* Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] rtc: mt6397: fix alarm register overwrite
[not found] ` <CAGp9Lzq4D56PbivbHkQd41-TCoGACTiBqLz+Jyiqiog=YMvEbQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2019-03-14 2:46 ` mtk14576
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: mtk14576 @ 2019-03-14 2:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sean Wang
Cc: stable, Hsin-Hsiung Wang, Lee Jones, Rob Herring,
Matthias Brugger, Mark Brown, Eddie Huang, linux-rtc, devicetree,
Alexandre Belloni, srv_heupstream, Alessandro Zummo, Marc Zyngier,
Sean Wang, linux-kernel, Liam Girdwood, linux-mediatek,
Mark Rutland, linux-arm-kernel
Hi,
On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 13:50 -0700, Sean Wang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 8:49 PM Hsin-Hsiung Wang
> <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Alarm registers high byte was reserved for other functions.
> > This add mask in alarm registers operation functions.
> > This also fix error condition in interrupt handler.
> >
> > Fixes: fc2979118f3f ("rtc: mediatek: Add MT6397 RTC driver")
> >
>
> add a Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org here to apply to all stable kernels
> for the critical fixup patch.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > index e9a25ec..f85f1fc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,14 @@
> >
> > #define RTC_AL_SEC 0x0018
> >
> > +#define RTC_AL_SEC_MASK 0x003f
> > +#define RTC_AL_MIN_MASK 0x003f
> > +#define RTC_AL_HOU_MASK 0x001f
> > +#define RTC_AL_DOM_MASK 0x001f
> > +#define RTC_AL_DOW_MASK 0x0007
> > +#define RTC_AL_MTH_MASK 0x000f
> > +#define RTC_AL_YEA_MASK 0x007f
> > +
> > #define RTC_PDN2 0x002e
> > #define RTC_PDN2_PWRON_ALARM BIT(4)
> >
> > @@ -111,7 +119,7 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_rtc_irq_handler_thread(int irq, void *data)
> > irqen = irqsta & ~RTC_IRQ_EN_AL;
> > mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
> > if (regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_IRQ_EN,
> > - irqen) < 0)
> > + irqen) == 0)
> > mtk_rtc_write_trigger(rtc);
> > mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
> >
> > @@ -233,12 +241,12 @@ static int mtk_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm)
> > alm->pending = !!(pdn2 & RTC_PDN2_PWRON_ALARM);
> > mutex_unlock(&rtc->lock);
> >
> > - tm->tm_sec = data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC];
> > - tm->tm_min = data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN];
> > - tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR];
> > - tm->tm_mday = data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM];
> > - tm->tm_mon = data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH];
> > - tm->tm_year = data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR];
> > + tm->tm_sec = data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] & RTC_AL_SEC_MASK;
> > + tm->tm_min = data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] & RTC_AL_MIN_MASK;
> > + tm->tm_hour = data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] & RTC_AL_HOU_MASK;
> > + tm->tm_mday = data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] & RTC_AL_DOM_MASK;
> > + tm->tm_mon = data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] & RTC_AL_MTH_MASK;
> > + tm->tm_year = data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] & RTC_AL_YEA_MASK;
> >
> > tm->tm_year += RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET;
> > tm->tm_mon--;
> > @@ -259,14 +267,25 @@ static int mtk_rtc_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alm)
> > tm->tm_year -= RTC_MIN_YEAR_OFFSET;
> > tm->tm_mon++;
> >
> > - data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] = tm->tm_sec;
> > - data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] = tm->tm_min;
> > - data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] = tm->tm_hour;
> > - data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] = tm->tm_mday;
> > - data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] = tm->tm_mon;
> > - data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] = tm->tm_year;
> > -
> > mutex_lock(&rtc->lock);
> > + ret = regmap_bulk_read(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_AL_SEC,
> > + data, RTC_OFFSET_COUNT);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto exit;
> > +
>
> Why did we need an additional regmap_bulk_read here? I would suppose
> data[RTC_OFFSET_*] & ~(RTC_AL_*_MASK) is always equal to 0.
In bootloader, RTC init part need to operate these RTC_AL_* registers
high byte for RTC operating mode settings and data storage, while
RTC_AL_* low byte was used as alarm register here. So we need an
additional regmap_bulk_read here to keep the RTC settings correct.
>
> It might be another fixup since change is not being mentioned in the
> git message.
>
> > + data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_SEC] & ~(RTC_AL_SEC_MASK)) |
> > + (tm->tm_sec & RTC_AL_SEC_MASK));
> > + data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_MIN] & ~(RTC_AL_MIN_MASK)) |
> > + (tm->tm_min & RTC_AL_MIN_MASK));
> > + data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_HOUR] & ~(RTC_AL_HOU_MASK)) |
> > + (tm->tm_hour & RTC_AL_HOU_MASK));
> > + data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_DOM] & ~(RTC_AL_DOM_MASK)) |
> > + (tm->tm_mday & RTC_AL_DOM_MASK));
> > + data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_MTH] & ~(RTC_AL_MTH_MASK)) |
> > + (tm->tm_mon & RTC_AL_MTH_MASK));
> > + data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] = ((data[RTC_OFFSET_YEAR] & ~(RTC_AL_YEA_MASK)) |
> > + (tm->tm_year & RTC_AL_YEA_MASK));
> > +
> > if (alm->enabled) {
> > ret = regmap_bulk_write(rtc->regmap,
> > rtc->addr_base + RTC_AL_SEC,
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread