From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl, mchehab+huawei@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] media: cec: check 'transmit_in_progress', not 'transmitting'" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 12:48:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <158124888510314@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.5-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From d51224b73d18d207912f15ad4eb7a4b456682729 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:47:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] media: cec: check 'transmit_in_progress', not 'transmitting'
Currently wait_event_interruptible_timeout is called in cec_thread_func()
when adap->transmitting is set. But if the adapter is unconfigured
while transmitting, then adap->transmitting is set to NULL. But the
hardware is still actually transmitting the message, and that's
indicated by adap->transmit_in_progress and we should wait until that
is finished or times out before transmitting new messages.
As the original commit says: adap->transmitting is the userspace view,
adap->transmit_in_progress reflects the hardware state.
However, if adap->transmitting is NULL and adap->transmit_in_progress
is true, then wait_event_interruptible is called (no timeout), which
can get stuck indefinitely if the CEC driver is flaky and never marks
the transmit-in-progress as 'done'.
So test against transmit_in_progress when deciding whether to use
the timeout variant or not, instead of testing against adap->transmitting.
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Fixes: 32804fcb612b ("media: cec: keep track of outstanding transmits")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # for v4.19 and up
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c b/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
index 1060e633b623..6c95dc471d4c 100644
--- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
+++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
@@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ int cec_thread_func(void *_adap)
bool timeout = false;
u8 attempts;
- if (adap->transmitting) {
+ if (adap->transmit_in_progress) {
int err;
/*
@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ int cec_thread_func(void *_adap)
goto unlock;
}
- if (adap->transmitting && timeout) {
+ if (adap->transmit_in_progress && timeout) {
/*
* If we timeout, then log that. Normally this does
* not happen and it is an indication of a faulty CEC
@@ -509,14 +509,18 @@ int cec_thread_func(void *_adap)
* so much traffic on the bus that the adapter was
* unable to transmit for CEC_XFER_TIMEOUT_MS (2.1s).
*/
- pr_warn("cec-%s: message %*ph timed out\n", adap->name,
- adap->transmitting->msg.len,
- adap->transmitting->msg.msg);
+ if (adap->transmitting) {
+ pr_warn("cec-%s: message %*ph timed out\n", adap->name,
+ adap->transmitting->msg.len,
+ adap->transmitting->msg.msg);
+ /* Just give up on this. */
+ cec_data_cancel(adap->transmitting,
+ CEC_TX_STATUS_TIMEOUT);
+ } else {
+ pr_warn("cec-%s: transmit timed out\n", adap->name);
+ }
adap->transmit_in_progress = false;
adap->tx_timeouts++;
- /* Just give up on this. */
- cec_data_cancel(adap->transmitting,
- CEC_TX_STATUS_TIMEOUT);
goto unlock;
}
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-09 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-09 11:48 gregkh [this message]
2020-02-09 18:19 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] media: cec: check 'transmit_in_progress', not 'transmitting'" failed to apply to 5.5-stable tree Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=158124888510314@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox