")
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241127085236.3538334-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Alexey Panov <apanov@astralinux.ru>
---
 fs/erofs/zdata.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/zdata.c b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
index ac01c0ede7f7..d175b5d0a2f5 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/zdata.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/zdata.c
@@ -1589,11 +1589,10 @@ static void z_erofs_submit_queue(struct z_erofs_decompress_frontend *f,
 			move_to_bypass_jobqueue(pcl, qtail, owned_head);
 	} while (owned_head != Z_EROFS_PCLUSTER_TAIL);
 
-	if (bio) {
+	if (bio)
 		submit_bio(bio);
-		if (memstall)
-			psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
-	}
+	if (memstall)
+		psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
 
 	/*
 	 * although background is preferred, no one is pending for submission.
-- 
2.39.5

Re: [PATCH 6.1 2/2] erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting

[Sasha Levin]

[ Sasha's backport helper bot ]

Hi,

✅ All tests passed successfully. No issues detected.
No action required from the submitter.

The upstream commit SHA1 provided is correct: 1a2180f6859c73c674809f9f82e36c94084682ba

WARNING: Author mismatch between patch and upstream commit:
Backport author: Alexey Panov<apanov@astralinux.ru>
Commit author: Gao Xiang<hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Status in newer kernel trees:
6.13.y | Present (exact SHA1)
6.12.y | Present (different SHA1: 0653fa6ee045)
6.6.y | Present (different SHA1: 14f030a807dd)

Note: The patch differs from the upstream commit:
---
1:  1a2180f6859c7 < -:  ------------- erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting
-:  ------------- > 1:  63f49db1d3fb4 erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting
---

Results of testing on various branches:

| Branch                    | Patch Apply | Build Test |
|---------------------------|-------------|------------|
| stable/linux-6.1.y        |  Success    |  Success   |

Re: [PATCH 6.1 0/2] erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted images properly

[Gao Xiang]

On 2025/3/1 00:51, Alexey Panov wrote:
> Commit 9e2f9d34dd12 ("erofs: handle overlapped pclusters out of crafted
> images properly") fixes CVE-2024-47736 [1] but brings another problem [2].
> So commit 1a2180f6859c ("erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting") should be
> backported too.
> 
> [1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-47736
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAKPOu+8tvSowiJADW2RuKyofL_CSkm_SuyZA7ME5vMLWmL6pqw@mail.gmail.com/
> 

Thanks for your effort! Patches look good to me.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang